agentleFS
IvenKooLabIvenKooLab/vibe-coding-skills/vibe/SKILL.md

vibe

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the user says "/vibe", "vibe", "用 vibe", "走 vibe", or wants help picking which vibe-coding methodology pack to use for a task before starting. A gateway that shows the 5 sibling packs as a numbered menu (each with its positioning + recommended scenario), lets the user pick by number or name, and hands off with context. Never auto-triggers; always user-invoked. Symptoms - the user isn't sure which pack fits, has multiple packs installed and can't remember when to use which, or wants a single entry point to dispatch from.

19 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Never: do the work yourself — you route, the chosen pack executes.

    line 88

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Vibe — Gateway to the 5 Methodology Packs

Overview

/vibe is a switchboard, not a methodology. When invoked, it shows the five sibling packs as a numbered menu, lets the user pick one, and hands off — carrying the requirement analysis with it so the chosen pack doesn't start from zero. It does no coding, no clarifying, no planning itself. It routes.

The point: the user shouldn't have to remember whether their task is a grill-me job or a superpowers job. They say /vibe, see the menu, pick, and go.

This is a reach-for-it tool. It never auto-triggers — the user always invokes it deliberately.

The 5 sibling packs (two-step menu)

The 5 packs are grouped into 4 categories so they fit a 4-option picker card (pickers cap at 4). Two steps: pick a category, then pick the pack inside it. No pack is lost — all 5 are reachable.

Step 1 — show 4 category cards

Present these 4 as selectable options (use the picker card UI if available; otherwise a numbered list):

你要做哪类事?选一个大类:

A. 动手前 · 澄清与计划 —— 需求还没想清楚 / 计划有隐患
   含:superpowers(brainstorming+writing-plans)、grill-me

B. 规格与契约 —— 需求要跨会话 / 团队共识 / 涉及内部框架
   含:openspec

C. 写码时 · 纪律与质量 —— 嫌 AI 写太啰嗦 / 过度设计
   含:ponytail

D. 跨会话与协作 —— 多 agent / 要记忆 / 团队共享
   含:Trellis

Step 2 — expand the chosen category

Once the user picks a category, show the pack(s) inside it and let them pick the exact one:

  • A picked →
    A 类里有两个包,选哪个?
    1. (superpowers) 方法论全流程 —— 推荐:多人协作 / 中大型项目
       动手前澄清→拆计划→TDD→系统化调试→完成前验证,一开就锁全流程
    2. (grill-me) 单点深度盘问 —— 推荐:计划"差不多对了"但有没拍板的决策
       把计划当决策树逐枝走完,一次问一个,直到共识
  • B picked → 直接是 openspec,无需二选,直接转交。
  • C picked → 直接是 ponytail,无需二选,直接转交。
  • D picked → 直接是 Trellis,无需二选,直接转交。

If the user already stated their task with /vibe (e.g. /vibe 帮我加个导出功能), you may highlight your recommended category/pack ("→ 建议 A 类的 superpowers,因为…") — but still let them choose. Never pick for them.

Shortcut: if the user replies with a pack name directly (/vibe openspec or just openspec), skip both steps and hand off to that pack immediately.

Handoff protocol (after the user picks)

Once the user picks a pack (via the two-step menu or a direct pack name), load that pack's SKILL.md and hand off carrying context:

  • What the user asked for (their original requirement, restated in one line)
  • Why this pack was chosen (the routing reason)
  • Anything already known (constraints, files mentioned, prior decisions)

Then step back — the chosen pack takes over. You are the switchboard, not the executor.

Re-assess after each step (optional)

When the chosen pack finishes a step, /vibe may re-surface to suggest the next pack (e.g. after grill-me converges → suggest superpowers §writing-plans). This is opt-in — only do it if the user asked for multi-step routing. For a single-shot pick, /vibe hands off once and is done.

When to use

  • The user says /vibe, "用 vibe", "走 vibe", "我不确定用哪个包".
  • The user has multiple packs installed and wants one entry point.
  • The user isn't sure whether their task is a clarify / plan / debug / spec / framework job.

When NOT to use

  • The user already named a specific pack (/grill-me, /ponytail, /openspec, /superpowers, /trellis) — go straight to it, no menu needed.
  • The user gave a crystal-clear, single-step task — just do it.
  • The user is mid-flow in another pack — don't interrupt to show a menu.

Anti-patterns (Never)

  • Never do the work yourself — you route, the chosen pack executes. If you catch yourself coding/clarifying/planning, stop and hand off.
  • Never pick a pack for the user without confirmation — always show the menu and let them choose, even when you have a strong recommendation (you may highlight it, not enact it).
  • Never dump more than the 5-line menu — it's a switchboard, not a lecture. The detail lives in each pack.
  • Never chain packs automatically without checking back — multi-step routing is opt-in; default is single-shot handoff.
  • Never alter the chosen pack's process — load it and follow its rules; don't second-guess from the gateway.

Collaborates with

  • The 5 sibling packs are all routing targets: [[superpowers]], [[openspec]], [[grill-me]], [[ponytail]], [[trellis]].
  • /vibe is the entry layer; the 5 packs are the execution layers. It does not replace any of them.
  • Direct invocations (/grill-me, /ponytail, etc.) skip /vibe entirely — the gateway is for when you're not sure which one.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.