agentleFS
JoaoEquerJoaoEquer/Oficina/skills/clickup-task-breakdown/SKILL.md

clickup-task-breakdown

Skill2 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub

Turn scope documents (data model/UML, functional proposal, execution plan) into structured ClickUp tasks — modules as parent tasks, subtasks with "how to" descriptions, dependencies and CSV import. Use whenever you need to create tasks, break scope into activities, organize a backlog, plan a sprint or structure an execution plan in a project management tool.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If something isn't in any document, it doesn't become a task — it becomes a question for the tech lead.

    line 18
  2. Distinctive:

    Assignee: when team allocation is already known

    line 28
  3. Distinctive:

    No decorative Unicode characters (borders, emoji overload) — they break rendering in several places

    line 50

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

From scope documents to ClickUp tasks

Process for converting a project's planning documents into an executable backlog, without inventing scope.

Rule number one: source of truth

Tasks are born exclusively from the project's source documents — typically three:

  1. Data model (UML/entity diagram)
  2. Functional proposal (what the system does, from the product view)
  3. Execution plan (modules, hours, sequence)

If something isn't in any document, it doesn't become a task — it becomes a question for the tech lead. Generating tasks from imagined scope is the most expensive mistake in this process.

Structure

  • Parent task = module from the execution plan. One to one. If the plan has 7 modules, there are 7 parent tasks.
  • Subtask = verifiable deliverable within the module (3–6 per module is normal). "Verifiable" = you can look at it and say whether it's done.
  • Each subtask carries:
    • Title: infinitive verb + object ("Implement task CRUD", "Set up CI pipeline")
    • "How to" description: 3–8 lines grounded in the project's locked technical decisions — not a generic tutorial
    • Estimate inherited/apportioned from the module's hours in the plan
    • Assignee when team allocation is already known

Sequencing and dependencies

Build the dependency graph between modules BEFORE distributing work (e.g. Setup → Auth → domains in parallel → dashboards → QA). In ClickUp, use waiting on relations between parent tasks; within a module, the subtask order already expresses the sequence.

Deliver alongside it a half-page sequencing guide: the order, the why, and where the team can parallelize.

Import

For volume (20+ tasks), generate a CSV in ClickUp's Spreadsheet Importer format:

Task Name,Parent Task,Description,Time Estimate,Assignee
"Module A — Authentication and org structure",,"...",30h,
"Implement JWT login","Module A — Authentication and org structure","How to: ...",8h,John

Gotchas that have already caused rework:

  • Parent Task references the exact name of the parent task (case-sensitive)
  • Descriptions containing commas/line breaks go inside double quotes
  • Estimates in the format the importer accepts (8h, not 8 hours)
  • No decorative Unicode characters (borders, emoji overload) — they break rendering in several places

Quality checklist before delivering

  • Every task traces back to a passage in a source document
  • No module from the plan is missing a parent task
  • Every subtask has a "how to" grounded in the project's decisions
  • The sum of estimates matches the execution plan's hours (divergence = flag it, don't hide it)
  • Sequencing guide delivered alongside

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.