agentleFS
LalitMagantiLalitMaganti/syntaqlite/.agents/skills/debug-formatter/SKILL.md

debug-formatter

Skill830 starsChanged 31 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Debug a SQL formatter bug. Use when the user reports incorrect formatting, such as wrong whitespace, misplaced comments, or blank lines.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Add a failing test to syntaqlite/tests/fmt_comments.rs (comment bugs) or the relevant tests/fmt_diff_tests/*.py file.

    line 15
  2. Distinctive:

    Run it and confirm RED:

    line 28
  3. Distinctive:

    All 7 integration suites must pass (including ~650 idempotency checks).

    line 61

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

debug-formatter

Debug a SQL formatter bug using red-green testing and pipeline tracing.

Instructions

1. Reproduce (RED)

Add a failing test to syntaqlite/tests/fmt_comments.rs (comment bugs) or the relevant tests/fmt_diff_tests/*.py file. Always eprintln! the actual output:

#[test]
fn descriptive_name() {
    let input = "...";
    let out = fmt(input);
    eprintln!("=== actual ===\n{out}=== end ===");
    assert_eq!(out, "...\n");
}

Run it and confirm RED:

cargo test -p syntaqlite --features fmt,sqlite --test fmt_comments TEST_NAME -- --nocapture

2. Trace the pipeline

Work through these layers to find the root cause:

LayerFileWhat to check
Grammarsyntaqlite-buildtools/parser-nodes/*.synqfmt { } block; clause("KW", field) expands to IF_SET → LINE → KEYWORD → NEST(LINE, CHILD)
Bytecode compilersyntaqlite-buildtools/src/dialect_codegen/fmt_compiler.rsHow Fmt::Clause, Fmt::Keyword compile to opcodes
Interpretersyntaqlite/src/fmt/interpret.rsMain loop in interpret_node; state = running (committed doc) + pending (deferred line breaks)
Comment drainsyntaqlite/src/fmt/comment.rsdrain_before(offset) respects has_non_comment_text guard; drain_keyword_interior() skips it for multi-word keywords
flush_draininterpret.rsIntegrates DrainResult { trailing, leading } into running/pending; when leading != NIL, pending is dropped
Doc renderersyntaqlite/src/fmt/doc.rsWadler-style; hardline always breaks, line breaks if group broken

3. Common bug patterns

  • Blank line between comments: Two consecutive drains both produce hardline + comment + hardline; back-to-back hardlines = blank line. Fix via continuation flag on drain_keyword_interior.
  • Comment on wrong side of keyword: flush_drain for interior comments runs before keyword text is emitted. Check flush vs keyword append ordering in the Keyword match arm.
  • Comment lost: has_non_comment_text guard stops drain_before when a keyword sits between the comment and target offset. Multi-word interiors need skip_text_check: true.
  • Pending dropped: flush_drain with leading != NIL zeroes pending. If pending held a LINE from the clause template, that break is lost.

4. Fix and verify (GREEN)

cargo test -p syntaqlite --features fmt,sqlite --test fmt_comments TEST_NAME -- --nocapture
cargo test -p syntaqlite --features fmt,sqlite
cargo build -p syntaqlite-cli && tools/run-integration-tests

All 7 integration suites must pass (including ~650 idempotency checks).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.