agentleFS
KhaledSaeed18KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude/skills/version-control/git-undo/SKILL.md

git-undo

Skill5 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Recover safely from Git mistakes such as discard, unstage, amend, reset, revert, restore lost commits via reflog, recover deleted branches, and fix bad rebases. Chooses the least-destructive fix and protects against data loss. Use when something in Git went wrong and needs undoing.

  • Deletes or force-pushes

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Take a safety net before any destructive op: Before reset --hard, a force-push, or a history rewrite, snapshot the current tip: git branch …

    line 13
  2. Distinctive:

    Remove untracked files → git clean -nd (dry run first!), then git clean -fd once confirmed.

    line 32

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Undo the mistake with the least-destructive tool that fits, after establishing two facts that change everything: has the work been committed, and has it been pushed/shared. Get those wrong and you either lose work or rewrite history other people depend on.

Hard rules: never break these

  • Diagnose before acting. Establish: committed or not? pushed or not? on a shared branch? Run git status, git log --oneline -10, and git reflog -20 first. The fix depends entirely on the answers.
  • Never rewrite published history casually. For anything already pushed to a shared branch, undo forward with git revert; do not reset/rebase/commit --amend and force-push unless the user explicitly owns the consequences and coordinates with collaborators.
  • Take a safety net before any destructive op. Before reset --hard, a force-push, or a history rewrite, snapshot the current tip: git branch backup/<desc> or git tag backup/<desc>. Reflog usually saves you, but a branch is free insurance.
  • --hard and clean destroy uncommitted work irrecoverably. Reflog only recovers committed states. Spell out exactly what will be lost and confirm before running them.
  • Confirm before any destructive or shared-history command: reset --hard, clean -fd, push --force*, history rewrites. Prefer push --force-with-lease over --force when a rewrite is genuinely required.

Step 1: Diagnose

  • git status: staged vs unstaged vs untracked; any operation in progress.
  • git log --oneline --graph -15: recent commits and branch shape.
  • git reflog -25: the time machine, every position HEAD has held, even "lost" ones. This is how you recover almost anything committed.
  • Determine shared or local: has the affected commit/branch been pushed? git status (ahead/behind), git branch -r --contains <sha>.

Step 2: Pick the fix

Match the situation to the safest tool:

Uncommitted work

  • Discard changes in a file → git restore <file> (was git checkout -- <file>).
  • Unstage but keep changes → git restore --staged <file> (was git reset HEAD <file>).
  • Set aside without losing → git stash push -m "<note>"; bring back with git stash pop.
  • Remove untracked files → git clean -nd (dry run first!), then git clean -fd once confirmed.

The last commit (not yet pushed)

  • Wrong message → git commit --amend.
  • Forgot a file → stage it, then git commit --amend --no-edit.
  • Undo the commit, keep changes staged → git reset --soft HEAD~1.
  • Undo the commit, keep changes unstaged → git reset --mixed HEAD~1 (default).
  • Undo the commit and discard changes → git reset --hard HEAD~1 (destructive; safety net first).

Already pushed / shared branch

  • Undo a commit safely → git revert <sha> (creates an inverse commit; history stays intact). Revert a merge with -m 1.

Wrong-branch / structural mistakes

  • Committed to the wrong branch → create the right branch from here (git branch feature), then git reset --hard origin/<wrong-branch> on the original (safety net first); or git cherry-pick the commits onto the right branch and drop them from the wrong one.
  • Need an old version of one file → git restore --source=<sha> -- <file>.

Recovering things that look lost

  • Hard reset / branch deletion / bad amend → find the old SHA in git reflog, then git branch recovered <sha> or git reset --hard <sha>.
  • Botched rebase/merge → git reset --hard ORIG_HEAD returns to the pre-operation tip.
  • Deleted branch with no reflog entry → git fsck --lost-found lists dangling commits.
  • Dropped a stash → git fsck --no-reflog | grep commit, or recover from git reflog stash.

Step 3: Safety net (before anything destructive)

Snapshot the current tip so the operation is reversible regardless of outcome:

git branch backup/before-undo        # or: git tag backup/before-undo

Note the current HEAD SHA too. This costs nothing and turns "irreversible" into "recoverable."

Step 4: Execute (with confirmation)

  1. State plainly: what command runs, what it changes, and what (if anything) is lost forever.
  2. For destructive or shared-history operations, get an explicit yes. For force-pushes, use --force-with-lease and confirm no one else's work is being overwritten.
  3. Run it.

Step 5: Verify

  • git status and git log --oneline -5 to confirm the tree and history are what you intended.
  • Confirm recovered work is present (file contents, expected commits).
  • Note the safety branch/tag you created; remove it once the user confirms the recovery is good.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.