vibe
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user says "/vibe", "vibe", "用 vibe", "走 vibe", or wants help picking which vibe-coding methodology pack to use for a task before starting. A gateway that shows the 5 sibling packs as a numbered menu (each with its positioning + recommended scenario), lets the user pick by number or name, and hands off with context. Never auto-triggers; always user-invoked. Symptoms - the user isn't sure which pack fits, has multiple packs installed and can't remember when to use which, or wants a single entry point to dispatch from.
19 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- timurgaleev/vibestacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- kexi/vibe-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- pmatos/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- ubmids/vibetheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- mistralai/mistral-vibetheir own version, first seen Oct 19, 2026
Other versions19 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 19
- mistralai/mistral-vibe★ 5.3ksame name
- foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills★ 3.8ksame name
- pcx-wave/vibe-skill★ 118same name
- geeks-accelerator/in-bed-ai★ 26same name
- kennethleungty/claude-music★ 23same name
- rizukirr/vibekit★ 20same name
- th3vib3coder/vibe-science★ 16same name
- timurgaleev/vibestack★ 8same name
- JustineDevs/meta-architect★ 5same name
- Ally-for-Hire/Github-Vibe-Skill★ 2same name
9 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 88
Never: do the work yourself — you route, the chosen pack executes.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Vibe — Gateway to the 5 Methodology Packs
Overview
/vibe is a switchboard, not a methodology. When invoked, it shows the five sibling packs as a numbered menu, lets the user pick one, and hands off — carrying the requirement analysis with it so the chosen pack doesn't start from zero. It does no coding, no clarifying, no planning itself. It routes.
The point: the user shouldn't have to remember whether their task is a grill-me job or a superpowers job. They say /vibe, see the menu, pick, and go.
This is a reach-for-it tool. It never auto-triggers — the user always invokes it deliberately.
The 5 sibling packs (two-step menu)
The 5 packs are grouped into 4 categories so they fit a 4-option picker card (pickers cap at 4). Two steps: pick a category, then pick the pack inside it. No pack is lost — all 5 are reachable.
Step 1 — show 4 category cards
Present these 4 as selectable options (use the picker card UI if available; otherwise a numbered list):
你要做哪类事?选一个大类:
A. 动手前 · 澄清与计划 —— 需求还没想清楚 / 计划有隐患
含:superpowers(brainstorming+writing-plans)、grill-me
B. 规格与契约 —— 需求要跨会话 / 团队共识 / 涉及内部框架
含:openspec
C. 写码时 · 纪律与质量 —— 嫌 AI 写太啰嗦 / 过度设计
含:ponytail
D. 跨会话与协作 —— 多 agent / 要记忆 / 团队共享
含:TrellisStep 2 — expand the chosen category
Once the user picks a category, show the pack(s) inside it and let them pick the exact one:
- A picked →
A 类里有两个包,选哪个? 1. (superpowers) 方法论全流程 —— 推荐:多人协作 / 中大型项目 动手前澄清→拆计划→TDD→系统化调试→完成前验证,一开就锁全流程 2. (grill-me) 单点深度盘问 —— 推荐:计划"差不多对了"但有没拍板的决策 把计划当决策树逐枝走完,一次问一个,直到共识 - B picked → 直接是
openspec,无需二选,直接转交。 - C picked → 直接是
ponytail,无需二选,直接转交。 - D picked → 直接是
Trellis,无需二选,直接转交。
If the user already stated their task with
/vibe(e.g./vibe 帮我加个导出功能), you may highlight your recommended category/pack ("→ 建议 A 类的 superpowers,因为…") — but still let them choose. Never pick for them.Shortcut: if the user replies with a pack name directly (
/vibe openspecor justopenspec), skip both steps and hand off to that pack immediately.
Handoff protocol (after the user picks)
Once the user picks a pack (via the two-step menu or a direct pack name), load that pack's SKILL.md and hand off carrying context:
- What the user asked for (their original requirement, restated in one line)
- Why this pack was chosen (the routing reason)
- Anything already known (constraints, files mentioned, prior decisions)
Then step back — the chosen pack takes over. You are the switchboard, not the executor.
Re-assess after each step (optional)
When the chosen pack finishes a step, /vibe may re-surface to suggest the next pack (e.g. after grill-me converges → suggest superpowers §writing-plans). This is opt-in — only do it if the user asked for multi-step routing. For a single-shot pick, /vibe hands off once and is done.
When to use
- The user says
/vibe, "用 vibe", "走 vibe", "我不确定用哪个包". - The user has multiple packs installed and wants one entry point.
- The user isn't sure whether their task is a clarify / plan / debug / spec / framework job.
When NOT to use
- The user already named a specific pack (
/grill-me,/ponytail,/openspec,/superpowers,/trellis) — go straight to it, no menu needed. - The user gave a crystal-clear, single-step task — just do it.
- The user is mid-flow in another pack — don't interrupt to show a menu.
Anti-patterns (Never)
- Never do the work yourself — you route, the chosen pack executes. If you catch yourself coding/clarifying/planning, stop and hand off.
- Never pick a pack for the user without confirmation — always show the menu and let them choose, even when you have a strong recommendation (you may highlight it, not enact it).
- Never dump more than the 5-line menu — it's a switchboard, not a lecture. The detail lives in each pack.
- Never chain packs automatically without checking back — multi-step routing is opt-in; default is single-shot handoff.
- Never alter the chosen pack's process — load it and follow its rules; don't second-guess from the gateway.
Collaborates with
- The 5 sibling packs are all routing targets: [[superpowers]], [[openspec]], [[grill-me]], [[ponytail]], [[trellis]].
/vibeis the entry layer; the 5 packs are the execution layers. It does not replace any of them.- Direct invocations (
/grill-me,/ponytail, etc.) skip/vibeentirely — the gateway is for when you're not sure which one.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

