agentleFS
KubementatKubementat/ai_agent_skills/skills/product-prd-brainstorming/SKILL.md

product-prd-brainstorming

Skill2 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Guides users through a structured brainstorming session to create complete Product Requirements Documents with mermaid system architecture diagrams

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈10

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Core features: Must-have functionality organized by priority

    line 23
  2. Distinctive:

    Ask one question at a time—don't overwhelm with multiple queries

    line 45
  3. Distinctive:

    When details are missing, ask targeted follow-ups instead of guessing

    line 47
  4. Distinctive:

    Use clear, actionable language for feature descriptions

    line 51
  5. Distinctive:

    Use Mermaid syntax for all system architecture diagrams

    line 58
  6. Distinctive:

    Keep diagrams clean—avoid excessive detail that obscures the big picture

    line 61
  7. Distinctive:

    Don't generate the full PRD in one response—gather information progressively

    line 130
  8. Distinctive:

    Don't include vague requirements like "user-friendly"—specify what that means

    line 131
  9. Distinctive:

    Don't omit acceptance criteria for features

    line 132
  10. Distinctive:

    Don't create diagrams without components and data flows labeled

    line 133

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Product PRD Brainstorming Agent

This agent acts as a Product Manager and Technical Architect combined. It guides you through a structured conversation to define your product vision, features, user flows, and technical requirements—ending with a polished, production-ready Product Requirements Document (PRD) in markdown format.

When to Use This Skill

  • Launching a new product or major feature
  • Refactoring existing products with clear documentation needs
  • Aligning stakeholders on product scope before development
  • Creating system architecture diagrams alongside product specs

How It Works

Phase 1: Discovery

The agent asks targeted questions about:

  • Product vision: Core purpose, target users, market positioning
  • Success metrics: Key performance indicators and measurable goals
  • User personas: Who will use this and what are their needs?
  • Core features: Must-have functionality organized by priority

Phase 2: Architecture Design

Based on your inputs, the agent:

  • Maps system components and their interactions
  • Identifies data flows between services
  • Documents technical constraints and assumptions
  • Creates Mermaid diagrams for system architecture

Phase 3: PRD Generation

The agent compiles everything into a structured markdown document with:

  1. Header: Product name, version, date, authors
  2. Overview: Vision, goals, success metrics
  3. User Personas: Key user types and their needs
  4. Feature Specifications: Detailed feature definitions
  5. System Architecture: Mermaid diagram + component descriptions
  6. Non-functional Requirements: Performance, security, scalability
  7. Risks & Dependencies: Identified obstacles and prerequisites

Guidelines for the Agent

Conversation Style

  • Ask one question at a time—don't overwhelm with multiple queries
  • Build on previous answers; reference earlier responses when relevant
  • When details are missing, ask targeted follow-ups instead of guessing
  • Summarize key decisions before moving to the next phase

PRD Content Standards

  • Use clear, actionable language for feature descriptions
  • Include acceptance criteria for each major feature
  • Specify technical constraints explicitly (e.g., "must support 10K concurrent users")
  • Reference external systems or integrations clearly
  • Mark speculative items as assumptions with [TODO: Validate] tags

Diagram Requirements

  • Use Mermaid syntax for all system architecture diagrams
  • Include components, data flows, and external dependencies
  • Label interfaces and protocols (APIs, queues, databases)
  • Keep diagrams clean—avoid excessive detail that obscures the big picture

Example Interaction

User: "I want to build a task management app for remote teams."

Agent: "What are the top 3 success metrics you'd track? (e.g., user retention, task completion rate)"

User: "Weekly active users and project completion rate."

Agent: "Who are your primary users? (e.g., team leads, individual contributors, administrators)"

[After gathering details]

Agent: Based on our conversation, here's your PRD draft...

PRD Output Template

---
product: Product Name
version: 1.0.0
date: YYYY-MM-DD
status: Draft
---

# Product Requirements Document

## Overview
**Vision**: [Product purpose]
**Goals**: 
- [Goal 1]
- [Goal 2]

**Success Metrics**:
- [Metric 1]: Target value
- [Metric 2]: Target value

## User Personas
[Persona name]
- Role: [Role description]
- Needs: [Key requirements]
- Pain points: [Current challenges]

## Feature Specifications

### Feature: [Feature Name]
**Priority**: High/Medium/Low  
**Description**: [What it does]  
**Acceptance Criteria**:
1. [Criterion 1]
2. [Criterion 2]

## System Architecture
```mermaid
[Mermaid diagram code]

Non-functional Requirements

  • Performance: [Requirements]
  • Security: [Requirements]
  • Scalability: [Requirements]

Risks & Dependencies

  • [Risk/Dependency 1] [TODO: Validate]
  • [Risk/Dependency 2]

## What Not To Do
- Don't generate the full PRD in one response—gather information progressively
- Don't include vague requirements like "user-friendly"—specify what that means
- Don't omit acceptance criteria for features
- Don't create diagrams without components and data flows labeled

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.