agentleFS
JetBrainsKnown publisherJetBrains/thinkrail/packages/pi-thinkrail-workflow/skills/shipping-a-pr/SKILL.md

shipping-a-pr

Skill6.8k starsChanged 10 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when finished work needs to ship as a pull request, or when creating, syncing, updating metadata, checking status, monitoring CI, or addressing review comments on a PR. Not for reviewing a PR you are not shipping.

  • Commits and pushes

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Every phase ends through checks.md in the completion mode selected above.

    line 75

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Shipping a PR

The PR lifecycle: ship the workspace's finished work, maintain PR metadata, and keep the PR healthy when requested. One workflow, six phases as sibling docs — enter at the phase the ask names.

Completion modes

  • Snapshot mode is the default for creating, syncing, or updating a PR and for one-time status requests. Take one fresh checks and merge-state snapshot, report pending/failing/indeterminate state as observed, and stop without polling or fixing unrelated state. A push never upgrades the mode by itself.
  • Wait mode requires an explicit remote-completion ask: monitor or watch checks, investigate CI, wait until green, or make the PR merge-ready. Done means every configured check is green, the head is current with its base, and GitHub reports an affirmative merge state; a requested draft is reported as draft, never merge-ready. A repo with no CI is reported as exactly that, never silently green.

Observed, never assumed (applies to every phase)

Git and GitHub state is concurrent and mutable: the base moves, CI lags, mergeability is computed lazily, and this workflow's own steps dirty the tree they just checked. Four rules hold at every step of every phase:

  • Verify at the point of action. An irreversible step — push, gh pr create, gh pr edit, replying to a thread, declaring done — re-checks the exact state it consumes immediately before running. A gate passed earlier does not survive the mutations made since it passed.
  • Keep verification tied to the final tree. Reuse exact prior results while the inputs they cover remain unchanged. Before every code-affecting push, run project-required checks that are missing or invalidated by later code, configuration, dependency, base, or conflict-resolution changes. If a check, cleanup, or self-review causes another relevant edit, reassess and repeat before pushing.
  • Fetch, don't remember. Remote state is read fresh and completely at the moment it's needed: the current body before editing it, --paginate on every listing, git fetch before reasoning about the base.
  • Indeterminate is not affirmative. In wait mode, a pending or still-computing answer (an UNKNOWN merge state, queued checks) is polled until it resolves; done is declared only from observed affirmative state. In snapshot mode, report it as indeterminate without turning the phase into a watch.

Classify the ask

The askPhase docDefault mode
Create a PR — the work is finishedcreating.mdsnapshot
Bring the PR up to date / resolve conflicts with its basesyncing.mdsnapshot
Update the PR title or bodybody.mdsnapshot
Add or refresh screenshots on a PRscreenshots.mdsnapshot
Report the current checks / merge state oncechecks.mdsnapshot
Monitor CI / investigate or fix failing checkschecks.mdwait
Address review commentsreview-comments.mdsnapshot

Read and follow the selected phase doc — the gates and mechanics live only there; never run a phase from this spine's summary. Carry the completion mode selected above into that doc; a later push does not change it. A compound ask ("rebase, verify, and create a PR") is one flow: start at the earliest phase named; the docs chain forward on their own. If the work itself isn't finished — the ask bundles new design or implementation before the ship — that part is not this workflow's; route it per choosing-a-workflow first and come back here when it lands.

Working files

Ephemeral files this workflow uses, all under the workspace's gitignored .thinkrail/context/:

  • pr-body.md — the PR body draft; always passed via --body-file, never inline.
  • pr-shots/ — staged before/after screenshots awaiting attachment.

Both are deleted when the phase that made them completes (screenshots stay while the user is uploading by hand — see screenshots.md).

Ending

Every phase ends through checks.md in the completion mode selected above.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.