prepare-walkthrough-presentation
Skill67 starsChanged 52 days agoMITView on GitHub
Transforms validated /linear-walkthrough artifacts into one presentation-ready deck outline per major codebase component. Use when the user asks to create a presentation, prepare a walkthrough deck, build an onboarding deck, produce an architecture review deck, or summarize a codebase for a technical audience. Requires walkthrough directory output -- reads unified walkthrough, per-section files, validation reports, coverage maps, entry points, and open questions -- then orchestrates four parallel agent phases to produce slide outlines with speaker notes, evidence references, and suggested visuals.
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- rules/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- research/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/backlog-before-work.mdcCursor rule
- agent-browserSkill
- beadsSkill
- cccSkill
- copy-editingSkill
- daily-releasesSkill
- graph-engineeringSkill
- rebaseSkill
- receiving-pr-reviewsSkill
- topic-specialistSkill
- workshop-question-framingSkill
- agent-browserSkill
- boilSkill
- commit-stagedSkill
- complete-milestoneSkill
- cove-prompt-designSkill
- create-merge-request-changelogSkill
- create-milestoneSkill
- design-anti-patternsSkill
- evaluate-sdlc-layersSkill
- example-argument-substitutionSkill
- external-pattern-integratorSkill
- fact-checkSkill
- ghSkill
- git-history-reconSkill
- group-items-to-milestoneSkill
- knowledge-explorerSkill
- linear-walkthroughSkill
- modern-gitSkill
- readme-badgerSkill
- refresh-researchSkill
- research-curatorSkill
- session-historianSkill
- seven-prompt-content-engineSkill
- skill-research-processSkill
- start-milestoneSkill
- universe-of-thoughtsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 32
Read these artifacts from the walkthrough directory (all paths below are relative to that directory):
- Very specific: line 45
Before starting Phase 1, verify all required walkthrough artifacts exist.
- Very specific: line 68
Read presentation/component-index.md to get the component list and deck-to-component mapping.
- Distinctive: line 92
Verify all expected deck outline files exist.
- Distinctive: line 119
Read all validation reports.
- Very specific: line 120
If critical corrections exist (unsupported claims, invented architecture, incorrect sequencing), spawn a new general-purpose agent per …
- Distinctive: line 146
If the crosswalk or any deck outline exceeds 25k characters, apply the large file write strategy using Strategy A (multi-file split).
- Distinctive: line 162
Use concise, high-signal slide text — avoid dense paragraphs.
- Distinctive: line 163
Put detailed explanation in speaker notes.
- Distinctive: line 165
Use consistent naming, terms, and structural patterns across all decks.
- Distinctive: line 169
Every substantive slide references the walkthrough sections, validation reports, or source artifacts that support it.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Prepare Walkthrough Presentation
Transform validated /linear-walkthrough output into one presentation-ready deck outline per major codebase component. Each deck explains what the component is, how it works, how it connects to the system, how it is developed and operated, and what risks remain.
Walkthrough directory: <walkthrough-directory> (default: ./walkthrough/ in the current directory).
Output directory: <walkthrough-directory>/presentation/ (created if it does not exist).
Workflow
flowchart TD
Start(["Invoke /prepare-walkthrough-presentation"]) --> P1
P1["Phase 1: Component Extraction and Deck Planning<br>1 agent — read walkthrough outputs, identify components,<br>build deck plan per component"] --> P1Out
P1Out["Artifacts:<br>presentation/component-index.md<br>presentation/deck-plans/component-deck-plan-{name}.md"] --> P2
P2["Phase 2: Deck Generation<br>N parallel agents — build narrative and generate<br>full deck outline per component in one pass"] --> P2Out
P2Out["Artifacts:<br>presentation/decks/component-deck-outline-{name}.md"] --> P3
P3["Phase 3: Validation<br>M parallel agents — fact-check decks against<br>walkthrough sources, check cross-deck consistency"] --> P3Out
P3Out["Artifacts:<br>presentation/validation/component-deck-validation-{name}.md"] --> P4
P4["Phase 4: Packaging<br>1 agent — produce crosswalk index, apply corrections,<br>finalize all deck outlines"] --> P4Out
P4Out["Artifacts:<br>presentation/presentation-crosswalk.md<br>presentation/decks/ (finalized)"] --> Done(["Complete"])Inputs
Read these artifacts from the walkthrough directory (all paths below are relative to that directory):
| Artifact | Path | Required |
| Unified walkthrough | unified-walkthrough.md or unified/index.md | Yes |
| Walkthrough sections | sections/walkthrough-section-*.md | Yes |
| Validation reports | validation/validation-report-*.md | Yes |
| Coverage plan | coverage-plan.md | Yes |
| Entry points | entry-points.md | Yes |
| Open questions | open-questions.md | Yes |
Input Validation
Before starting Phase 1, verify all required walkthrough artifacts exist. Check for unified-walkthrough.md (or unified/index.md), at least one file matching sections/walkthrough-section-*.md, coverage-plan.md, entry-points.md, and open-questions.md. If any required artifact is missing, stop and report which files are absent.
Phase 1: Component Extraction and Deck Planning
Spawn one general-purpose agent to read walkthrough outputs and produce a component index and per-component deck plans.
Agent prompt context
Include these in the agent prompt (pass file paths — do not transcribe file contents):
- Walkthrough directory path
- File path: agent-instructions.md — agent reads section "Planning Agent Instructions"
- File path: output-format.md — agent reads sections "Component Index Format" and "Deck Plan Format"
Agent deliverables
| Artifact | Path |
| Component index | presentation/component-index.md |
| Deck plans | presentation/deck-plans/component-deck-plan-{name}.md (one per component) |
Orchestrator actions after Phase 1
- Read
presentation/component-index.mdto get the component list and deck-to-component mapping. - Proceed to Phase 2 with one agent per component. Each agent reads its own deck plan.
Phase 2: Deck Generation
Spawn N parallel general-purpose agents — one per component from the deck plan. Each agent constructs the presentation narrative and generates the full deck outline in a single pass, eliminating the intermediate narrative artifact.
Agent prompt context (per agent)
Include these in the agent prompt (pass file paths — do not transcribe file contents):
- Component deck plan file path
- Walkthrough directory path (for reading source sections and evidence references)
- File path: agent-instructions.md — agent reads section "Deck Generation Agent Instructions"
- File path: output-format.md — agent reads sections "Deck Outline Format" and "Slide Format"
Agent deliverables (per agent)
| Artifact | Path |
| Deck outline | presentation/decks/component-deck-outline-{name}.md |
Orchestrator actions after Phase 2
- Verify all expected deck outline files exist.
- Proceed to Phase 3.
Phase 3: Validation
Spawn M parallel general-purpose agents. Each validator checks one or more deck outlines against the source walkthrough.
Validator cross-assignment: rotate deck assignments so validator 1 checks decks from generation agent 2, validator 2 checks decks from generation agent 3, and so on (wrapping around). If there are fewer validators than generation agents, each validator checks multiple decks. If there is only one deck, the single validator checks it (self-validation is acceptable when no alternative exists).
Agent prompt context (per validator)
Include these in the agent prompt (pass file paths — do not transcribe file contents):
- Assigned deck outline file paths
- Walkthrough directory path
- Other deck outline file paths (for cross-deck consistency checks)
- File path: agent-instructions.md — agent reads section "Deck Validation Agent Instructions"
- File path: output-format.md — agent reads section "Deck Validation Report Format"
Agent deliverables (per validator)
| Artifact | Path |
| Validation report | presentation/validation/component-deck-validation-{name}.md |
Orchestrator actions after Phase 3
- Read all validation reports.
- If critical corrections exist (unsupported claims, invented architecture, incorrect sequencing), spawn a new
general-purposeagent per affected deck to apply the corrections. Pass the agent the validation report and deck outline file path. The agent edits the deck file in place. - Proceed to Phase 4.
Phase 4: Packaging
Spawn one general-purpose agent to finalize all deck outlines and produce the crosswalk index.
Agent prompt context
Include these in the agent prompt (pass file paths — do not transcribe file contents):
- Directory path:
presentation/decks/— agent reads all deck outline files - Directory path:
presentation/validation/— agent reads all validation reports - File path:
presentation/component-index.md - File path: agent-instructions.md — agent reads section "Packaging Agent Instructions"
- File path: output-format.md — agent reads section "Presentation Crosswalk Format"
Agent deliverables
| Artifact | Path |
| Presentation crosswalk | presentation/presentation-crosswalk.md |
| Finalized deck outlines | presentation/decks/ (corrections applied) |
Large output handling
If the crosswalk or any deck outline exceeds 25k characters, apply the large file write strategy using Strategy A (multi-file split).
Deck Planning Heuristics
- One deck per major component by default.
- Merge when two components are too small or too tightly coupled to explain separately.
- Split when one component is too broad to explain coherently in one deck.
- A component may be an app, service, package, library, worker, pipeline, platform layer, or other meaningful architectural unit.
Default Audience
Technical audience: engineers, tech leads, platform owners, SRE/DevOps engineers, and engineering managers.
Presentation Style
- Optimize for technical clarity, not executive fluff.
- Use concise, high-signal slide text — avoid dense paragraphs.
- Put detailed explanation in speaker notes.
- Make each deck readable standalone but consistent with other decks.
- Use consistent naming, terms, and structural patterns across all decks.
Evidence Handling
- Every substantive slide references the walkthrough sections, validation reports, or source artifacts that support it.
- Distinguish verified facts from inferred connections.
- Preserve unresolved uncertainty from the walkthrough — do not smooth it away.
Resources
- Agent instructions — detailed prompts for each agent type (planning, deck generation, validation, packaging)
- Output format — required structure and templates for all artifacts
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

