agentleFS
LNSDLNSD/lorecraft/.agents/skills/code-integrate/SKILL.md

code-integrate

Skill0 starsChanged 15 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Integrate a Code Writer's patch files into a part branch, run the gates and measure the size, then squash the branch into one signed commit and push it. Use when a Writer report arrives with format-patch files, when a part branch needs its commits applied and checked, or when a checked part is ready to squash and push. Not for choosing commit messages (see /commit), for restacking branches, or for syncing open pull requests.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run on a clean working tree.

    line 24
  2. Very specific:

    After apply --rebase, it uses the recorded base and lease SHA and allows the rebased branch not to contain origin/<branch>.

    line 53

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Code Integrate

Two mechanical steps of integrating a Writer's work, as one command each. Every command prints ONE compact JSON result and writes the raw git and gate output to a log file, named in the result as log; read the log only when the result says something failed. Judgement stays with the caller: the commit message, the split, the review.

When to Use

  • apply: a Writer's patch files are ready to go onto a part branch, and the gates and size are wanted.
  • squash: the applied branch is accepted and is to become one signed commit on its base, pushed.

The scripts never resolve a conflict, never commit unsigned, never use plain --force, and never merge or close a pull request.

Commands

Run on a clean working tree. --repo names the repository and defaults to the current directory, so the call needs no cd; patch and message-file paths are read from the caller's directory, not from --repo.

python3 <repo>/.agents/skills/code-integrate/scripts/integrate.py apply --repo <repo> --branch lnsd/<slug> --base origin/main <patch>...
python3 <repo>/.agents/skills/code-integrate/scripts/integrate.py apply --repo <repo> --branch lnsd/<slug> --base origin/main --rebase <patch>...
python3 <repo>/.agents/skills/code-integrate/scripts/integrate.py squash --repo <repo> --branch lnsd/<slug> --base origin/main --message-file <file>
ArgumentMeaning
--repoThe repository to work in; default the current directory
--branchThe part branch, as named on the remote
--baseThe ref the part sits on: origin/main, or the branch of the part below
<patch>...The git format-patch files, in order
--message-fileThe commit message, written by the caller with the commit skill
--rebaseapply only: start the part branch at --base, not origin/<branch>, for patches from a Writer REBASE

apply fetches, switches to the branch (created at the base when it is not on the remote, otherwise at origin/<branch>; a local branch that already descends from that start is continued, so a FIX after a failed gate lands on top of the commits applied before), applies the patches with git am --3way, runs the gates fmt-check, check, typecheck, test and check-docs in that order, stopping at the first failure, and measures the size against the base. With --rebase, it starts at --base even when the local branch still points to the old remote head, and records that fetched remote SHA for squash's lease. The default behavior is unchanged. A FIX after a failed apply --rebase must pass --rebase again to keep the same mode. A gate that passes but leaves the tree changed is reported as gates_failed.

squash soft-resets to the base, commits with -s -S, checks that %G? is G, then pushes: -u when the branch is new on the remote, otherwise --force-with-lease pinned to the origin/<branch> that apply fetched. After apply --rebase, it uses the recorded base and lease SHA and allows the rebased branch not to contain origin/<branch>. A remote update after apply still makes the lease fail. It refuses when the tree is not clean, when the default-mode branch does not contain origin/<branch>, and when the push is rejected; each time it puts the branch back and pushes nothing, as it does when the commit is not signed.

Result

{"status":"ok","branch":"lnsd/x","base_sha":"…","start_sha":"…","head_sha":"…","commits":2,"size":243,"gates":{"fmt-check":"pass","check":"pass"},"log":"…"}
  • apply: status is ok, gates_failed (the failed gate is fail and later gates did not run, or a gate left the tree changed, with a reason) or needs_rebase. In rebase mode, lease_sha is the remote SHA fetched for the later push lease. size is lines added plus deleted against the base, lockfiles and binary files excluded.
  • squash: status is ok with head_sha, signature (G) and push (new or lease).
  • refused and error carry a reason.

Exit codes

CodeMeaningWhat the caller does
0okContinue
1A gate failedRead the log, send the failure back as a FIX
2The patches do not apply; git am was aborted and the branch is untouchedResolve the patch conflict with the Writer against the selected base
3Refused (--repo is not a git repository, dirty tree, local branch not descending from its start, unsigned commit, base not an ancestor, remote ahead of the branch in default mode, or stale rebase lease) or a git command failedRead reason; fix the setup, do not work around it

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.