doc-standards
Skill16 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Documentation writing-quality standards — controlled language (ASD-STE100), Google/Microsoft style guide rules, ISO 24495 plain language, AI/agent readability (llms.txt, self-contained sections), and a machine-checkable lint gate. Use whenever writing or reviewing ANY documentation prose — README, API reference, tutorial, how-to, changelog, error message, code comment blocks, llms.txt — even if the user only says "write docs", "document this", "improve the README", "docs smell like AI", or "make the docs clearer". Structure/coverage questions (which doc types exist) belong to a Diátaxis-structure skill if one is installed; THIS skill governs how each sentence and section is written, and provides the lint gate to verify it.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- pillumina/ascend-sleuththeir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- pillumina/ascend-sleuth★ 5same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 46
Read references/ste100.md before drafting anything longer than a paragraph.
- Distinctive: line 55
Simple tenses only: No present perfect ("has been deprecated" → "was deprecated in v2.1").
- Very specific: line 61
Read references/style-guides.md when writing developer-facing docs.
- Very specific: line 68
Read references/ai-readability.md when the docs will be consumed by agents, RAG pipelines, or coding assistants — which in practice is all …
- Very specific: line 77
If an AI-tell removal skill is installed (for example stop-slop), run its checklist on the final prose — it owns that layer.
- Distinctive: line 83
Run the machine gate:
- Very specific: line 100
Before the first doc ships, write a terminology table into the project's docs (docs/terminology.md or a section in the README): each …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
doc-standards — write documentation that survives translation, retrieval, and skepticism
Documentation written by an LLM has a smell: elegant-variation synonyms, subordinate clauses, filler, hedging. The fix is not "write better" — it is adopting the constraints professional documentation systems already use. This skill stacks five criteria layers, from structure down to the word, and ends in a machine gate.
The five layers
| Layer | Question it answers | Source standard |
| 1. Structure | Which document am I writing, for whom? | Diátaxis + ISO 24495 |
| 2. Controlled language | Is each sentence unambiguous? | ASD-STE100 |
| 3. House style | Is it consistent with developer-docs convention? | Google / Microsoft style guides |
| 4. AI readability | Can an agent retrieve and use each section alone? | llms.txt + retrieval practice |
| 5. Verification | Can a machine confirm 2–4? | Vale / bundled checker |
Workflow
1. Structure first (delegate, don't duplicate)
Classify the document before writing a word: tutorial, how-to, reference, or explanation (Diátaxis). Each has a different contract with the reader — a tutorial promises safe success, a reference promises completeness, a how-to promises a working result, an explanation promises understanding. Mixing them is the #1 structural defect.
- Generating new docs or auditing coverage → if a Diátaxis-structure skill is installed
(for example gstack's
document-generate/document-release), invoke it — it owns the Diátaxis map. Otherwise classify and scaffold the document type yourself before writing. This skill governs the prose inside whatever gets scaffolded. - Then apply ISO 24495's reader-first gate: state who the reader is and what they must be able to DO after reading. If you cannot name the reader, stop and find out. The four plain-language principles — relevant, findable, understandable, usable — are the acceptance criteria for the whole document, not decoration.
2. Draft under controlled language (ASD-STE100)
Read references/ste100.md before drafting anything longer than a paragraph. The core
discipline, always in force even without reading the reference:
- One word, one meaning. Pick one term per concept and repeat it everywhere. Synonym variation ("verify / check / confirm / ensure") is the strongest LLM tell and the #1 source of reader doubt ("is a 'token' the same as the 'key' above?").
- Procedural sentences ≤ 20 words, descriptive ≤ 25. One instruction per sentence.
- Active voice, imperative for instructions. "Run the command", never "the command should be run".
- Simple tenses only. No present perfect ("has been deprecated" → "was deprecated in v2.1").
- Warnings before the step they protect, in command form.
3. House style pass (Google/Microsoft)
Read references/style-guides.md when writing developer-facing docs. Highest-value rules:
second person, present tense, sentence-case headings, goal-before-action steps
("To enable X, run:"), descriptive link text, no "simply/just/easy/please", global-audience
English (no idioms, no "e.g./i.e."), consistent bold-UI/code-font conventions.
4. AI-readability pass
Read references/ai-readability.md when the docs will be consumed by agents, RAG
pipelines, or coding assistants — which in practice is all public docs now (GitBook
measures ~41% of doc traffic from agents). Core rule: every heading-delimited section
must make sense retrieved alone — no "as mentioned above", no split concepts, full
parameter tables, realistic examples with expected output, and an llms.txt index at
the docs root.
5. De-slop and gate
- If an AI-tell removal skill is installed (for example
stop-slop), run its checklist on the final prose — it owns that layer; don't re-derive its rules here. Without one, sweep for the classic tells: filler openers, "not X but Y" contrasts, adverb padding, pull-quote sentences, em-dash overuse. One precedence rule: where literary rhythm advice ("vary sentence length") conflicts with STE100 uniformity in procedural steps, STE100 wins inside numbered procedures; rhythm wins in explanations. - Run the machine gate:
python3 <this-skill's-base-directory>/scripts/check_docs.py <file-or-dir> [--max-words 25]It checks sentence length, passive voice density, banned words, synonym-set collisions,
heading hierarchy, section self-containment markers, and relative-link integrity —
zero dependencies. If vale is installed and a .vale.ini exists, it defers the style
layer to Vale (stronger). To set Vale up for a project, read references/vale-setup.md.
The gate is advisory line-by-line but binding in aggregate: fix every error-level finding; use judgment on warnings (quoted text, proper nouns, and code samples are legitimate exceptions). Do not declare documentation done while the gate reports errors.
Terminology table (do this once per project)
Before the first doc ships, write a terminology table into the project's docs
(docs/terminology.md or a section in the README): each concept, its ONE approved term,
and the banned synonyms. Every later doc, PR description, and error message uses the
approved column. This is the cheapest single intervention — it converts "one word, one
meaning" from a per-sentence effort into a lookup.
Example:
| Concept | Approved | Banned |
| API credential | API key | token, secret, credential |
| Stop a running job | cancel | stop, kill, abort, terminate |
When NOT to apply full strictness
- Marketing copy, blog posts, pitch decks — voice matters more than control; use stop-slop alone.
- Code comments — follow the surrounding codebase's comment density and idiom instead.
- Legal text — do not simplify contract language; plain-language rewrites of legal clauses change meaning.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

