grok-search
Skill3 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Search the web for real-time information using dual engines: Grok AI (deep analysis + live web) and Tavily (structured results + web scraping). Use when needing current news, prices, latest releases, or any info beyond training data cutoff. Chinese triggers: 搜索, 搜一下, 查一下, 查查, 看看有没有, 最新, 新闻, grok搜索, 网上搜, 帮我查, 了解一下, 什么价格, 上线了吗, 发布了吗.
- Reads credentials
10 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- dengyie/awesome-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 31, 2026
- BlueOcean223/grok-searchtheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
- tanuuuuuuu/dotfilestheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- Frankieli123/grok-skilltheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- kaichen/agent-skillsettheir own version, first seen Sep 15, 2026
- Dianel555/DSkillstheir own version, first seen Sep 6, 2026
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 10
- Frankieli123/grok-skill★ 182same name
- jikssha/openclaw-dae-skills★ 98same name
- dengyie/awesome-skills★ 78same name
- Dianel555/DSkills★ 65same name
- BlueOcean223/grok-search★ 59same name
- Autsunset/grok-search★ 19same name
- kaichen/agent-skillset★ 1same name
- yutakobayashidev/skills★ 1same name
- Lanfei/grok-search-skill★ 0same name
- tanuuuuuuu/dotfiles★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- ace-searchSkill
- bib-verifySkill
- clashverge-rules-debugSkill
- grok-imagineSkill
- hydraSkill
- lit-reviewSkill
- memory-palaceSkill
- readmeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 98
Run both in parallel for important queries, then compare results.
- Distinctive: line 105
If relying on a single source, explicitly state this limitation
- Distinctive: line 107
When sources conflict: present both sides, assess credibility and recency
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Prerequisites
Set these environment variables before use:
GROK_API_BASE— Your Grok-compatible API endpoint (e.g.,http://localhost:8100/v1)GROK_API_KEY— Your API key for the Grok endpointTAVILY_API_KEY— Your Tavily API key (get one free at tavily.com)
Instructions
Search for: $ARGUMENTS
Step 1: Do I Need to Search?
Yes — search when:
- User explicitly asks for external info
- Real-time data needed (latest versions, recent events, current prices)
- Need to verify knowledge accuracy
- Specific URLs, projects, or products' current status
No — skip when:
- Pure code writing/debugging with sufficient context
- User explicitly says not to search
Step 2: Choose Engine
| Scenario | Engine | Why |
| Simple fact lookup | Tavily | Fast, structured, scored results |
| Complex / controversial topic | Dual (both) | Cross-verify, reduce hallucination |
| Need AI deep analysis | Grok | Built-in web search + reasoning |
| Latest news | Tavily (topic=news) | News mode optimized |
| Scrape specific URL | Tavily Extract | Full page content as Markdown |
| High-stakes decision | Dual (both) | ≥2 sources required |
Step 3: Execute
Grok Search (AI-driven, deep analysis)
curl -s ${GROK_API_BASE}/chat/completions \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${GROK_API_KEY}" \
-d '{
"model": "grok-3",
"messages": [
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a search assistant. Search the web and provide accurate, well-sourced answers."},
{"role": "user", "content": "SEARCH_QUERY"}
],
"stream": false
}' | jq -r '.choices[0].message.content'Tavily Search (structured results)
curl -s "https://api.tavily.com/search" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"api_key": "'${TAVILY_API_KEY}'",
"query": "SEARCH_QUERY",
"search_depth": "basic",
"max_results": 5,
"include_answer": true
}' | jq '{answer: .answer, results: [.results[] | {title, url, content, score}]}'Options:
search_depth:basic(fast) oradvanced(thorough)topic:general(default),news,financemax_results: 1-20time_range:day,week,month,year
Tavily Extract (scrape a URL)
curl -s "https://api.tavily.com/extract" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"api_key": "'${TAVILY_API_KEY}'",
"urls": ["https://example.com/page"],
"extract_depth": "basic"
}' | jq '.results[] | {url, raw_content}'Dual Search (cross-verify)
Run both in parallel for important queries, then compare results.
Evidence Standards
- All factual conclusions need ≥2 independent sources for cross-verification
- If relying on a single source, explicitly state this limitation
- Prefer: official docs, Wikipedia, academic databases, authoritative media
- When sources conflict: present both sides, assess credibility and recency
- Confidence levels: High (multiple sources agree) · Medium (few sources) · Low (single source)
Search Complexity
| Level | Description | Strategy |
| L1 - Simple | Single fact, one query | Single engine, direct answer |
| L2 - Medium | Multiple aspects | Primary engine + follow-up |
| L3 - Complex | Multi-faceted | Dual search + structured planning |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

