agentleFS
K-Dense-AIK-Dense-AI/drug-discovery-agent-skills/skills/diffdock/SKILL.md

diffdock

Skill54 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

DiffDock and DiffDock-L diffusion-based molecular docking. Use for blind protein-small-molecule pose prediction from a PDB file or sequence plus SMILES/SDF/MOL2, batch docking over a CSV of complexes, virtual screening triage, sampling multiple poses per complex, and reading the confidence score correctly. Also trigger on DiffDock, DiffDock-L, inference.py, confidence_model, samples_per_complex, ESM embedding preparation for docking, or blind docking without a defined box. Not for binding affinity prediction — the confidence score ranks pose plausibility, not potency.

16 other projects use a version of this, 10 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use chai1, evo2 and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • naitySkill

    chai1

    Skill for biomolecular structure prediction with Chai-1 from Chai Discovery. Use this skill when a user wants to predict protein structures, protein-ligand complexes, protein-nucleic acid complexes, or multi-chain biomolecular assemblies. Also trigger when the user mentions Chai-1, chai-lab, or wants an AlphaFold3/Boltz-2 alternative that supports proteins, small molecules, RNA, and DNA. Chai-1 is Apache 2.0 licensed (commercial use allowed).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • naitySkill

    evo2

    Skill for genomic sequence modeling and design with Evo2 from Arc Institute. Use this skill when a user wants to model or generate DNA sequences, score variant effects at single-nucleotide resolution, extract genomic embeddings, analyze mutations in non-coding or coding regions, design synthetic genomic elements, compute positional entropy across a sequence, or work with genome-scale context (up to 1M base pairs). Also trigger when the user mentions Evo2, Evo 2, Arc Institute DNA model, genomic language models, DNA variant scoring, or genome-scale foundation models. NOTE: Evo2 is a DNA model — it is NOT a protein language model. For protein embeddings or protein variant scoring use ESM2, ESM-C, or ProtT5 instead.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • JimLiuSkill

    esmfold2

    Biohub ESMFold2 / ESMFold2-Fast all-atom co-folding (Candido et al. 2026, github.com/Biohub/esm). Single-sequence and MSA modes; protein, DNA, RNA, ligand (CCD/SMILES), modified residues. FoldBench Ab-Ag 50-55%, PPI 70-77% DockQ-pass. Also covers the ESMC-{300M,600M,6B} protein language models from the same release: masked-LM logits, hidden states, mutation scoring, contact prediction, and the SAE interpretability head. MIT-licensed weights on HuggingFace org `biohub`. Use this skill when: (1) Predicting complex structures with single-sequence input, (2) Validating designed binders with ESMFold2-Fast, (3) Running ESMFold2 with MSA input, (4) Getting ESMC embeddings or per-residue mutation scores, (5) Choosing kernel backend and sampling-step settings for paper-faithful throughput.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • JimLiuSkill

    fair-esm2

    Embed proteins with Meta AI's ESM-2 (`fair-esm` package). Use this skill when: (1) Extracting per-residue or per-sequence embeddings for downstream ML, (2) Masked-LM likelihood / mutation effect scoring, (3) Contact prediction from a sequence.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +2 more from naity
  • +5 more from JimLiu

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

25 rules. 19 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • 19

    Common

    Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Before proceeding with DiffDock tasks, verify the environment setup:

    line 43
  2. Common:

    Use the provided script to create or validate batch input:

    line 122
  3. Common:

    After docking completes, analyze confidence scores and rank predictions:

    line 175
  4. Very specific:

    For detailed guidance: Read references/confidence_and_limitations.md using the Read tool

    line 219
  5. Common:

    Create custom configuration for specific use cases:

    line 225
  6. Very specific:

    For complete parameter reference: Read references/parameters_reference.md using the Read tool

    line 260
  7. Common:

    Run docking with increased sampling:

    line 285
  8. Very specific:

    Use AmberTools MMPBSA.py or gmx_MMPBSA after energy minimization

    line 306
  9. Common:

    Use OpenMM + OpenFE or GROMACS for FEP/TI calculations

    line 309
  10. Very specific:

    For complete limitations: Read references/confidence_and_limitations.md using the Read tool

    line 332
  11. Common:

    Use GPU (essential for practical use)

    line 361
  12. Common:

    Start with default parameters, then tune if needed

    line 364
  13. Common:

    Use canonical SMILES for ligands

    line 366
  14. Very specific:

    prepare_batch_csv.py: Create and validate batch input CSV files

    line 384
  15. Common:

    Create templates with example entries

    line 385
  16. Common:

    Check for required columns and format issues

    line 387
  17. Very specific:

    setup_check.py: Verify DiffDock environment setup

    line 395
  18. Common:

    Check Python version and dependencies

    line 396
  19. Common:

    Verify PyTorch and CUDA availability

    line 397
  20. Common:

    Test RDKit and PyTorch Geometric installation

    line 398
  21. Common:

    All command-line options and configuration parameters

    line 404
  22. Common:

    Default values and acceptable ranges

    line 405
  23. Common:

    Read this file when users need:

    line 409
  24. Common:

    When to trust predictions

    line 416
  25. Common:

    When using DiffDock, cite the appropriate papers:

    line 478

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

DiffDock: Molecular Docking with Diffusion Models

Overview

DiffDock is a diffusion-based deep learning tool for molecular docking that predicts 3D binding poses of small molecule ligands to protein targets. It represents the state-of-the-art in computational docking, crucial for structure-based drug discovery and chemical biology.

Core Capabilities:

  • Predict ligand binding poses with high accuracy using deep learning
  • Support protein structures (PDB files) or sequences (via ESMFold)
  • Process single complexes or batch virtual screening campaigns
  • Generate confidence scores to assess prediction reliability
  • Handle diverse ligand inputs (SMILES, SDF, MOL2)

Key Distinction: DiffDock predicts binding poses (3D structure) and confidence (prediction certainty), NOT binding affinity (ΔG, Kd). Always combine with scoring functions (GNINA, MM/GBSA) for affinity assessment.

When to Use This Skill

This skill should be used when:

  • "Dock this ligand to a protein" or "predict binding pose"
  • "Run molecular docking" or "perform protein-ligand docking"
  • "Virtual screening" or "screen compound library"
  • "Where does this molecule bind?" or "predict binding site"
  • Structure-based drug design or lead optimization tasks
  • Tasks involving PDB files + SMILES strings or ligand structures
  • Batch docking of multiple protein-ligand pairs

Installation and Environment Setup

Check Environment Status

Before proceeding with DiffDock tasks, verify the environment setup:

# Use the provided setup checker
python scripts/setup_check.py

This script validates Python version, PyTorch with CUDA, PyTorch Geometric, RDKit, ESM, and other dependencies.

Installation Options

Option 1: Conda (Recommended)

git clone https://github.com/gcorso/DiffDock.git
cd DiffDock
conda env create --file environment.yml
conda activate diffdock

Option 2: Docker

docker pull rbgcsail/diffdock
docker run -it --gpus all --entrypoint /bin/bash rbgcsail/diffdock
micromamba activate diffdock

Important Notes:

  • GPU strongly recommended (10-100x speedup vs CPU)
  • First run pre-computes SO(2)/SO(3) lookup tables (~2-5 minutes)
  • Model checkpoints (~500MB) download automatically if not present
  • Current upstream release is DiffDock v1.1.3; DiffDock-L is the default model line in default_inference_args.yaml

Core Workflows

Workflow 1: Single Protein-Ligand Docking

Use Case: Dock one ligand to one protein target

Input Requirements:

  • Protein: PDB file OR amino acid sequence
  • Ligand: SMILES string OR structure file (SDF/MOL2)

Command:

python -m inference \
  --config default_inference_args.yaml \
  --protein_path protein.pdb \
  --ligand_description "CC(=O)Oc1ccccc1C(=O)O" \
  --out_dir results/single_docking/

Alternative (protein sequence):

python -m inference \
  --config default_inference_args.yaml \
  --protein_sequence "MSKGEELFTGVVPILVELDGDVNGHKF..." \
  --ligand_description ligand.sdf \
  --out_dir results/sequence_docking/

Output Structure:

results/single_docking/
└── complex_0/
    ├── rank1.sdf                    # Convenience copy of top-ranked pose
    ├── rank1_confidence0.87.sdf     # Top-ranked pose with confidence in filename
    ├── rank2_confidence0.42.sdf     # Second-ranked pose
    ├── ...
    └── rank10_confidence-1.23.sdf   # 10th pose (default: 10 samples)

Current inference.py registers --ligand_description for single-complex runs. Some upstream README text still says --ligand; use --ligand_description unless your local checkout explicitly supports a --ligand alias.

Workflow 2: Batch Processing Multiple Complexes

Use Case: Dock multiple ligands to proteins, virtual screening campaigns

Step 1: Prepare Batch CSV

Use the provided script to create or validate batch input:

# Create template
python scripts/prepare_batch_csv.py --create --output batch_input.csv

# Validate existing CSV
python scripts/prepare_batch_csv.py my_input.csv --validate

CSV Format:

complex_name,protein_path,ligand_description,protein_sequence
complex1,protein1.pdb,CC(=O)Oc1ccccc1C(=O)O,
complex2,,COc1ccc(C#N)cc1,MSKGEELFT...
complex3,protein3.pdb,ligand3.sdf,

Required Columns:

  • complex_name: Unique identifier
  • protein_path: PDB file path (leave empty if using sequence)
  • ligand_description: SMILES string or ligand file path
  • protein_sequence: Amino acid sequence (leave empty if using PDB)

Step 2: Run Batch Docking

python -m inference \
  --config default_inference_args.yaml \
  --protein_ligand_csv batch_input.csv \
  --out_dir results/batch/ \
  --batch_size 10

For Large Virtual Screening (>100 compounds):

Pre-compute protein embeddings for faster processing:

# Pre-compute embeddings
python datasets/esm_embedding_preparation.py \
  --protein_ligand_csv screening_input.csv \
  --out_file protein_embeddings.pt

# Run with pre-computed embeddings
python -m inference \
  --config default_inference_args.yaml \
  --protein_ligand_csv screening_input.csv \
  --esm_embeddings_path protein_embeddings.pt \
  --out_dir results/screening/

Workflow 3: Analyzing Results

After docking completes, analyze confidence scores and rank predictions:

# Analyze all results
python scripts/analyze_results.py results/batch/

# Show top 5 per complex
python scripts/analyze_results.py results/batch/ --top 5

# Filter by confidence threshold
python scripts/analyze_results.py results/batch/ --threshold 0.0

# Export to CSV
python scripts/analyze_results.py results/batch/ --export summary.csv

# Show top 20 predictions across all complexes
python scripts/analyze_results.py results/batch/ --best 20

The analysis script:

  • Parses confidence scores from all predictions
  • Classifies as High (>0), Moderate (-1.5 to 0), or Low (<-1.5)
  • Ranks predictions within and across complexes
  • Generates statistical summaries
  • Exports results to CSV for downstream analysis

Confidence Score Interpretation

Understanding Scores:

Score RangeConfidence LevelInterpretation
> 0HighStrong prediction, likely accurate
-1.5 to 0ModerateReasonable prediction, validate carefully
< -1.5LowUncertain prediction, requires validation

Critical Notes:

  1. Confidence ≠ Affinity: High confidence means model certainty about structure, NOT strong binding
  2. Context Matters: Adjust expectations for:
    • Large ligands (>500 Da): Lower confidence expected
    • Multiple protein chains: May decrease confidence
    • Novel protein families: May underperform
  3. Multiple Samples: Review top 3-5 predictions, look for consensus

For detailed guidance: Read references/confidence_and_limitations.md using the Read tool

Parameter Customization

Using Custom Configuration

Create custom configuration for specific use cases:

# Copy template
cp assets/custom_inference_config.yaml my_config.yaml

# Edit parameters (see template for presets)
# Then run with custom config
python -m inference \
  --config my_config.yaml \
  --protein_ligand_csv input.csv \
  --out_dir results/

Key Parameters to Adjust

Sampling Density:

  • samples_per_complex: 10 → Increase to 20-40 for difficult cases
  • More samples = better coverage but longer runtime

Inference Steps:

  • inference_steps: 20 → Increase to 25-30 for higher accuracy
  • More steps = potentially better quality but slower

Temperature Parameters (control diversity):

  • temp_sampling_tor: 7.04 → Increase for flexible ligands (8-10)
  • temp_sampling_tor: 7.04 → Decrease for rigid ligands (5-6)
  • Higher temperature = more diverse poses

Presets Available in Template:

  1. High Accuracy: More samples + steps, lower temperature
  2. Fast Screening: Fewer samples, faster
  3. Flexible Ligands: Increased torsion temperature
  4. Rigid Ligands: Decreased torsion temperature

For complete parameter reference: Read references/parameters_reference.md using the Read tool

Advanced Techniques

Ensemble Docking (Protein Flexibility)

For proteins with known flexibility, dock to multiple conformations:

# Create ensemble CSV
import pandas as pd

conformations = ["conf1.pdb", "conf2.pdb", "conf3.pdb"]
ligand = "CC(=O)Oc1ccccc1C(=O)O"

data = {
    "complex_name": [f"ensemble_{i}" for i in range(len(conformations))],
    "protein_path": conformations,
    "ligand_description": [ligand] * len(conformations),
    "protein_sequence": [""] * len(conformations)
}

pd.DataFrame(data).to_csv("ensemble_input.csv", index=False)

Run docking with increased sampling:

python -m inference \
  --config default_inference_args.yaml \
  --protein_ligand_csv ensemble_input.csv \
  --samples_per_complex 20 \
  --out_dir results/ensemble/

Integration with Scoring Functions

DiffDock generates poses; combine with other tools for affinity:

GNINA (Fast neural network scoring):

for pose in results/single_docking/complex_0/*confidence*.sdf; do
    gnina -r protein.pdb -l "$pose" --score_only
done

MM/GBSA (More accurate, slower): Use AmberTools MMPBSA.py or gmx_MMPBSA after energy minimization

Free Energy Calculations (Most accurate): Use OpenMM + OpenFE or GROMACS for FEP/TI calculations

Recommended Workflow:

  1. DiffDock → Generate poses with confidence scores
  2. Visual inspection → Check structural plausibility
  3. GNINA or MM/GBSA → Rescore and rank by affinity
  4. Experimental validation → Biochemical assays

Limitations and Scope

DiffDock IS Designed For:

  • Small molecule ligands (typically 100-1000 Da)
  • Drug-like organic compounds
  • Small peptides (<20 residues)
  • Single or multi-chain proteins

DiffDock IS NOT Designed For:

  • Large biomolecules (protein-protein docking) → Use DiffDock-PP or AlphaFold-Multimer
  • Large peptides (>20 residues) → Use alternative methods
  • Covalent docking → Use specialized covalent docking tools
  • Binding affinity prediction → Combine with scoring functions
  • Membrane proteins → Not specifically trained, use with caution

For complete limitations: Read references/confidence_and_limitations.md using the Read tool

Troubleshooting

Common Issues

Issue: Low confidence scores across all predictions

  • Cause: Large/unusual ligands, unclear binding site, protein flexibility
  • Solution: Increase samples_per_complex (20-40), try ensemble docking, validate protein structure

Issue: Out of memory errors

  • Cause: GPU memory insufficient for batch size
  • Solution: Reduce --batch_size 2 or process fewer complexes at once

Issue: Slow performance

  • Cause: Running on CPU instead of GPU
  • Solution: Verify CUDA with python -c "import torch; print(torch.cuda.is_available())", use GPU

Issue: Unrealistic binding poses

  • Cause: Poor protein preparation, ligand too large, wrong binding site
  • Solution: Check protein for missing residues, remove far waters, consider specifying binding site

Issue: "Module not found" errors

  • Cause: Missing dependencies or wrong environment
  • Solution: Run python scripts/setup_check.py to diagnose

Performance Optimization

For Best Results:

  1. Use GPU (essential for practical use)
  2. Pre-compute ESM embeddings for repeated protein use
  3. Batch process multiple complexes together
  4. Start with default parameters, then tune if needed
  5. Validate protein structures (resolve missing residues)
  6. Use canonical SMILES for ligands

Graphical User Interface

For interactive use, launch the web interface:

python app/main.py
# Navigate to http://localhost:7860

Or use the online demo without installation:

Resources

Helper Scripts (scripts/)

prepare_batch_csv.py: Create and validate batch input CSV files

  • Create templates with example entries
  • Validate file paths and SMILES strings
  • Check for required columns and format issues

analyze_results.py: Analyze confidence scores and rank predictions

  • Parse results from single or batch runs
  • Generate statistical summaries
  • Export to CSV for downstream analysis
  • Identify top predictions across complexes

setup_check.py: Verify DiffDock environment setup

  • Check Python version and dependencies
  • Verify PyTorch and CUDA availability
  • Test RDKit and PyTorch Geometric installation
  • Provide installation instructions if needed

Reference Documentation (references/)

parameters_reference.md: Complete parameter documentation

  • All command-line options and configuration parameters
  • Default values and acceptable ranges
  • Temperature parameters for controlling diversity
  • Model checkpoint locations and version flags

Read this file when users need:

  • Detailed parameter explanations
  • Fine-tuning guidance for specific systems
  • Alternative sampling strategies

confidence_and_limitations.md: Confidence score interpretation and tool limitations

  • Detailed confidence score interpretation
  • When to trust predictions
  • Scope and limitations of DiffDock
  • Integration with complementary tools
  • Troubleshooting prediction quality

Read this file when users need:

  • Help interpreting confidence scores
  • Understanding when NOT to use DiffDock
  • Guidance on combining with other tools
  • Validation strategies

workflows_examples.md: Comprehensive workflow examples

  • Detailed installation instructions
  • Step-by-step examples for all workflows
  • Advanced integration patterns
  • Troubleshooting common issues
  • Best practices and optimization tips

Read this file when users need:

  • Complete workflow examples with code
  • Integration with GNINA, OpenMM, or other tools
  • Virtual screening workflows
  • Ensemble docking procedures

Assets (assets/)

batch_template.csv: Template for batch processing

  • Pre-formatted CSV with required columns
  • Example entries showing different input types
  • Ready to customize with actual data

custom_inference_config.yaml: Configuration template

  • Annotated YAML with all parameters
  • Four preset configurations for common use cases
  • Detailed comments explaining each parameter
  • Ready to customize and use

Best Practices

  1. Verify the environment with setup_check.py, and validate batch CSVs with prepare_batch_csv.py, before starting a large job.
  2. Generate 10-40 samples per complex; start from defaults and tune per system.
  3. Use confidence for initial ranking, not final decisions, and inspect top poses visually.
  4. Combine with a scoring function for affinity, which DiffDock does not provide.
  5. Pre-compute embeddings for screening campaigns, document parameters, and validate experimentally.

Composing with the rest of the bundle

  • uniprot-rcsb → before: find and check the receptor structure before posing anything into it.
  • binding-site-analysis → before: DiffDock needs no box, which makes it easy to dock into a site that was never druggable. Check the pocket first.
  • medchem / rdkit / datamol → before: triage and standardise the library.
  • autodock-vina → alongside: an orthogonal score, and one that returns an affinity estimate where DiffDock returns only pose confidence.
  • boltz → alternative: cofolding when no experimental receptor structure exists.
  • free-energy-perturbation → after: rigorous ΔΔG on the few compounds that justify it.
  • molecular-dynamics → after: does the predicted pose survive a simulation?
  • tamarind → instead: hosted DiffDock when there is no local GPU.

Citations

When using DiffDock, cite the appropriate papers:

DiffDock-L (current default model):

Corso et al. (2024) "Deep Confident Steps to New Pockets: Strategies for Docking Generalization"
ICLR 2024, arXiv:2402.18396

Original DiffDock:

Corso et al. (2023) "DiffDock: Diffusion Steps, Twists, and Turns for Molecular Docking"
ICLR 2023, arXiv:2210.01776

Additional Resources

Repository · demo · DiffDock-L paper · original paper

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.