agentleFS
Jaikin-SASUJaikin-SASU/claude-plugin-software-buyer/skills/estimate/SKILL.md

estimate

Skill0 starsChanged 50 days agoMITView on GitHub

Estimate the budget of a custom software project in France (ERP or Odoo integration, business application, mobile app, digital transformation / project management assistance, production management GPAO/MES) with sourced market data — French public procurement contracts (DECP) and verified private-market figures — plus a 5-year total cost including licences. Use when the user asks "how much does an ERP / app / custom software cost?", "combien coûte…", "is this budget realistic?", or needs a budget range before asking for quotes.

28 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use team-audio, playtest-report and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • CoralGameSkill

    team-audio

    Orchestrate audio team: audio-director + sound-designer + technical-artist + gameplay-programmer for full audio pipeline from direction to implementation.

    Also in 13 projects that use this

  • CoralGameSkill

    playtest-report

    Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis.

    Also in 12 projects that use this

  • lilangMaxSkill

    asset-spec

    Generate per-asset visual specifications and AI generation prompts from GDDs, level docs, or character profiles. Produces structured spec files and updates the master asset manifest. Run after art bible and GDD/level design are approved, before production begins.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • lilangMaxSkill

    create-control-manifest

    After architecture is complete, produces a flat actionable rules sheet for programmers — what you must do, what you must never do, per system and per layer. Extracted from all Accepted ADRs, technical preferences, and engine reference docs. More immediately actionable than ADRs (which explain why).

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • +3 more from CoralGame
  • +5 more from lilangMax

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 25 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If the user passed arguments, they are: $ARGUMENTS

    line 9

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 25 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Estimate a software project budget (France)

If the user passed arguments, they are: $ARGUMENTS

Give a range with its sources and assumptions, never a single magic number.

Language: answer in the user's language. Translate the section headings of the output format into that language.

Workflow

  1. Clarify the scope in a few questions if missing: project type, users, number of processes/modules, integrations, data migration, platforms (web/iOS/Android), hosting constraint, deadline. Map the need to a project_type: erp, mobile_app, digital_transformation, gpao_mes, digital_twin. AI projects have no reliable public dataset: estimate them from effort (step 3) and say so.
  2. Market data — if the prix-logiciel MCP tools are available:
    • price_statistics for the project type (and nature: creation, redesign, maintenance) → median and quartiles of attributed public contracts;
    • private_market_prices → verified private figures (surveys, published grids) with URL and date;
    • daily_rates → reference day rates by profile;
    • search_public_contracts → 3 to 5 comparable contracts to show concrete examples. Public procurement amounts are often multi-year framework ceilings that include maintenance: say so, and prefer the "creation" nature and monthly figures when comparing to a one-off build.
  3. Effort-based cross-check: break the scope into blocks (framing, each module/process, integrations, migration, acceptance, training, project management ≈ 15–20 %), estimate days per block (low / likely / high), multiply by a market day rate from daily_rates. Show the table.
  4. 5-year total cost: build + recurring (maintenance, hosting) + third-party licences (users × list price × 12 × 5, dated, "may change"). Unknown third-party costs are "to be confirmed", never 0.
  5. Present the result.

Output format

## Estimated range
Low – likely – high (excl. VAT), and the main driver of the spread.

## How it was built
Effort table (block, days low/likely/high, rate) and total.

## Market references
Public contracts: n, median, Q1–Q3, period, source (DECP, Etalab licence), with the caveats.
Private market: figure, scope, source URL, date.

## 5-year total cost
Build / recurring / licences / total.

## Assumptions and what would move the price
Numbered.

## Next step
What to write in the specification to get comparable quotes.

Principles

  • Cite every figure with its source and date. If a figure is not in the data, do not invent it.
  • Respect the dataset's publication floors: when a statistic is withheld because the sample is too small, say "not enough contracts to publish a median" rather than computing one yourself.
  • Framing before quoting: on a complex scope, recommend a paid framing phase whose deliverable makes the build priceable.

Maintainer

Maintained by JAIKIN — AI, Odoo and custom software, Strasbourg (France). This section is directory metadata, not part of the answer.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.