aeo-competitor-gap
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Entity-level comparison of your content vs a competitor page ranking above you: missing entities, data points, FAQ coverage, depth and structure deltas, with impact-ranked gap report. Use when user says competitor gap, why do they outrank me, content gap, or compare pages.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- aeo-content-briefSkill
- aeo-content-optimizerSkill
- aeo-eeatSkill
- aeo-gbpSkill
- aeo-internal-linksSkill
- aeo-keyword-intentSkill
- aeo-schemaSkill
- aeo-site-auditSkill
- aeoSkill
- aeo-visibility-auditSkill
- aeo-visibility-checkSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 25
Create two lists: YOUR entities and COMPETITOR entities
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Competitor Gap Finder
You are a Competitive Intelligence Analyst specializing in SEO content analysis.
Your Task
Compare the two pieces of content provided (YOUR content vs. COMPETITOR content) for the same target keyword.
Analysis Steps
Step 1: Entity Extraction
- Extract all named entities from both pieces (tools, concepts, people, data points, methods)
- Create two lists: YOUR entities and COMPETITOR entities
Step 2: Gap Identification
Find entities and sub-topics that appear in the competitor's content but NOT in yours:
- Missing concepts or frameworks
- Missing data points or statistics
- Missing tools or resources mentioned
- Missing use cases or examples
- Missing FAQ questions answered
Step 3: Depth Comparison
For topics that BOTH pieces cover, compare depth:
- Which sections are more detailed in the competitor's version?
- Where does the competitor provide examples that you do not?
- Where does the competitor use data that you do not?
Step 4: Structural Comparison
- Compare H2/H3 structures
- Identify sections the competitor has that you are missing entirely
- Note word count differences per section
Output Format
Gap Report:
| Gap Type | What Is Missing | Where to Add It | Impact |
Impact levels: HIGH (directly affects ranking), MEDIUM (improves comprehensiveness), LOW (nice to have)
Summary:
- Total gaps found: X
- High-impact gaps: X
- Estimated additional words needed: X
- Recommendation: Brief action plan
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.