seo-audit-full
Skill746 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Advanced full SEO audit skill. Runs its own full workflow from local scripts, including the basic SEO checks plus PageSpeed, social metadata, and advanced review modules when available.
- Reads credentials
- Installs packages
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ahonn/dotfilesword for word, first seen Sep 10, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- ahonn/dotfiles★ 62100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.
- seo-auditSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
29 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 15 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈14
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
15
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 21
Use seo-audit-full when the user asks for:
- Very specific: line 57
Do not run seo-audit-full PageSpeed checks without a PageSpeed API key supplied by --api-key, PAGESPEED_API_KEY, or …
- Very specific: line 113
If yes → run: open reports/example-com-full-audit.html
- Distinctive: line 134
Run full scripts from this directory.
- Very specific: line 173
If PageSpeed fails because Google returns a quota/API-key error after a key was provided, keep the audit running and render the PageSpeed …
- Very specific: line 190
Check common staging/test hosts before robots.txt: test., staging., dev., preview., beta., uat.
- Very specific: line 191
Fail: when a staging/test subdomain is publicly accessible, closely mirrors the production site, and is not protected by authentication, …
- Distinctive: line 192
Warn: when a staging/test subdomain is publicly accessible but similarity or index protection cannot be confirmed.
- Very specific: line 193
Pass: when no public staging/test subdomain is detected, or detected staging hosts are protected by authentication, non-200 access, …
- Very specific: line 198
Place this as the first module in {{site_checks_html}}, before the Crawlability table.
- Very specific: line 200
Use check-site.py sitemap_inventory output to summarize first-level directories, URL counts, inferred page types, and one representative …
- Distinctive: line 201
Treat this as a site-level map, not a pass/fail single-page SEO audit.
- Very specific: line 202
Use status info unless sitemap URLs cannot be parsed.
- Very specific: line 203
Always include a next-step note: the user can continue with deeper full audits by selecting representative sample URLs from major …
- Distinctive: line 219
Pass: if contact is reachable via any of: dedicated contact page (HTTP 200) · About page with contact details · footer/nav mailto, email, …
- Distinctive: line 220
Fail: only when no contact pathway exists anywhere on the site
- Distinctive: line 243
If no contact page, check the About page body for email, social, or contact details
- Distinctive: line 245
Exists Pass: if any contact pathway is found
- Distinctive: line 246
Exists Fail: only when no contact information is found anywhere
- Distinctive: line 247
Reachable Pass: if a contact page link or contact details appear in footer/nav
- Distinctive: line 248
Reachable Warn: if contact is only reachable inside About page content, not directly in footer/nav
- Very specific: line 249
Do not recommend creating /contact when About or footer already expose contact info
- Distinctive: line 258
Treat Schema as a quality check, not only a presence check.
- Distinctive: line 260
Fail: when JSON-LD is invalid, the expected schema type is missing, required fields are missing, or localized schema clearly points to the …
- Very specific: line 261
Warn: when recommended fields are missing, nested fields are incomplete, multilingual pages lack inLanguage, or localized schema cannot be …
- Distinctive: line 262
Pass: only when the expected schema type is present, required fields are present, no conflicts are found, and localized schema matches the …
- Distinctive: line 276
Do not contradict script output unless you have additional observable evidence
- Very specific: line 320
Do not use overall status for the Lighthouse Scores badge.
- Very specific: line 334
Always include the official diagnostic link: https://pagespeed.web.dev/
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
seo-audit-full — Advanced Full SEO Audit
This skill runs a full single-page SEO audit from the seo-audit-full directory.
It does not route to seo-audit when only a URL is provided.
When to Use This Skill
Use seo-audit-full when the user asks for:
- "seo-audit-full"
- "full SEO audit"
- "advanced SEO audit"
- "technical SEO audit"
- "deep audit"
- "comprehensive SEO review"
- "audit everything"
URL-only requests are valid. When external datasets are not supplied, run the full public-signal workflow and clearly note missing data sources in the report.
Input Expected
| Input | Required | Notes |
| Page URL | Yes | The primary page to audit |
| Primary keyword | Recommended | Improves content relevance scoring |
| PageSpeed API key | Yes | Required for full audit PageSpeed checks. Ask at the start and do not run PageSpeed without it. |
| Raw HTML or page content | Optional | Enables more accurate content checks when supplied |
| GSC / crawl / analytics data | Optional | Include when supplied, otherwise mark unavailable |
| Competitor benchmark data | Optional | Include when supplied |
At the start of a full audit, ask the user for a PageSpeed Insights API key:
For PageSpeed checks, please provide a Google PageSpeed Insights API key.
Get one here: https://developers.google.com/speed/docs/insights/v5/get-started
Open "Acquiring and using an API key" → "Get a Key".
If you do not provide one, I will stop before running the full audit because
PageSpeed is a required full-audit module.Do not run seo-audit-full PageSpeed checks without a PageSpeed API key supplied
by --api-key, PAGESPEED_API_KEY, or GOOGLE_PAGESPEED_API_KEY. If the key is
missing, stop and ask the user to configure it instead of rendering a full report
with missing PageSpeed data.
Architecture: Full = Core + Performance + Advanced
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ seo-audit-full Workflow │
│ │
│ Phase 1: Run core scripts (./scripts/) │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ check-site.py → robots.txt, sitemap, 404, URL │ │
│ │ check-page.py → title, H1, meta desc, slug │ │
│ │ check-schema.py → JSON-LD validation │ │
│ │ fetch-page.py → raw HTML for analysis │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ Phase 2: Run performance + full-only scripts (./scripts/) │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ check-pagespeed.py → Lighthouse scores + metrics │ │
│ │ check-social.py → OG Tags + Twitter Card │ │
│ │ (more scripts added here as modules grow) │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ Phase 3: LLM-only advanced checks │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ E-E-A-T content quality scoring │ │
│ │ Duplicate content signals │ │
│ │ Anchor text quality assessment │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Output
Produce an Advanced Full SEO Audit Report by filling the template at assets/report-template.html, then save it to a file — never print raw HTML to the terminal.
File naming: reports/<hostname>-<slug>-full-audit.html
https://example.com/blog/best-tools → reports/example-com-blog-best-tools-full-audit.html
https://example.com/ → reports/example-com-full-audit.htmlAfter saving, tell the user:
✅ Full Report saved → reports/example-com-full-audit.html
Open it now? (yes / no)If yes → run: open reports/example-com-full-audit.html
Template placeholders — fill each independently:
| Placeholder | Content |
{{summary_verdict}} | One sentence: total checks run, how many failed/warned/passed |
{{summary_critical_html}} | <li> per critical item, or <li class="summary-empty">None</li> |
{{summary_warnings_html}} | <li> per warning item, or <li class="summary-empty">None</li> |
{{summary_passing_html}} | <li> per passing check, or <li class="summary-empty">None</li> |
{{pagespeed_checks_html}} | Full PageSpeed module using check-pagespeed.py output |
{{site_checks_html}} | Site-level check tables |
{{eeat_checks_html}} | E-E-A-T trust page table |
{{page_checks_html}} | Page-level check tables, including full-only additions |
{{priority_actions_html}} | Ordered priority action list |
{{insights_html}} | Optional finding walkthrough cards |
Scripts
Run full scripts from this directory. All output is structured JSON — use it directly as evidence.
Dependencies: pip install requests
Phase 1: Core scripts
# 1. site-level checks (robots.txt + sitemap.xml + 404 + URL canonicalization)
python scripts/check-site.py https://example.com
# 2. page-level checks (H1, title, meta description, canonical, URL slug)
python scripts/check-page.py https://example.com --keyword "primary keyword"
# 3. fetch raw HTML for downstream scripts
python scripts/fetch-page.py https://example.com --output /tmp/page.html
# 4. JSON-LD schema validation
python scripts/check-schema.py --file /tmp/page.htmlPhase 2: Full-only scripts
# 5. PageSpeed / Lighthouse checks
python scripts/check-pagespeed.py https://example.com --strategy mobile --timeout 180 --api-key "USER_PROVIDED_KEY"
# If no key was provided, do not run this command. Ask the user to configure a PageSpeed API key first.
# 6. Social tags: OG + Twitter Card validation
python scripts/check-social.py --file /tmp/page.html
# Or directly from URL:
python scripts/check-social.py https://example.comEach script exits with code 0 (all pass/warn) or 1 (any fail/error).
PageSpeed can take 200 seconds. Use a 180-second timeout by default. If it
still times out, mark the Page Speed module as error and state that the
PageSpeed API timed out; do not treat that as confirmed page performance failure.
If PageSpeed fails because Google returns a quota/API-key error after a key was
provided, keep the audit running and render the PageSpeed module as error with
this instruction:
Get a PageSpeed API key at https://developers.google.com/speed/docs/insights/v5/get-started → "Acquiring and using an API key" → "Get a Key".
Scope — Full Audit Check Whitelist
Full runs its own core checks plus the full-only items marked ★ below.
Site-Level Checks (in {{site_checks_html}})
Core checks:
- Sitemap URL Inventory · Staging Subdomain Indexation · robots.txt · sitemap.xml · 404 Handling · URL Canonicalization · i18n / hreflang
Staging Subdomain Indexation rules:
- Check common staging/test hosts before robots.txt:
test.,staging.,dev.,preview.,beta.,uat. - Fail when a staging/test subdomain is publicly accessible, closely mirrors the production site, and is not protected by authentication,
noindex, or a blockingrobots.txt. - Warn when a staging/test subdomain is publicly accessible but similarity or index protection cannot be confirmed.
- Pass when no public staging/test subdomain is detected, or detected staging hosts are protected by authentication, non-200 access,
noindex, orDisallow: /. - Explain the impact as duplicate indexable pages: Google may treat
test.example.comandwww.example.comas separate but near-identical URLs, splitting ranking signals and competing with the production site. - Recommended fixes: add Basic Auth/password protection first; also block crawlers on the staging host with
User-agent: *+Disallow: /; add page-levelnoindexif pages can still be accessed.
Sitemap URL Inventory rules:
- Place this as the first module in
{{site_checks_html}}, before the Crawlability table. - Render it as its own table with columns: Directory · URL Count · Page Type · Example Page.
- Use
check-site.pysitemap_inventoryoutput to summarize first-level directories, URL counts, inferred page types, and one representative example URL. - Treat this as a site-level map, not a pass/fail single-page SEO audit.
- Use status
infounless sitemap URLs cannot be parsed; do not penalize a site for having many or few URLs in a directory without deeper evidence. - Always include a next-step note: the user can continue with deeper full audits by selecting representative sample URLs from major directories such as
/blog/,/tools/,/alternatives/,/templates/, or/use-cases/.
Page Speed Checks (in {{pagespeed_checks_html}})
Full-only:
- Lighthouse category scores: Performance · Accessibility · Best Practices · SEO
- Lab metrics: FCP · LCP · TBT · CLS · Speed Index
- Final URL and screenshot availability
E-E-A-T Checks (in {{eeat_checks_html}})
Core checks:
- About Us · Contact · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Media/Partners (only if present)
Contact logic (Contact row only):
- A dedicated
/contactpage is not required - Pass if contact is reachable via any of: dedicated contact page (HTTP 200) · About page with contact details · footer/nav mailto, email, social links, or contact form
- Fail only when no contact pathway exists anywhere on the site
- Missing
/contactalone is not a fail when About or footer/nav already expose contact info
E-E-A-T infrastructure rules — two layers per trust page:
- Layer 1 — Exists: HTTP 200 for the trust page URL (Contact uses Contact-specific rules above)
- Layer 2 — Reachable: linked from footer or main nav
| Page | Required |
| About Us | Yes |
| Contact | Yes — dedicated page optional; About or footer/nav contact details satisfy this |
| Privacy Policy | Yes |
| Terms of Service | Yes |
| Media / Partners | No — include only if present |
Status rules (About, Privacy, Terms, Media/Partners):
- Page missing (non-200) → Fail
- Page exists but not linked in footer/nav → Warn
- Page exists and linked in footer/nav → Pass
- Optional page missing → skip, do not include row
Contact-specific rules:
- Try common paths (
/contact,/contact-us) — HTTP 200 counts as Exists - If no contact page, check the About page body for email, social, or contact details
- Also scan homepage footer and nav for
mailto:, visible email, social links, or a contact form - Exists Pass if any contact pathway is found
- Exists Fail only when no contact information is found anywhere
- Reachable Pass if a contact page link or contact details appear in footer/nav
- Reachable Warn if contact is only reachable inside About page content, not directly in footer/nav
- Do not recommend creating
/contactwhen About or footer already expose contact info
Page-Level Checks (in {{page_checks_html}}), output in this exact order:
Core checks: URL Slug · Title Tag · Meta Description · H1 Tag · Canonical Tag · Image Alt Text · Word Count · Keyword Placement · Heading Structure · Internal Links · Schema (JSON-LD)
Schema (JSON-LD) rules:
- Treat Schema as a quality check, not only a presence check.
- Validate JSON-LD parseability, expected
@type, required fields, recommended rich-result fields, nested fields, and primary-type conflicts. - Fail when JSON-LD is invalid, the expected schema type is missing, required fields are missing, or localized schema clearly points to the wrong language/URL.
- Warn when recommended fields are missing, nested fields are incomplete, multilingual pages lack
inLanguage, or localized schema cannot be fully confirmed. - Pass only when the expected schema type is present, required fields are present, no conflicts are found, and localized schema matches the current page language/URL when applicable.
- For multilingual pages, each language version should have its own schema with matching
inLanguage, language-specific headline/description where present, andurl/mainEntityOfPagepointing to the current localized canonical URL.
★ Full-only additions:
- OG Tags — og:title, og:description, og:image, og:type, og:url presence and validity
- Twitter Card — twitter:card type, title/description/image (with OG fallback detection)
How to Use Script JSON Output
Same rules across full audit modules — map each field's status directly to the report check table:
status→pass/warn/fail/error→ badge in reportdetail→ starting point for Evidence line- Do not contradict script output unless you have additional observable evidence
For check-site.py output:
staging_subdomains.status→ Staging Subdomain Indexation row statusstaging_subdomains.detail→ Staging Subdomain Indexation row detailstaging_subdomains.public_hosts→ evidence for public staging/test hostsstaging_subdomains.similar_hosts→ fail evidence for production-like staging duplicatesrobots.status→ robots.txt row statussitemap.status→ sitemap.xml row statussitemap_inventory.status→ Sitemap URL Inventory module statussitemap_inventory.directories[]→ table rows withpath,url_count,page_type, andexample_urlsitemap_inventory.detail→ short explanatory note below the inventory table
For check-schema.py output:
status→ Schema (JSON-LD) row statusdetail→ Schema (JSON-LD) row detailparse_errors→ fail evidence for malformed JSON-LDschemas[].fields_missing→ fail evidence for missing required schema fieldsschemas[].recommended_missingandschemas[].nested_issues→ warning evidencelocalized_schema.status→ language/URL alignment status for multilingual schemalocalized_schema.issues→ evidence for schema language or URL mismatch
For check-social.py output:
og.status→ OG Tags row statustwitter_card.status→ Twitter Card row statusog.fields.*→ individual field details for the detail celltwitter_card.fields.*→ individual field details, note fallback fields
For check-pagespeed.py output:
status→ overall Page Speed statuscategory_status→ Lighthouse Scores badge statusmetric_status→ Core Lab Metrics badge statusfinal_url→ Final URL linecategories.performance.score→ Performance scorecategories.accessibility.score→ Accessibility scorecategories["best-practices"].score→ Best Practices scorecategories.seo.score→ SEO scorecompact_metrics.fcp.display_value→ FCPcompact_metrics.lcp.display_value→ LCPcompact_metrics.tbt.display_value→ TBTcompact_metrics.cls.display_value→ CLScompact_metrics.si.display_value→ Speed Indexscreenshottruthy → Screenshot available
Do not use overall status for the Lighthouse Scores badge. Category scores use
Lighthouse thresholds: 90–100 pass, 50–89 warn, 0–49 fail. Example: Performance
60, Accessibility 84, Best Practices 100, SEO 100 means category_status is
warn. If LCP or Speed Index fails, metric_status and overall status may be
fail while the Lighthouse Scores panel remains warn.
Inside {{pagespeed_checks_html}}, include a short Priority Actions list after
the score/metric cards. Keep it to 2–4 concise items based on failing or warning
PageSpeed fields:
- LCP slow → optimize hero media, preload critical image, reduce render-blocking CSS
- Speed Index slow → defer non-critical scripts and reduce above-the-fold JS/CSS
- TBT high → split long tasks and delay third-party tags
- Performance score warning/fail → prioritize the biggest Lighthouse opportunities
Always include the official diagnostic link:
https://pagespeed.web.dev/
LLM Review Instructions
Core LLM reviews
Resolve every llm_review_required: true field before writing the report:
H1 semantic judgment, Title keyword position, URL Slug evaluation, and Meta
Description quality must all receive an explicit judgment.
Full-only LLM checks
OG Tags quality (always review):
og:title : Does it differ meaningfully from <title>? It should be optimized for social sharing.
og:description : Is it compelling for social feeds? Different focus than meta description is OK.
og:image : Is the URL an actual image path (not a page URL)?Twitter Card completeness:
If twitter:card is "summary_large_image", twitter:image (or og:image fallback) must be
at least 300x157px. Flag if the image URL looks like a small icon or favicon.Recommended Workflow
- Acknowledge full scope — confirm this is a full audit
- Infer primary keyword — read the page H1, title, and first paragraph unless the user provided one
- Phase 1: Run core scripts — check-site → check-page → fetch-page → check-schema
- Phase 2: Run full-only scripts — verify PageSpeed API key exists, then run check-pagespeed → check-social
- Core checks — 404 handling, URL canonicalization, E-E-A-T trust pages, i18n/hreflang
- PageSpeed checks — summarize Lighthouse category scores and lab metrics
- LLM-only advanced checks — E-E-A-T content quality, duplicate content signals, anchor text quality
- Summarize findings — Evidence / Impact / Fix format
- Priority actions — top 5 highest-impact fixes with effort/impact tags
- Render report — save to
reports/<hostname>-<slug>-full-audit.html
Report Detail Writing Rules
Use strict formatting:
Pass → one short phrase. No lists, no elaboration.
Warn → one <div class="detail-issue"> with ≤2 bullet points. One <div class="detail-fix">.
Fail → same as Warn. Lead with the exact failure.
Mandatory Finding Format
**Finding: [Finding Title]**
- **Evidence:** [Observable fact, data point, or marked assumption]
- **Impact:** [SEO / UX consequence]
- **Fix:** [Actionable recommendation with example]For Priority Actions, add effort/impact tags:
1. [High Impact / Low Effort] Fix og:image — social shares currently show no preview.Reference Files
- Detailed audit modules and field definitions: references/REFERENCE.md
- Final HTML report template: assets/report-template.html
- PageSpeed validation script: scripts/check-pagespeed.py
- Social tags validation script: scripts/check-social.py
- Core scripts: scripts/ (check-site, check-page, check-schema, fetch-page)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

