agentleFS
Karanjot786Karanjot786/agent-skills-cli/skills/deep-researcher/SKILL.md

deep-researcher

Skill182 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub

Performs comprehensive, multi-layered research on any topic with structured analysis and synthesis of information from multiple sources. Use when the user needs thorough investigation, market research, technical deep-dives, due diligence, or comprehensive analysis on any subject.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions4 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 4

    1. nimbalyst/skills★ 28same name
    2. JohnJBoren/claude-skills-ecosystem★ 2same name
    3. yanzyuyu/min-tok★ 1same name
    4. yasdelayu/agent-x-cc★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

19 rules. About 0 are common, 19 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈19

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when the user:

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    Start by clearly establishing research parameters:

    line 28
  3. Distinctive:

    Document these parameters before proceeding.

    line 36
  4. Distinctive:

    Identify key sources: - Look for authoritative sources, recent publications, expert opinions

    line 43
  5. Distinctive:

    Note initial findings: - Create preliminary list of important concepts, terms, themes

    line 44
  6. Distinctive:

    Create an initial research map with main themes and subtopics.

    line 48
  7. Distinctive:

    Targeted searches: - Use specific queries for each subtopic

    line 54
  8. Distinctive:

    Future outlook: - Look for predictions, projections, emerging patterns

    line 59
  9. Distinctive:

    Document findings systematically, noting sources and credibility.

    line 61
  10. Distinctive:

    Ensure accuracy and reliability:

    line 65
  11. Distinctive:

    Check recency: - Ensure information is current and relevant

    line 70
  12. Distinctive:

    Identify patterns: - Look for common themes, trends, relationships

    line 78
  13. Distinctive:

    Evaluate implications: - Consider significance and consequences

    line 82
  14. Distinctive:

    Create comprehensive, well-organized final report:

    line 87
  15. Distinctive:

    Multiple sources: - Don't rely on single source for important facts

    line 129
  16. Distinctive:

    Data over anecdotes: - Prefer statistical evidence to individual stories

    line 131
  17. Distinctive:

    Use these frameworks as appropriate:

    line 135
  18. Distinctive:

    Confirmation bias: - Look for information that challenges assumptions

    line 145
  19. Distinctive:

    Outdated information: - Always check dates and currency

    line 147

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Deep Researcher

A comprehensive research workflow skill that guides Claude through systematic, multi-layered research on any topic.

When to use this skill

Use this skill when the user:

  • Asks for "deep research" or "comprehensive research" on a topic
  • Needs thorough investigation or due diligence
  • Requests market research or competitive analysis
  • Wants technical deep-dives or architecture reviews
  • Needs literature reviews or trend analysis
  • Asks for detailed reports with multiple perspectives

Research Workflow

Step 1: Define Research Scope and Objectives

Start by clearly establishing research parameters:

  1. Identify the main research question - What is the primary question to investigate?
  2. Define scope boundaries - What aspects should be included or excluded?
  3. Determine depth requirements - How detailed should the research be?
  4. Clarify expected deliverables - What format and structure for output?
  5. List key areas of focus - What specific subtopics to explore?

Document these parameters before proceeding.

Step 2: Conduct Initial Exploratory Research

Begin with broad reconnaissance to map the landscape:

  1. Search for overview information - Find general information, definitions, and context
  2. Identify key sources - Look for authoritative sources, recent publications, expert opinions
  3. Note initial findings - Create preliminary list of important concepts, terms, themes
  4. Discover related topics - Identify adjacent areas that may be relevant
  5. Assess information gaps - Note what's available vs. what needs deeper investigation

Create an initial research map with main themes and subtopics.

Step 3: Deep Dive into Key Areas

For each identified key area, conduct detailed investigation:

  1. Targeted searches - Use specific queries for each subtopic
  2. Multiple perspectives - Seek diverse viewpoints and approaches
  3. Technical details - Gather specific data, statistics, methodologies
  4. Historical context - Understand evolution and background
  5. Current state - Identify latest developments and trends
  6. Future outlook - Look for predictions, projections, emerging patterns

Document findings systematically, noting sources and credibility.

Step 4: Cross-Reference and Validate Findings

Ensure accuracy and reliability:

  1. Verify key facts - Cross-check important information across multiple sources
  2. Identify contradictions - Note where sources disagree and investigate why
  3. Assess source credibility - Evaluate authority and reliability
  4. Check recency - Ensure information is current and relevant
  5. Look for consensus - Identify where experts or multiple sources agree
  6. Flag uncertainties - Mark areas where information is unclear or disputed

Step 5: Synthesize and Analyze Information

Transform collected data into insights:

  1. Identify patterns - Look for common themes, trends, relationships
  2. Draw connections - Link concepts across sources and subtopics
  3. Generate insights - Develop original observations based on research
  4. Compare and contrast - Analyze similarities and differences
  5. Evaluate implications - Consider significance and consequences
  6. Address the research question - Directly answer original question with evidence

Step 6: Generate Structured Research Report

Create comprehensive, well-organized final report:

## Report Structure

1. **Executive Summary**
   - Brief overview of research question
   - Key findings (3-5 main points)
   - Main conclusions

2. **Introduction**
   - Research scope and objectives
   - Methodology overview
   - Key areas explored

3. **Main Body** (organized by themes)
   - Detailed findings for each key area
   - Supporting evidence and examples
   - Multiple perspectives where relevant
   - Data and statistics

4. **Analysis & Synthesis**
   - Patterns and connections identified
   - Cross-cutting themes
   - Insights and interpretations

5. **Conclusions**
   - Direct answers to research questions
   - Summary of most significant findings
   - Limitations of the research

6. **Sources & References**
   - List of key sources consulted
   - Credibility notes where relevant

Research Strategies

Information Quality Standards

  • Prefer primary sources - Go to original sources when possible
  • Recent is better - Prioritize current information for fast-moving topics
  • Multiple sources - Don't rely on single source for important facts
  • Expert opinion - Seek recognized authorities in the field
  • Data over anecdotes - Prefer statistical evidence to individual stories

Analysis Techniques

Use these frameworks as appropriate:

  • SWOT analysis - Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
  • Compare/Contrast - Systematic comparison of approaches
  • Timeline analysis - Historical development and trends
  • Stakeholder analysis - Different perspectives and interests
  • Gap analysis - What's missing or needs further research

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Confirmation bias - Look for information that challenges assumptions
  • Information overload - Know when enough research has been done
  • Outdated information - Always check dates and currency
  • Single-source dependence - Diversify sources
  • Analysis paralysis - Balance thoroughness with timely completion
  • Losing focus - Stay aligned with original objectives

Progress Tracking

Copy and update this checklist as you work:

Research Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Define scope and objectives
- [ ] Step 2: Initial exploratory research  
- [ ] Step 3: Deep dive into key areas
- [ ] Step 4: Cross-reference and validate
- [ ] Step 5: Synthesize and analyze
- [ ] Step 6: Generate structured report

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.