concept-explainer
Skill12 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Explains complex or technical concepts clearly at the right level for the audience, using layered depth, concrete analogies, worked examples, and checks for understanding — adapting from ELI5 to expert. Use this skill when the user asks to "explain X", "ELI5", "help me understand X", "what is X and how does it work", "explain this like I'm a beginner/expert", "break down this concept", or wants a confusing topic made intuitive. Works for technical, scientific, financial, or abstract topics.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Anchor to prior knowledge: Start from something the learner already understands and bridge to the new idea ("you know how X works?
- Distinctive: line 20
Give the precise definition: after the intuition, not before.
- Distinctive: line 51
Intuition before formality: Never open with the textbook definition.
- Distinctive: line 53
Use concrete numbers and scenarios, not abstractions piled on abstractions.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Concept Explainer
Overview
Make hard ideas click. Calibrate to the learner's level, build from what they already know, use a vivid analogy, then layer in precision and a concrete example. End by checking understanding.
Keywords: explain, ELI5, teach, understand, intuition, analogy, mental model, break down, simplify, deep dive, learning, tutoring.
Workflow
- Calibrate the level. Infer or ask the audience level: child / curious novice / practitioner / expert. Match vocabulary and assumed background. When unstated, default to "smart person new to this field" and offer to go deeper.
- Anchor to prior knowledge. Start from something the learner already understands and bridge to the new idea ("you know how X works? This is like that, except…").
- Lead with one strong analogy. Pick a single, accurate analogy (see techniques in
references/techniques.md). State where the analogy holds and, crucially, where it breaks down — bad analogies that aren't bounded create misconceptions. - Give the precise definition after the intuition, not before. Intuition first, formality second.
- Show a concrete worked example. Make the abstract tangible with real numbers, code, or a scenario.
- Layer depth progressively. Structure as: one-sentence gist → short paragraph → deeper mechanics. Let the reader stop at the depth they need.
- Address the common misconception for the topic head-on ("A lot of people think X — actually…").
- Check understanding. End with a quick question, a "you'd now be able to…" statement, or an invitation to go deeper.
Decision Framework
| Audience | Style |
| Child (ELI5) | Everyday analogy, no jargon, short sentences, concrete objects |
| Curious novice | Analogy + plain definition + one example; define each term once |
| Practitioner | Less analogy, more mechanics, trade-offs, when to use it |
| Expert | Skip basics; focus on nuance, edge cases, precise terminology |
Worked Example (explaining "database index", novice level)
Gist: An index is like the index at the back of a book — instead of reading every page to find a topic, you jump straight to it.
How it works: A database without an index scans every row to find matches (slow, like flipping through all pages). An index keeps a sorted lookup of a column's values pointing to the matching rows, so the database can binary-search instead of scanning.
Where the analogy breaks: unlike a book index, a database index has to be updated on every write, so it speeds reads but slightly slows inserts and uses extra storage.
Example:
CREATE INDEX ON users(email)turns "find the user with this email" from scanning a million rows into a handful of lookups.Check: Given that, why might you not index a column you rarely search but write to constantly?
See examples/explain-recursion.md for a multi-level explanation.
Best Practices
- Intuition before formality. Never open with the textbook definition.
- One analogy, well-bounded — and always say where it breaks.
- Use concrete numbers and scenarios, not abstractions piled on abstractions.
- Progressive disclosure: gist → detail → depth, so readers self-select.
- Define jargon the first time; don't assume.
- Confirm understanding instead of assuming it landed.
Common Pitfalls
- Jargon to explain jargon — circular and useless to a novice.
- Unbounded analogies that quietly create misconceptions.
- Wrong level — ELI5-ing an expert (condescending) or overwhelming a beginner.
- Definition dump with no intuition or example.
- No worked example, leaving the idea abstract.
- Sacrificing accuracy for simplicity to the point of being wrong — simplify, don't falsify.
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- jaskirat1616/grok-skills★ 22100% same
- JayRHa/AgentSkills★ 12100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- duyet/clickhouse-monitoring★ 305same name
- fworks-tech/agenthood★ 3same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository75 other files it gives its agents.
- 0-templateSkill
- ab-test-analyzerSkill
- adr-authorSkill
- api-designerSkill
- api-docs-writerSkill
- aws-cost-optimizerSkill
- bash-script-hardeningSkill
- blog-post-writerSkill
- book-summarizerSkill
- changelog-keeperSkill
- chart-chooserSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- competitive-analysisSkill
- cover-letter-writerSkill
- cron-schedulerSkill
- data-pipeline-architectSkill
- debug-detectiveSkill
- decision-matrixSkill
- dependency-upgraderSkill
- dockerfile-proSkill
- email-composerSkill
- error-handling-patternsSkill
- event-plannerSkill
- flashcard-generatorSkill
- gdpr-data-mapperSkill
- gift-advisorSkill
- github-actions-builderSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- habit-builderSkill
- incident-postmortemSkill
- interview-prepSkill
- job-description-writerSkill
- json-schema-authorSkill
- kubernetes-manifest-authorSkill
- language-tutorSkill
- meal-plan-builderSkill
- meeting-summarizerSkill
- mermaid-diagram-builderSkill
- nginx-config-proSkill
- observability-setupSkill
- okr-writerSkill
- pandas-data-cleaningSkill
- people-dataSkill
- performance-profilerSkill
- personal-budget-plannerSkill
- presentation-builderSkill
- project-plannerSkill
- prompt-engineerSkill
- proofreaderSkill
- public-speaking-coachSkill
- rag-pipeline-designerSkill
- readme-generatorSkill
- refactoring-guideSkill
- regex-architectSkill
- release-notes-writerSkill
- resume-writerSkill
- salary-negotiatorSkill
- secrets-managerSkill
- secure-code-reviewSkill
- secure-password-policySkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

