scad-improvement
Skill26 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Improve AgentSCAD generation quality from user edits, validation failures, repair outcomes, and learned SCAD patterns.
- Sends data out
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- developer-workflowSkill
- scad-chatSkill
- scad-codingSkill
- scad-generationSkill
- scad-intakeSkill
- scad-library-bosl2Skill
- scad-library-mcadSkill
- scad-library-nopscadlibSkill
- scad-library-policySkill
- scad-library-round-anythingSkill
- scad-library-threadsSkill
- scad-planningSkill
- scad-repairSkill
- scad-validation-reviewSkill
- scad-visual-validateSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 21
User Edits: When users modify the generated code (parameters, SCAD source, or notes), those changes are tracked in JobVersion records via …
- Very specific: line 31
Pattern Injection: When generating new code, buildScadPrompt() in src/lib/skill-resolver.ts loads learned patterns for the requested part …
- Distinctive: line 127
Read the file directly:
- Distinctive: line 153
Delete the learned patterns file:
- Distinctive: line 174
Schedule: Run periodically (e.g., every hour or every 6 hours)
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
SCAD Improvement — Self-Learning Loop
This skill documents the self-learning loop that extracts patterns from user edits and feeds them back into the SCAD generation pipeline. The goal is to make each generation iteration better than the last by learning from what users actually fix.
How It Works
The Loop
- Generation: The pipeline generates OpenSCAD code using
skills/scad-generation/SKILL.mdand per-family parameter schemas inskills/scad-generation/families/. - User Edits: When users modify the generated code (parameters, SCAD source, or notes), those changes are tracked in
JobVersionrecords viasrc/lib/version-tracker.ts. Each version records thefieldthat changed, theoldValue,newValue, andchangedBy(either"user"or"ai_apply"). Pattern Extraction: The
analyzeUserEdits()function insrc/lib/improvement-analyzer.tsqueries recent user edits, groups them by part family, and extracts three types of patterns:- Parameter Drift: Which parameters do users consistently change from defaults? (e.g., "users always increase wall_thickness from 1.2 to 2.0")
- SCAD Source Patches: What lines do users commonly add or modify in the generated code?
- Validation Failures: Which validation rules fail most often for each part family?
- Pattern Storage: Extracted patterns are written to
skills/scad-generation/learned-patterns.jsonwith atomic file writes (write to.tmp, then rename). - Pattern Injection: When generating new code,
buildScadPrompt()insrc/lib/skill-resolver.tsloads learned patterns for the requested part family and injects them as optional context in the generation prompt. This makes the LLM aware of what users typically fix.
Architecture
User edits SCAD code
|
v
JobVersion records created (changedBy: "user")
|
v
Cron: POST /api/cron { action: "analyze-edits" }
|
v
analyzeUserEdits() extracts patterns
|
v
writeLearnedPatterns() saves to learned-patterns.json
|
v
Next generation: buildScadPrompt() injects patterns
|
v
LLM generates better code informed by past editsPattern Types
Parameter Drift
Tracks parameters that users consistently change from generated defaults. For example, if users always increase wall_thickness from 1.2 to 2.0, the system learns this and suggests the higher default in future generations.
Detection logic: Groups parameter edits by name, counts how often each parameter is changed, and computes the average new value. Patterns require at least 2 edits to be considered significant.
SCAD Source Patches
Tracks direct modifications to the OpenSCAD source code. Identifies commonly added lines, commonly removed lines, and overall edit frequency per family.
Detection logic: Diffs old and new SCAD source line-by-line, counts added/removed lines across all edits. Patterns require at least 2 occurrences of the same line change.
Validation Failures
Tracks which validation rules fail most often per part family. This reveals systematic issues in the generation pipeline (e.g., "wall thickness validation fails 80% of the time for phone_case").
Detection logic: Aggregates validation results from jobs that had user edits, counts failures per rule. Patterns require at least 2 failures.
File: learned-patterns.json
Located at skills/scad-generation/learned-patterns.json.
Format
{
"lastUpdated": "2026-04-24T00:00:00Z",
"patterns": [
{
"family": "spur_gear",
"type": "parameter_drift",
"insight": "Users consistently increased wall_thickness from ~1.2 to ~2.0 (5 edits)",
"frequency": 5,
"parameter": "wall_thickness",
"suggestedValue": 2.0,
"details": {
"avgOld": 1.2,
"avgNew": 2.0,
"sampleSize": 5
}
}
],
"stats": {
"totalVersionsAnalyzed": 45,
"userEdits": 15,
"familiesAffected": 3
}
}EditPattern Interface
interface EditPattern {
family: string; // Part family (e.g., "spur_gear", "phone_case")
type: "parameter_drift" | "scad_patch" | "validation_failure";
insight: string; // Human-readable description of the pattern
frequency: number; // How many times this pattern was observed
parameter?: string; // Parameter name (for drift) or internal key
suggestedValue?: number; // Suggested default value (for parameter drift)
details: Record<string, unknown>; // Additional context
}Manual Review and Curation
Viewing Learned Patterns
Read the file directly:
cat skills/scad-generation/learned-patterns.json | jq '.patterns[] | select(.family == "spur_gear")'Or query via the API to trigger a fresh analysis:
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/cron \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"action": "analyze-edits"}'Removing Specific Patterns
Edit skills/scad-generation/learned-patterns.json directly. Remove the pattern object from the patterns array and update lastUpdated. The next generation cycle will reflect the change.
Adjusting Pattern Sensitivity
In src/lib/improvement-analyzer.ts, the MIN_FREQUENCY_FOR_PATTERN constant controls how many observations are needed before a pattern is recognized. Default is 2. Increase this to reduce noise, decrease it to catch patterns faster.
Resetting / Clearing Learned Patterns
Full Reset
Delete the learned patterns file:
rm skills/scad-generation/learned-patterns.jsonThe system will regenerate it from scratch on the next analyze-edits cron run.
Per-Family Reset
Edit skills/scad-generation/learned-patterns.json and remove all patterns with the target family value. Update the stats.familiesAffected count accordingly.
Disable Pattern Injection
To temporarily disable learned pattern injection without deleting the file, set the part family to "unknown" for the job, or wrap the getLearnedPatternsForFamily() call in buildScadPrompt() with a feature flag.
Cron Integration
The self-learning loop is wired into the cron endpoint at src/app/api/cron/route.ts:
- Action:
analyze-edits - Schedule: Run periodically (e.g., every hour or every 6 hours)
- Idempotent: Running the same analysis twice with the same data produces the same output
- Merged: New patterns are merged with existing ones — frequencies accumulate
To run manually:
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/cron \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $CRON_SECRET" \
-d '{"action": "analyze-edits"}'Key Design Decisions
- Optional context only: Learned patterns are injected as suggestions, never as hard constraints. The LLM is free to ignore them if the user's request conflicts.
- Idempotent analysis: Running the analyzer twice with the same data produces the same output. Patterns are deduplicated by
family:type:parameterkey. - Atomic file writes:
learned-patterns.jsonis written to a.tmpfile first, then renamed. This prevents partial writes from corrupting the file. - No new dependencies: The analyzer uses only Prisma for database queries and Node.js
fsfor file operations. No external packages required. - Frequency threshold: Patterns require at least
MIN_FREQUENCY_FOR_PATTERN(default 2) observations to be recognized, preventing noise from one-off edits. - Merging on write: New patterns are merged with existing ones. If a pattern already exists (same family + type + parameter), the frequency is combined and the newer insight/suggestedValue takes precedence.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

