agentleFS
JustYanniccJustYannicc/skills/skills/framing-decisions/SKILL.md

framing-decisions

Skill3 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when making a consequential choice.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Test this with matched truthful decision frames.

    line 21
  2. Distinctive:

    If a new presentation changes what is available or makes one choice easier, it changes the decision itself.

    line 23
  3. Distinctive:

    Stop when another truthful frame would not change the choice or when only the decision-maker's values can resolve the remaining sensitivity.

    line 31

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Framing decisions

Separate a decision from how it is presented. Equivalent descriptions should not silently produce different judgments.

Hold the decision constant

Identify the choice beneath its presentation.

Ask:

Would the judgment change if the same facts were presented differently?

Test this with matched truthful decision frames. Keep the underlying choice fixed and change only how it is expressed.

If a new presentation changes what is available or makes one choice easier, it changes the decision itself. Analyze that change rather than calling it a framing effect.

Find what survives the frame

Agreement across matched frames strengthens the judgment that remains stable. A reversal reveals frame sensitivity, not a stable preference.

Base the choice on what survives the tested frames. When the answer depends on values, make that dependence visible and let the decision-maker resolve it.

Stop when another truthful frame would not change the choice or when only the decision-maker's values can resolve the remaining sensitivity.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.