agentleFS
KCNyuKCNyu/clawock/site/llms.txt

clawock / site

llms.txt23 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

AI argues. Code settles. Even the losses stay on the page. clawock is an agent-native, harness-agnostic investment decision-workflow engine. An external agent runtime (Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, DeepSeek Harness, or your own) owns the model, conversation, memory and tools; clawock owns the decision contract: certified evidence, a mandatory opposing case, deterministic money and FX reconciliation, and a public scorecard the model can never grade itself. A real Hong Kong + US account has run it continuously: every judgment settled by…

  • Installs packages

The file

We split this llms.txt into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Every number on the README reproduces from clawock audit-resettle — if it doesn't match, the project loses.

    line 55

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 3,592 llms.txt files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
llms.txt
# clawock

> AI argues. Code settles. Even the losses stay on the page.

clawock is an agent-native, harness-agnostic investment decision-workflow
engine. An external agent runtime (Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, DeepSeek
Harness, or your own) owns the model, conversation, memory and tools; clawock
owns the decision contract: certified evidence, a mandatory opposing case,
deterministic money and FX reconciliation, and a public scorecard the model can
never grade itself.

A real Hong Kong + US account has run it continuously: every judgment settled
by Python; the live account return is published on the dashboard — currently
negative, every loss on the page, every number reproducible from
`clawock audit-resettle`.

## Key pages

- [Complete agent reference](https://kcnyu.github.io/clawock/llms-full.txt): overview, FAQ and external-agent invocation protocol in one Markdown file; generated from the maintained documents on every Pages build
- [FAQ in Markdown](https://kcnyu.github.io/clawock/faq.html.md): the same questions and answers as the human FAQ, without navigation or scripts
- [External agent invocation protocol](https://kcnyu.github.io/clawock/docs/architecture/runtime-protocol.md): prepare, validate, publish, evaluate and bounded improvement; clawock does not call or own the model
- [GitHub repository](https://github.com/KCNyu/clawock): source, issues, PRs
- [Live dashboard](https://kcnyu.github.io/clawock/): positions, risk, self-graded scorecard
- [Daily briefs](https://kcnyu.github.io/clawock/briefs.html): published morning reads (Chinese; the bilingual part is the data coverage behind them)
- [Validation ledger](https://kcnyu.github.io/clawock/#reflect): what was tested and what failed (Reflect tab; `assets/data/evidence.json`)
- [FAQ](https://kcnyu.github.io/clawock/faq.html): questions new users ask
- [简体中文 README](https://github.com/KCNyu/clawock/blob/master/README.zh.md)

## Install

```bash
python -m pip install clawock
clawock workflow install investment-decision --workspace ./my-decision
clawock init ./my-decision --workflow investment-decision
clawock run prepare --workspace ./my-decision
```

Or throw the repository URL at any agent and let it follow the three-step
skill flow (prepare → write `decision.json` → publish). A no-model end-to-end
proof runs with `bash examples/cli/minimal-run/run.sh`.

## For DeepSeek Harness users

An official-style skill package is available: `dsh plugin --profile web add clawock-dsh`
(published to npm as `clawock-dsh`). The same decision contract works from a
pure CLI, an OpenClaw skill, a Claude Code instruction, a Codex AGENTS.md, or a
DSH agent — see [examples](https://github.com/KCNyu/clawock/tree/master/examples).

## What makes it different

- The model can never grade itself: LLMs propose, Python settles.
- One thesis counts once; repeated restatements collapse into one episode.
- Factors need out-of-sample validation before they influence decisions.
- The ledger must reconcile before anything is published.
- Every number on the README reproduces from `clawock audit-resettle` — if it
  doesn't match, the project loses.

## Honesty policy

The live scorecard keeps every eligible result, losses included, including the
fact that active recommendations have not beaten buy-and-hold. This repository
is a personal record and portable workspace — not investment advice, not a
copy-trading service.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.