deep-researcher
Skill182 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub
Performs comprehensive, multi-layered research on any topic with structured analysis and synthesis of information from multiple sources. Use when the user needs thorough investigation, market research, technical deep-dives, due diligence, or comprehensive analysis on any subject.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- yanzyuyu/min-toktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- yasdelayu/agent-x-cctheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- nimbalyst/skillstheir own version, first seen Feb 16, 2026
- JohnJBoren/claude-skills-ecosystemtheir own version, first seen Dec 26, 2025
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- nimbalyst/skills★ 28same name
- JohnJBoren/claude-skills-ecosystem★ 2same name
- yanzyuyu/min-tok★ 1same name
- yasdelayu/agent-x-cc★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.
- test-skillSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
19 rules. About 0 are common, 19 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈19
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Use this skill when the user:
- Distinctive: line 28
Start by clearly establishing research parameters:
- Distinctive: line 36
Document these parameters before proceeding.
- Distinctive: line 43
Identify key sources: - Look for authoritative sources, recent publications, expert opinions
- Distinctive: line 44
Note initial findings: - Create preliminary list of important concepts, terms, themes
- Distinctive: line 48
Create an initial research map with main themes and subtopics.
- Distinctive: line 54
Targeted searches: - Use specific queries for each subtopic
- Distinctive: line 59
Future outlook: - Look for predictions, projections, emerging patterns
- Distinctive: line 61
Document findings systematically, noting sources and credibility.
- Distinctive: line 65
Ensure accuracy and reliability:
- Distinctive: line 70
Check recency: - Ensure information is current and relevant
- Distinctive: line 78
Identify patterns: - Look for common themes, trends, relationships
- Distinctive: line 82
Evaluate implications: - Consider significance and consequences
- Distinctive: line 87
Create comprehensive, well-organized final report:
- Distinctive: line 129
Multiple sources: - Don't rely on single source for important facts
- Distinctive: line 131
Data over anecdotes: - Prefer statistical evidence to individual stories
- Distinctive: line 135
Use these frameworks as appropriate:
- Distinctive: line 145
Confirmation bias: - Look for information that challenges assumptions
- Distinctive: line 147
Outdated information: - Always check dates and currency
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Deep Researcher
A comprehensive research workflow skill that guides Claude through systematic, multi-layered research on any topic.
When to use this skill
Use this skill when the user:
- Asks for "deep research" or "comprehensive research" on a topic
- Needs thorough investigation or due diligence
- Requests market research or competitive analysis
- Wants technical deep-dives or architecture reviews
- Needs literature reviews or trend analysis
- Asks for detailed reports with multiple perspectives
Research Workflow
Step 1: Define Research Scope and Objectives
Start by clearly establishing research parameters:
- Identify the main research question - What is the primary question to investigate?
- Define scope boundaries - What aspects should be included or excluded?
- Determine depth requirements - How detailed should the research be?
- Clarify expected deliverables - What format and structure for output?
- List key areas of focus - What specific subtopics to explore?
Document these parameters before proceeding.
Step 2: Conduct Initial Exploratory Research
Begin with broad reconnaissance to map the landscape:
- Search for overview information - Find general information, definitions, and context
- Identify key sources - Look for authoritative sources, recent publications, expert opinions
- Note initial findings - Create preliminary list of important concepts, terms, themes
- Discover related topics - Identify adjacent areas that may be relevant
- Assess information gaps - Note what's available vs. what needs deeper investigation
Create an initial research map with main themes and subtopics.
Step 3: Deep Dive into Key Areas
For each identified key area, conduct detailed investigation:
- Targeted searches - Use specific queries for each subtopic
- Multiple perspectives - Seek diverse viewpoints and approaches
- Technical details - Gather specific data, statistics, methodologies
- Historical context - Understand evolution and background
- Current state - Identify latest developments and trends
- Future outlook - Look for predictions, projections, emerging patterns
Document findings systematically, noting sources and credibility.
Step 4: Cross-Reference and Validate Findings
Ensure accuracy and reliability:
- Verify key facts - Cross-check important information across multiple sources
- Identify contradictions - Note where sources disagree and investigate why
- Assess source credibility - Evaluate authority and reliability
- Check recency - Ensure information is current and relevant
- Look for consensus - Identify where experts or multiple sources agree
- Flag uncertainties - Mark areas where information is unclear or disputed
Step 5: Synthesize and Analyze Information
Transform collected data into insights:
- Identify patterns - Look for common themes, trends, relationships
- Draw connections - Link concepts across sources and subtopics
- Generate insights - Develop original observations based on research
- Compare and contrast - Analyze similarities and differences
- Evaluate implications - Consider significance and consequences
- Address the research question - Directly answer original question with evidence
Step 6: Generate Structured Research Report
Create comprehensive, well-organized final report:
## Report Structure
1. **Executive Summary**
- Brief overview of research question
- Key findings (3-5 main points)
- Main conclusions
2. **Introduction**
- Research scope and objectives
- Methodology overview
- Key areas explored
3. **Main Body** (organized by themes)
- Detailed findings for each key area
- Supporting evidence and examples
- Multiple perspectives where relevant
- Data and statistics
4. **Analysis & Synthesis**
- Patterns and connections identified
- Cross-cutting themes
- Insights and interpretations
5. **Conclusions**
- Direct answers to research questions
- Summary of most significant findings
- Limitations of the research
6. **Sources & References**
- List of key sources consulted
- Credibility notes where relevantResearch Strategies
Information Quality Standards
- Prefer primary sources - Go to original sources when possible
- Recent is better - Prioritize current information for fast-moving topics
- Multiple sources - Don't rely on single source for important facts
- Expert opinion - Seek recognized authorities in the field
- Data over anecdotes - Prefer statistical evidence to individual stories
Analysis Techniques
Use these frameworks as appropriate:
- SWOT analysis - Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
- Compare/Contrast - Systematic comparison of approaches
- Timeline analysis - Historical development and trends
- Stakeholder analysis - Different perspectives and interests
- Gap analysis - What's missing or needs further research
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Confirmation bias - Look for information that challenges assumptions
- Information overload - Know when enough research has been done
- Outdated information - Always check dates and currency
- Single-source dependence - Diversify sources
- Analysis paralysis - Balance thoroughness with timely completion
- Losing focus - Stay aligned with original objectives
Progress Tracking
Copy and update this checklist as you work:
Research Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Define scope and objectives
- [ ] Step 2: Initial exploratory research
- [ ] Step 3: Deep dive into key areas
- [ ] Step 4: Cross-reference and validate
- [ ] Step 5: Synthesize and analyze
- [ ] Step 6: Generate structured reportDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

