qualitative-paper-writer
Skill0 starsChanged 10 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
护理学/医学质性研究论文全流程写作辅助工具。覆盖从研究设计到投稿的完整管线。当用户提到'质性研究'、'qualitative'、'访谈研究'、'现象学'、'扎根理论'、'民族志'、'ethnography'、'phenomenology'、'grounded theory'、'COREQ'、'主题分析'、'thematic analysis'、'数据饱和'、'saturation'、'质性论文'、'写质性'、'质性投稿'时触发。支持中英文双语。适用于 IJNS、JAN、BMC Nursing、Qualitative Health Research 等接受质性研究的 SCI 期刊。
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- ethics-application-writerSkill
- github-to-skillsSkill
- interactive-paper-mentorSkill
- irt-analysisSkill
- kepu-aigc-reducerSkill
- latex-paper-enSkill
- latex-thesis-zhSkill
- medical-ml-predictorSkill
- medical-paper-writerSkill
- medical-research-aiSkill
- medical-research-registrationSkill
- medical-science-writerSkill
- ophtho-exam-tutor-v4Skill
- pdca-project-generatorSkill
- qcc-project-generatorSkill
- reference-checkerSkill
- research-brainstormSkill
- research-project-generatorSkill
- research-projectSkill
- scale-development-teachingSkill
- scifi-short-storySkill
- Skill Evolution ManagerSkill
- skill-managerSkill
- subject-choice-explorerSkill
- typst-paperSkill
- virtual-research-data-generatorSkill
- web-fetcherSkill
- x-collectSkill
- x-createSkill
- x-filterSkill
- x-publishSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.