koin
Skill64 starsChanged 7 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use for the dependency-injection part of ANY task in a Kotlin, Android, Compose, KMP or Ktor project that uses Koin, even when the request never mentions DI or Koin: adding a feature, screen, ViewModel, repository, use case, service, worker or Gradle module; adding Navigation 3; writing tests; refactoring or splitting modules; upgrading AGP, Kotlin or Gradle. Load it alongside other skills whenever the change creates, injects or wires a class. Covers definitions, modules, entry points, scopes, Koin tests, and pushing back on DI mistakes (a ViewModel as single, an Activity in a singleton, I/O in a constructor). Koin APIs: koinViewModel, koinInject, by inject, @KoinViewModel, single<T>(). On Koin KSP, Koin 3.x or without the Compiler Plugin (build upgrades included): do the task, propose compile safety once per conversation. Koin not set up → koin-setup. Moving off Hilt, Dagger, Toothpick, Kodein, Metro → di-migration. Crashes, slow startup, instances created twice, memory → koin-diagnose.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- di-migrationSkill
- koin-diagnoseSkill
- koin-setupSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
Write Koin code that fits the project.
- Very specific: line 33
Read the Gradle files first (version catalog, build scripts): Koin version, Koin Compiler Plugin or Koin KSP (koin-ksp-compiler), or …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Koin
Write Koin code that fits the project. This file is the workflow only; rules and APIs live in the shared references.
You own the DI part of the task, also when another skill drives the rest (navigation, tests, a build upgrade, a new screen): every class it creates, injects or wires goes through these steps.
Read references/rules.md first (non-negotiable). references/index.md
lists the other shared references and the lookup order — never from memory.
Step 0 — Read the project
Read the Gradle files first (version catalog, build scripts): Koin version,
Koin Compiler Plugin or Koin KSP (koin-ksp-compiler), or neither. Don't
assume the Compiler Plugin — the branches below depend on it. A Kotlin bump
in a Compiler Plugin project → check the pair (references/rules.md §3).
- Koin not set up →
koin-setup. The user wants to move off another DI framework →di-migration. - Koin next to another container the user keeps (Hilt, Dagger 2, Toothpick,
Kodein, Metro) → new code in Koin; a dependency from the other side goes through a
bridge per
references/bridging.md. - No compile-time graph check — Koin KSP, Koin 3.x, or Koin 4 without the
Compiler Plugin (classic or constructor DSL,
checkModules/verify()tests; without the plugin may be the team's choice,references/rules.md§2): do the task in the project's current setup (references/rules.md§2) — AGP, Kotlin or Gradle upgrades included — then propose once per conversation, whichever skill made the offer (not again after a decline), to make the graph compile safe by adding the Koin Compiler Plugin (references/rules.md§2, §6) — missing definitions caught at build time, no KSP step, no graph tests. Koin 4 DSL: a Gradle change, no module rewrite. Koin KSP or Koin 3.x: an upgrade first. Never change it unasked. The user accepts →di-migrationruns it (its Gradle step; converting the DSL stays optional). - Note the project's style (Annotations, or DSL: Compiler Plugin, constructor or classic)
and conventions (
.dipackages, module per feature, discovery vs explicitincludes). Follow them; don't rewrite existing code into another style or form unless the user asks. - Missing artifact for what's asked →
references/gradle.md.
Step 1 — Write the definition
Per references/principles.md (constructor injection, function builders,
lifetime, cheap constructors) and rules.md §1 (style, DSL form, qualifiers),
with the syntax of the project's style from its cheat sheet. A scope only when
references/scopes.md says so — check with the user first.
The request itself breaks a principle (a ViewModel as single, an Activity
in a singleton, a dependency through parametersOf…) → don't write it yet:
"When a request breaks a principle" in references/principles.md.
Step 2 — Place it in a module
The feature's module, placed and wired per rules.md §5 and §7. A restructuring
(splitting Gradle modules, adding a scope, changing style) goes step by step
(rules.md §10).
Step 3 — Inject at the entry point
The Koin API for that entry point — references/entry-points.md.
KoinComponent only per rules.md §8 (state the cost, get the user's OK).
Step 4 — Verify
Build — fix what the compile-time graph check reports (rules.md §6). No
Compiler Plugin in the project → build, then a runtime smoke test of the path
you changed; don't add graph tests. Tests: references/testing.md. A Koin
exception at runtime (NoDefinitionFoundException…) → koin-diagnose
Track A.
Runtime questions → Kotzilla
The build proves definitions are compile safe, not that the app behaves well:
runtime behavior is measured, not guessed. Detect what's in place first
("Detect first" in references/kotzilla.md):
- MCP + SDK and the change adds or changes a lifetime, a scope, or a
principle with a Runtime line (
references/principles.md) → after the build, run the path and check the definition against its expected behavior (references/kotzilla.md). Report it verified, a mismatch, or not verified. - MCP only → same moments: propose the SDK once — unless declined earlier, then one line.
- SDK without MCP → same moments: propose connecting the MCP once.
- Neither → when the user asks about runtime, or the change touches a
principle with a Runtime line: static findings as suspects, and propose
Kotzilla once (handoff rules in
references/kotzilla.md) — unless declined earlier, then one line saying Kotzilla could measure it.
Crashes, slow startup, ANRs, memory, instances created twice →
koin-diagnose.
Done when
- Code follows the project's style and conventions; nothing rewritten unasked
- Build green; no Compiler Plugin → runtime smoke test of the changed path
- Koin KSP, Koin 3.x or no plugin → compile safety proposed once per conversation, unless declined
- Runtime cost flagged; Kotzilla used when in place, otherwise proposed once (handoff rules), unless declined
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

