agentleFS
Sign inStart free
Kastalien-ResearchKastalien-Research/thoughtbox/.agents/skills/source-command-hdd-research/SKILL.md

source-command-hdd-research

Skill64 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Phase 1 router for HDD research

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill when the user asks to run the migrated source command hdd-research.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Ask for user approval before moving to ADR staging.

    line 37

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

source-command-hdd-research

Use this skill when the user asks to run the migrated source command hdd-research.

Command Template

/hdd:research

Build context and hypotheses for a new ADR initiative.

Usage

/hdd:research "<task-goal>"

Delegation

  • Primary module: ./modules/research-brief.md
  • Handoff schema: ../_contracts/delegation-handoff-schema.md

Inputs

  • task_goal
  • paths_to_inspect (accepted ADRs, rejected ADRs, staging ADRs, relevant specs)
  • acceptance_checks

Steps

  1. Delegate research to the module using path-scoped inputs.
  2. Capture hypotheses, unknowns, and open risks.
  3. Ask for user approval before moving to ADR staging.

Output

  • Research summary with SOFT hypotheses and blockers.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free