release-tag
Skill5 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Cut a release by determining the SemVer bump from history, updating version files across any stack, refreshing the changelog, creating an annotated (optionally signed) Git tag, and pushing the release safely after pre-flight checks. Use when tagging a version, bumping the version, or preparing a release.
- Commits and pushes
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- poweruserz/OpenTokenUsagetheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- TGPSKI/leathertheir own version, first seen Sep 7, 2026
- KcAnom/pi-fairy-tales-chainstheir own version, first seen Jul 17, 2026
- hhhyyyy99/prot-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 16, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- poweruserz/OpenTokenUsage★ 37same name
- TGPSKI/leather★ 17same name
- hhhyyyy99/prot-skills★ 7same name
- KcAnom/pi-fairy-tales-chains★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository89 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- site/llms-full.txtllms.txt
- site/llms.txtllms.txt
- improveSkill
- academic-writingSkill
- benchmark-reportingSkill
- bibtex-managerSkill
- citation-graphSkill
- citation-verifierSkill
- design-science-methodologySkill
- docx-thesisSkill
- experiment-reproducibilitySkill
- latex-toolkitSkill
- literature-searchSkill
- lit-review-synthesisSkill
- paper-readerSkill
- proofread-academicSkill
- research-figuresSkill
- research-methodologySkill
- research-questionSkill
- statistics-advisorSkill
- supervisor-updateSkill
- systematic-reviewSkill
- thesis-proposalSkill
- coolify-image-appSkill
- coolify-vps-baselineSkill
- deploy-verificationSkill
- express-prisma-coolify-imageSkill
- ghcr-coolify-pipelineSkill
- live-domain-cutoverSkill
- nextjs-coolify-imageSkill
- proxy-client-addressSkill
- vps-ops-toolkitSkill
- adr-writingSkill
- openapi-specSkill
- readme-writingSkill
- technical-writingSkill
- adversarial-reviewerSkill
- api-design-reviewSkill
- code-review-responseSkill
- create-agentSkill
- create-commandSkill
- create-hookSkill
- create-skillSkill
- db-migration-safetySkill
- dependency-upgradeSkill
- dockerfile-best-practicesSkill
- error-handling-patternsSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- explain-codebaseSkill
- fix-ciSkill
- github-actions-pipelineSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- incident-postmortemSkill
- logging-and-observabilitySkill
- parallel-agentsSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- refactoring-recipesSkill
- solid-principlesSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Tags are immutable once published: Never move or overwrite a pushed tag.
- Distinctive: line 37
Update wherever the canonical version lives.
- Distinctive: line 51
Keep lockfiles consistent.
- Very specific: line 70
If CI builds/publishes/creates the release from the tag, say so and let it run.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Take the repo from "ready" to a clean, tagged, pushed release. Releases are outward-facing and effectively irreversible once published, so every step is gated by pre-flight checks and explicit confirmation.
Hard rules: never break these
- Never release a dirty or unverified tree. Working tree clean, on the correct branch, up to date with the remote, and tests/CI green; all true before tagging.
- Tags are immutable once published. Never move or overwrite a pushed tag; if a release is wrong, cut a new patch version. Force-retagging breaks everyone who already pulled.
- Follow SemVer honestly. The bump must reflect what actually changed (see Step 2), not a convenient number.
- Confirm before the commit, the tag, and the push. These are the irreversible, outward-facing actions.
- No AI/co-author trailers in the release commit or tag message.
- Publishing is downstream. Tagging ≠ publishing to a registry. Don't run
npm publish/cargo publish/ etc. unless explicitly asked; most pipelines publish from CI on tag.
Step 1: Pre-flight
git status→ clean tree (or stash/commit deliberate changes first).- On the release branch (usually
main/masteror arelease/*branch) and synced:git fetch && git statusshows up to date. - Latest tag and history since it:
git describe --tags --abbrev=0. - Tests, linters, and build pass locally; CI on the release commit is green.
Step 2: Determine the version
Derive the SemVer bump from the commits since the last tag:
- MAJOR: any breaking change (
!marker,BREAKING CHANGE:footer, removed/incompatible API). - MINOR: new backward-compatible features (
feat). - PATCH: backward-compatible fixes only (
fix,perf). - Pre-1.0: minor/patch carry the instability caveat; respect the project's stated policy.
- Honor pre-release / build identifiers if used (
1.4.0-rc.1,+build.5) and any explicit version the user gives.
Step 3: Bump the version files (stack-aware)
Update wherever the canonical version lives; detect by the manifests present:
| Stack | Where / how |
| Node / npm | package.json (+ workspace pkgs); npm version <v> --no-git-tag-version. |
| Rust | Cargo.toml [package] version (+ Cargo.lock) |
| Python | pyproject.toml, setup.py/setup.cfg, or __version__/_version.py |
| Go | usually tag-driven (no file); else a version const / VERSION |
| Java | pom.xml <version>, or gradle.properties/build.gradle |
| .NET | *.csproj <Version>, Directory.Build.props |
| PHP | composer.json version (often omitted in favor of tags) |
| Ruby | *.gemspec / lib/<gem>/version.rb |
| Generic | a top-level VERSION file |
Keep lockfiles consistent. Monorepos: prefer the configured tool (changesets, Lerna, Nx release, Turborepo) and per-package versioning over hand edits. Use the native bump command when one exists, but suppress its auto-tag/commit so the steps below stay explicit and controlled.
Step 4: Update the changelog
Refresh CHANGELOG.md/release notes for this version (delegate to the changelog skill if available): move [Unreleased] items under the new ## [X.Y.Z] - <date> heading, call out breaking changes and migration steps.
Step 5: Commit, then tag (with confirmation)
- Stage only the version + changelog files (explicit paths, never
git add -A), and confirm. - Release commit:
chore(release): vX.Y.Z(or the repo's convention). - Annotated, optionally signed tag, never lightweight:
git tag -a vX.Y.Z -m "Release vX.Y.Z"(add-sto sign if the project signs releases).- Match the existing tag prefix style (
v1.4.0vs1.4.0; checkgit tag).
- Sanity-check:
git show vX.Y.Zpoints at the release commit and the message is right.
Step 6: Push (with confirmation)
- Confirm branch + tag + remote.
- Push the commit and the tag:
git push origin <branch>thengit push origin vX.Y.Z(or--follow-tags). Avoidgit push --tags(it pushes all tags). - If CI builds/publishes/creates the release from the tag, say so and let it run; don't duplicate the publish manually.
Report the released version, the tag, the commit it points to, and what (if anything) downstream automation will now do.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

