wiki-maintainer
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Build and maintain a personal LLM Wiki — a local, interlinked markdown knowledge base that the agent compiles and maintains from raw sources. Use when the user wants to set up a knowledge wiki, ingest or compile sources into it, ask questions of it, lint it for health, generate publishable outputs from it, or export a concise context layer for a downstream assistant. Triggers include: "set up my LLM wiki", "compile my wiki", "add this source to my wiki", "ask my wiki", "lint my wiki", "what gaps does my wiki have", "export agent context".
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- microsoft/amplifier-agenttheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- jesspig/Godot-Autopilottheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- SkinnnyJay/wiki-llmtheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- microsoft/amplifier-agent★ 9same name
- jesspig/Godot-Autopilot★ 1same name
- SkinnnyJay/wiki-llm★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
9
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 52
Compound: Every ingest must *deepen* the wiki, not only widen it.
- Distinctive: line 54
The human curates; you maintain: Never invent sources. Cite everything.
- Distinctive: line 58
Every article begins with:
- Very specific: line 93
If enabled for the vault, during every compile scan sources for the user's own maxims, aphorisms, or recurring formulations.
- Very specific: line 102
Read it. Determine source_type from its subfolder.
- Very specific: line 104
Create or update a concept/entity article (with full frontmatter, a ## Summary, topic sections, ## Related, ## Sources).
- Very specific: line 109
Update wiki/index.md, mark the source done in wiki/inbox.md, append an entry to wiki/log.md.
- Very specific: line 115
If article A lists B under ## Related, B must list A.
- Very specific: line 119
Read wiki/index.md first, then the relevant articles (targeted reads, not the whole wiki).
- Very specific: line 124
Run scripts/lint.py and reason over its report: broken links, asymmetric backlinks, orphan pages, missing frontmatter, duplicate content.
- Very specific: line 130
Read wiki/log.md and the domain distribution.
- Very specific: line 152
Never modify anything in raw/.
- Distinctive: line 156
Don't over-build: at small scale the index file is enough — no vector search needed until the wiki is large (hundreds of pages).
- Distinctive: line 171
All scripts are pure Python 3 (standard library only).
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Wiki Maintainer
You maintain a personal LLM Wiki: a local folder of markdown files that you (the agent) compile and keep current from the user's raw source material. This is the Karpathy LLM Wiki pattern, extended with domains, bridge articles, a voice/idiom capture, publishable outputs, and an agent-export layer.
The human curates sources and asks questions. You do all the writing and bookkeeping — summarising, cross-referencing, filing, linting. The user rarely edits the wiki by hand.
Architecture
Four layers live in the wiki repo (paths are relative to the repo root):
raw/ Immutable source material. You READ but NEVER modify it.
Subfolders by type: feeds/ books/ videos/ newsletters/
memories/ journal/ voice/ web/
wiki/ The canonical knowledge base. You OWN this layer entirely:
concept articles, entity articles, bridge articles, plus the
meta files index.md, inbox.md, log.md, voice.md, about.md
outputs/ Audience-facing artifacts you generate on request
(articles, decks, threads, newsletters). NEVER touched by compile.
agent_exports/ A small, distilled context layer for a downstream assistant.The schema and conventions for a given vault live in that vault's CLAUDE.md
and wiki/about.md. Always read them first if present — the user's domains,
naming, and preferences are declared there and override the defaults below.
Core principles
- Explicit & visible. Memory is plain markdown the user can read, edit, and version. No hidden state.
- Local & file-based. Everything is files in a git repo. Markdown only.
- Compile, don't just retrieve. A new source is integrated into existing pages, not just stored for later lookup.
- Compound. Every ingest must deepen the wiki, not only widen it. After creating new pages, revisit related existing pages and update them.
- The human curates; you maintain. Never invent sources. Cite everything.
Article frontmatter (YAML)
Every article begins with:
---
title: Human-readable title
tags: [tag1, tag2]
created: YYYY-MM-DD
source: "Full citation"
source_type: feed | book | video | newsletter | memory | journal | voice | web
content_type: informative | explainer | opinion | framework | bridge | entity | memory
status: processed
domains: [domain-a, domain-b]
voice: false
---source_type is derivable from the raw/ subfolder a file came from.
domains must use the vault's declared domain list (see wiki/about.md).
Domains and bridge articles
Each vault declares a small set of domains (territories of the user's thinking) at setup. Every article declares which domains it belongs to.
A bridge article connects two or more domains. It is the highest-value article type. When a source spans domains:
- set
content_type: bridgeand addbridgetotags - in the
## Summary, name the connection explicitly ("A bridge between {domain-a} and {domain-b}: …")
Bridges are where the user's distinctive thinking lives. Actively look for them.
Voice capture (optional)
If enabled for the vault, during every compile scan sources for the user's own
maxims, aphorisms, or recurring formulations. Append each, verbatim and dated,
to wiki/voice.md. Set voice: true on any article where one surfaces. Never
fabricate these — only capture lines the user actually wrote or said.
Operations
Ingest / compile
For each new file in raw/:
- Read it. Determine
source_typefrom its subfolder. - Discuss key takeaways briefly with the user if interactive.
- Create or update a concept/entity article (with full frontmatter, a
## Summary, topic sections,## Related,## Sources). - Compounding step: revisit 5–10 related existing articles and update them with new cross-references, supporting evidence, or flagged contradictions.
- Capture any voice lines.
- Update
wiki/index.md, mark the source done inwiki/inbox.md, append an entry towiki/log.md.
A single source typically touches 5–15 wiki pages.
Backlinks (always bidirectional)
If article A lists B under ## Related, B must list A. Write both directions at
creation time; do not rely on lint to repair them later.
Query / qa
Read wiki/index.md first, then the relevant articles (targeted reads, not the
whole wiki). Synthesise an answer with exact [[article]] citations. Offer to
file valuable answers back as new wiki pages (source_type: journal).
Lint
Run scripts/lint.py and reason over its report: broken links, asymmetric
backlinks, orphan pages, missing frontmatter, duplicate content. Flag
contradictions and stale claims but do not auto-resolve them — surface them
for the user.
Next
Read wiki/log.md and the domain distribution. Identify gaps and propose what
to source or write next. A gap that persists across three next passes is
structural — it means raw material is missing, not that an article is pending.
Output
Generate audience-facing artifacts into outputs/ (never modify the wiki):
medium, newsletter, thread, deck (Marp), or a domain-specific format the
vault defines. Draw only from wiki content; cite sources.
Agent-export
Distil the current wiki into a handful of concise files under agent_exports/
(a brief, active projects, writing style, reusable frameworks, a pipeline, and
operating context). These are short — they orient a downstream assistant without
making it read the whole wiki. Keep the deep layer rich; keep this layer small.
Index and log conventions
wiki/index.md— catalog of every page: link + one-line summary, grouped by domain/category. Update on every ingest. Read it first on any query.wiki/log.md— append-only, chronological. Prefix each entry consistently, e.g.## [YYYY-MM-DD] compile | <title>, so it is greppable.
Guardrails
- Never modify anything in
raw/. It is the source of truth. - Cite every factual claim to a source in
## Sources. - Keep links bidirectional.
- Flag contradictions; never silently overwrite a prior claim.
- Don't over-build: at small scale the index file is enough — no vector search needed until the wiki is large (hundreds of pages).
Bundled scripts
Invoke with the plugin root path. Examples:
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/wiki-maintainer/scripts/lint.py" --wiki ./wiki
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/wiki-maintainer/scripts/backlinks.py" --wiki ./wiki # report
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/wiki-maintainer/scripts/backlinks.py" --wiki ./wiki --fix # repair
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/wiki-maintainer/scripts/new_article.py" --wiki ./wiki \
--slug forward-deployed-engineer --title "Forward-Deployed Engineer Model" \
--domains ai-strategy,consulting --source "raw/feeds/fde.md" --type bridgeAll scripts are pure Python 3 (standard library only).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

