defillama-data
Skill3 starsChanged 33 days agoMITView on GitHub
Many protocols have multiple versions. The database tracks both: - Parent protocol (e.g., aave) — used in get_protocol_metrics, aggregates all versions - Sub-protocol (e.g., aave-v3) — individual versions, used in sub_protocol views resolve_entity returns both slug (sub-protocol) and parent_protocol. Use parent_protocol for get_protocol_metrics. Use slug when you need a specific version. Example: resolve_entity({name: "compound"}) returns: - slug: compound-v2, parent_protocol: compound - slug: compound-v3, parent_protocol: compound → Use protocol: "compound" in get_protocol_metrics for the aggregate. All entity params accept single values…
In this repository33 other files it gives its agents.
- llms.txtllms.txt
- alpha-zooSkill
- breadth-chart-analystSkill
- canslim-screenerSkill
- factor-mining-pandaaiSkill
- backtesting-bias-avoidanceSkill
- backtest-reviewSkill
- data-quality-auditSkill
- paper-reproSkill
- pine-backtesterSkill
- stats-test-pickerSkill
- vectorbt-backtestSkill
- vectorbt-optimizeSkill
- akquantSkill
- ashare-pre-st-filterSkill
- cninfo-disclosureSkill
- ctp-apiSkill
- ptrade-strategy-writingSkill
- quant-buddySkill
- ssquant-futuresSkill
- tdxquantSkill
- tqsdk-tradingSkill
- wencai-screenerSkill
- defillama-flowsSkill
- defillama-yieldsSkill
- perp-funding-basisSkill
- pine-debuggerSkill
- pine-developerSkill
- edgar-financialsSkill
- llmquant-equitiesSkill
- llmquant-macroSkill
- llmquant-riskSkill
- openquant-tradingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 67
All entity params accept single values or arrays for comparison:
- Very specific: line 83
All tools accept period (NOT time_range):
- Very specific: line 139
FDV: Never sort by FDV -- unreliable total_supply data produces junk rankings.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!--
Imported from: https://github.com/DefiLlama/defillama-skills
Source Path: defi-data/SKILL.md
Curated for awesome-quant-skills
-->name: defi-data description: Core reference for DefiLlama MCP tools. Maps DeFi questions to the correct tool call with proper parameters. Covers entity conventions, metric interpretation, stock vs flow distinctions, percentage formatting, and error recovery. Use whenever querying DeFi data — protocol TVL, token prices, chain metrics, fees, revenue, yields, stablecoins, bridges, ETFs, hacks, raises, treasuries, or institutional holdings.
DefiLlama MCP Data Reference
Tool Quick Reference
| Question | Tool | Key Params |
| Total DeFi TVL, global volumes | defillama:get_market_totals | metrics (tvl_base, volume_dexs_1d, etc.) |
| Protocol TVL, fees, revenue | defillama:get_protocol_metrics | protocol, metrics |
| Chain TVL, gas fees, REV | defillama:get_chain_metrics | chain, metrics |
| Token price, mcap, ATH | defillama:get_token_prices | token |
| Category rankings | defillama:get_category_metrics | category |
| Pool APY, lending rates | defillama:get_yield_pools | token, chain, category |
| Stablecoin supply | defillama:get_stablecoin_supply | stablecoin, chain |
| ETF inflows/outflows | defillama:get_etf_flows | token (bitcoin/ethereum) |
| Bridge volume | defillama:get_bridge_flows | bridge, chain |
| CEX volume | defillama:get_cex_volumes | cex |
| Open interest | defillama:get_open_interest | protocol, chain |
| Hacks/exploits | defillama:get_events | event_type: "hacks" |
| Fundraising | defillama:get_events | event_type: "raises" |
| Protocol events | defillama:get_events | event_type: "protocol_events" |
| Protocol treasury | defillama:get_treasury | treasury |
| Institutional holdings | defillama:get_dat_holdings | institution, token |
| Token unlocks | defillama:get_token_unlocks | token, query_type (chart, window, day, window_all, ratio, market_window) |
| Token TVL in protocols | defillama:get_token_tvl | token, protocol |
| Oracle coverage | defillama:get_oracle_metrics | oracle |
| User activity | defillama:get_user_activity | protocol, chain |
| Income statement | defillama:get_income_statement | protocol |
| Protocol metadata, URLs, audit | defillama:get_protocol_info | protocol, category, tag, has_token, chain |
| Chain metadata, type, L2 parent | defillama:get_chain_info | chain, chain_type |
| List valid categories | defillama:list_categories | type (protocol, token, chain) |
| Unknown entity slug | defillama:resolve_entity | name |
Entity Conventions
- Protocols: lowercase-hyphenated slugs (
aave,uniswap,compound-v3) - Chains: lowercase (
ethereum,solana,arbitrum) - Tokens:
coingecko:prefix (coingecko:ethereum,coingecko:bitcoin,coingecko:usd-coin) - CEX: slug includes suffix (
binance-cex,coinbase-cex,htx,gate-io) - Categories: Title case (
Lending,DEX,Derivatives)
Protocol vs Sub-Protocol
Many protocols have multiple versions. The database tracks both:
- Parent protocol (e.g.,
aave) — used inget_protocol_metrics, aggregates all versions - Sub-protocol (e.g.,
aave-v3) — individual versions, used in sub_protocol views
resolve_entity returns both slug (sub-protocol) and parent_protocol. Use parent_protocol for get_protocol_metrics. Use slug when you need a specific version.
Example: resolve_entity({name: "compound"}) returns:
- slug: compound-v2, parent_protocol: compound
- slug: compound-v3, parent_protocol: compound
→ Use
protocol: "compound"in get_protocol_metrics for the aggregate.
Array Support
All entity params accept single values or arrays for comparison:
protocol: "aave"orprotocol: ["aave", "lido", "compound"]chain: "ethereum"orchain: ["ethereum", "solana"]token: "coingecko:ethereum"ortoken: ["coingecko:ethereum", "coingecko:bitcoin"]
Entity Resolution
Try tools directly for well-known entities — works 80%+ of the time. Use defillama:resolve_entity only when:
- Unsure of exact slug
- Tool returns 0 rows
- Need to disambiguate (e.g., "compound" → compound-v2, compound-v3)
- Need to find the parent_protocol slug
Period Parameter
All tools accept period (NOT time_range):
current(default) -- latest snapshot7d,30d,90d,180d,365d-- rolling windows
For custom date ranges, use start_date and end_date (YYYY-MM-DD format) instead of period. If start_date is set without end_date, it defaults to today.
Critical Conventions
Stock vs Flow
Different aggregation rules -- getting this wrong produces nonsensical results:
- Stock (point-in-time snapshots):
tvl,price,mcap-- NEVER sum across dates - Flow (cumulative over period):
fees_1d,revenue_1d,volume-- CAN sum across dates
Percentage Formatting
Two different conventions in the data:
*_pct_changecolumns = decimals (e.g., -0.13 = -13%, 0.35 = +35%). Multiply by 100 for display.apycolumns = already percentages (e.g., 2.32 = 2.32%). Do NOT multiply by 100.
TVL Components
Components are mutually exclusive -- never double-add:
tvl_base= default TVL (excludes liquid staking and double-counted)tvl_ls_only= liquid staking portion not in tvl_basetvl_dc_only= double-counted portion not in tvl_basetvl_ls_and_dc= both LS and DC- Total with LS+DC =
tvl_base + tvl_ls_only + tvl_dc_only + tvl_ls_and_dc
Fee and Revenue
fees= gross payments by usersrevenue= protocol's cut (fees - payments to LPs/stakers)holder_revenue= buybacks + dividends to token holders- Chain-level:
chain_fees(gas),chain_revenue,chain_mev,app_fees(protocol fees on chain),app_revenue
Metric Name Patterns
Protocol metrics follow these patterns:
- TVL:
tvl_base,tvl_staking,tvl_borrowed,tvl_pool2,tvl_treasury,tvl_vesting - Flows (with suffixes
_1d/_7d/_30d/_90d/_180d/_365d/_ytd/_alltime/_annualised):fees,revenue,holder_revenue,incentive - Volume (same suffixes):
volume_dexs,volume_aggregators,volume_derivatives,volume_aggr_derivatives,volume_options - Market:
price,mcap,fdv,fdv_outstanding,token_volume,ps_ratio,pf_ratio - pct_change variants only available on
_currentviews
Chain metrics use chain_fees, chain_revenue, chain_mev, app_fees, app_revenue instead of fees, revenue.
Daily views only have the _1d suffix for flows/volumes.
Important Gotchas
- Category column:
get_protocol_metricshas NO category column. Useget_category_metricsfor category-level data. - FDV: Never sort by FDV -- unreliable
total_supplydata produces junk rankings. Sort bymcapinstead. - Valuation:
ps_ratio= mcap / annualised revenue.pf_ratio= mcap / annualised fees. Lower = potentially undervalued. - Metric validation: Protocol/chain/category metrics are validated against actual DB columns. Invalid metrics return a suggestion for the closest match.
- NULL values: NULL means data unavailable, NOT $0. Do not report NULL as zero.
- Params accept string or array:
protocol: "aave"orprotocol: ["aave", "lido"]. Param names are singular (protocolnotprotocols). - sort_by format: String like
"tvl_base desc"or"fees_1d desc".
Examples
Example 1:
User: "What is Aave's TVL?"
Tool call: defillama:get_protocol_metrics(protocol: "aave", metrics: ["tvl_base"])
Example 2:
User: "Top 5 chains by fees"
Tool call: defillama:get_chain_metrics(sort_by: "chain_fees_1d desc", limit: 5)
Example 3:
User: "ETH price history over 90 days"
Tool call: defillama:get_token_prices(token: "coingecko:ethereum", period: "90d")
Example 4: User: "Compare ETH price and Ethereum chain TVL" Tool calls in parallel:
defillama:get_token_prices(token: "coingecko:ethereum")defillama:get_chain_metrics(chain: "ethereum")
Example 5:
User: "Biggest DeFi hacks this year"
Tool call: defillama:get_events(event_type: "hacks", sort_by: "amount desc", limit: 10, period: "365d")
Example 6:
User: "Aave TVL from Jan to Mar 2025"
Tool call: defillama:get_protocol_metrics(protocol: "aave", metrics: ["tvl_base"], start_date: "2025-01-01", end_date: "2025-03-31")
Error Recovery
- 0 rows returned -> call
defillama:resolve_entity(name: "...")-> retry with the correct slug - Wrong data -> verify you're using the right tool (protocol vs chain vs category)
- Ambiguous entity -> call
resolve_entityto see all matching slugs, then pick the right one
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

