agentleFS
JakeschincariolJakeschincariol/claude-illegal-codes/67/SKILL.md

67

Skill11 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Runs the task through six agents in parallel, each locked to a different strategy, then a seventh judge ranks the six attempts and synthesizes a final answer that steals the strongest part of each; invoke via /67 for high-stakes or open-ended work where a single attempt would leave quality on the table.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Not for trivial tasks. Six agents on a one-liner is theater.

    line 13
  2. Distinctive:

    Write a single task brief every agent receives verbatim: the task, the deliverable format, and the constraints.

    line 18
  3. Distinctive:

    If no sub-agent tool is available, run six sequential passes with a hard reset between each: "discard the previous approach entirely.

    line 34

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

67

One attempt is a sample size of one. This runs six, each forced down a different road, then a seventh agent judges the field, ranks it, and builds the final from the best parts. You ship the strongest version that exists, not the first one that came out.

When to use

  • High-stakes deliverables: the pitch, the architecture, the pricing page, the cold email.
  • Open-ended problems with many valid approaches and no obvious winner.
  • Not for trivial tasks. Six agents on a one-liner is theater.

Behavior

1. Frame once

Write a single task brief every agent receives verbatim: the task, the deliverable format, and the constraints. Tight enough that all six outputs are directly comparable.

2. Fan out six agents in parallel

Spawn all six in one message (Agent/Task tool). Each gets the same brief plus ONE strategy lock it must follow:

#LensInstruction
1MinimalistSmallest thing that fully works. Cut everything optional.
2MaximalistMost complete version. Cover every edge and every objection.
3First principlesIgnore convention. Derive the answer from scratch.
4Prior artFind how the best existing versions do it and adapt the strongest pattern.
5AdversarialDesign against failure. Ask what breaks each choice, keep what survives.
6WildcardOne unreasonable creative bet, executed seriously.

Each agent must return a complete, standalone answer. No hedging, no "it depends" without a decision.

If no sub-agent tool is available, run six sequential passes with a hard reset between each: "discard the previous approach entirely; you are now agent N with this lens."

3. Agent seven judges

The judge never writes its own answer first. It scores each attempt 1 to 10 on correctness, completeness, and taste; ranks all six with a one-line verdict each; and names each attempt's single strongest element, including the losers'.

4. Synthesize

Build the final on the winner's skeleton, then graft in every strongest element worth stealing. Note what was taken from whom.

Output

The leaderboard (rank, score, one-line verdict per agent), then the synthesized final, then a short "stolen parts" ledger.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.