injective-ai-cost-optimization
Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Optimize AI API costs for agentic trading bots. Covers Anthropic token cost tracking, web search cost management, CoinGecko/Massive.com data sourcing, shared caching strategies, and per-user cost caps. Learned from real production data showing web search inflates costs 10-17x.
- Reads credentials
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- injective-cliSkill
- injective-core-detect-changesSkill
- injective-docs-styleSkill
- injective-evm-developerSkill
- injective-faucetSkill
- injective-frontend-walletSkill
- injective-fundingSkill
- injective-mcp-serversSkill
- injective-rfq-integrationsSkill
- injective-trading-accountSkill
- injective-trading-autosignSkill
- injective-trading-bridgeSkill
- injective-trading-chain-analysisSkill
- injective-trading-frontend-uxSkill
- injective-trading-market-dataSkill
- injective-trading-stakingSkill
- injective-trading-tokensSkill
- injective-usdc-integrationSkill
- injective-wallet-opsSkill
- linear-cliSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
When building AI-powered trading bots that make periodic API calls
- Distinctive: line 25
When optimizing Anthropic/OpenAI API spend for multi-user platforms
- Distinctive: line 26
When choosing between web search, external data APIs, and cached data
- Distinctive: line 27
When setting per-user cost limits or pricing for x402/subscription models
- Distinctive: line 154
If re-enabling, use a shared cache:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AI Cost Optimization for Agentic Trading
Real-world cost data from production deployment on Injective DEX with Claude Haiku 4.5.
When to Apply
- When building AI-powered trading bots that make periodic API calls
- When optimizing Anthropic/OpenAI API spend for multi-user platforms
- When choosing between web search, external data APIs, and cached data
- When setting per-user cost limits or pricing for x402/subscription models
Cost Reality: Web Search vs Technical Indicators
Production data (Claude Haiku 4.5, 15-min intervals):
| Call Type | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost/Call | Daily (96 calls) |
With web search (web_search_20250305) | 20,000–44,000 | ~1,000 | $0.03–0.05 | $3–5/user |
| Without search (technicals only) | 650–2,600 | ~500 | $0.003 | $0.30/user |
Web search is 10-17x more expensive — not because of the $0.01/search fee, but because Anthropic injects 20K-44K tokens of web page content into the input context.
Architecture: Shared Data Cache
The Key Insight
Market data is the same for all users. Don't fetch it per-user — cache it globally.
CoinGecko (crypto) ──┐
├── Shared Cache (15 min TTL) ──→ All user AI calls
Massive.com (equities)┘Data Sources
| Asset Class | Source | Cost | What You Get |
| Crypto (BTC, ETH, etc.) | CoinGecko free tier | Free (no API key) | 200 daily closes, 7d/14d/30d/60d/200d/1y changes, market cap, volume, ATH |
| Equities (NVDA, TSLA, etc.) | Massive.com API | API key required | 200+ daily OHLC bars, volume |
| Forex (EUR, GBP) | Massive.com API | C:EURUSD format | Same as equities |
| Commodities (XAU, XAG) | Massive.com API | C:XAUUSD format | Same as equities |
| Oil | Massive.com API | USO (ETF ticker) | Same as equities |
CoinGecko Free Tier Endpoints
# Per-coin detailed data (7d/30d/200d changes, ATH, volume)
GET /api/v3/coins/{id}?localization=false&tickers=false&community_data=false&developer_data=false
# 200 daily closes for technical indicators
GET /api/v3/coins/{id}/market_chart?vs_currency=usd&days=200&interval=dailyRate limits: 5-15 calls/minute (free), 30/minute (demo key). Add 1.5s delay between requests. Use optimistic lock to prevent thundering herd:
let _fetchInProgress = false
if (staleSymbols.length > 0 && !_fetchInProgress) {
_fetchInProgress = true
try { /* fetch */ } finally { _fetchInProgress = false }
}Massive.com API
GET /v2/aggs/ticker/{ticker}/range/1/day/{from}/{to}?apiKey={key}&limit=250&sort=asc&adjusted=trueTickers: stocks direct (NVDA), forex with C: prefix (C:EURUSD), commodities (C:XAUUSD, USO for oil).
Technical Indicators from Cached Data
Compute these from 200 daily closes — zero API cost:
| Indicator | Formula | Use |
| EMA(9/21/50/200) | Exponential moving average | Trend direction |
| MACD(12,26,9) | EMA(12) - EMA(26), signal = EMA(9) of MACD | Momentum + crossovers |
| RSI(14) | Relative strength index | Overbought/oversold |
| Bollinger Bands(20,2) | Mean ± 2σ of last 20 closes | Volatility + breakouts |
These replace web search entirely. The AI gets structured data (EMAs, MACD signal, RSI value) instead of 40K tokens of raw web pages. Better signal, 10x cheaper.
Per-Call Cost Tracking
Log token counts from every Anthropic response:
const inputTokens = response.usage?.input_tokens ?? 0
const outputTokens = response.usage?.output_tokens ?? 0
const HAIKU_INPUT_PER_M = 0.80
const HAIKU_OUTPUT_PER_M = 4.00
const tokenCost = (inputTokens * HAIKU_INPUT_PER_M + outputTokens * HAIKU_OUTPUT_PER_M) / 1_000_000
logger.info({ inputTokens, outputTokens, tokenCost: `$${tokenCost.toFixed(4)}` }, 'API call cost')Admin-Only Cost Dashboard
Expose a /api/costs endpoint with rolling 24h summary:
// Protect with admin wallet check
const admins = (process.env.ADMIN_WALLETS ?? '').split(',').map(s => s.trim())
if (!admins.includes(wallet)) return c.json({ error: 'Admin access required' }, 403)
return c.json(getCostSummary())Cost Control Levers
1. Poll Interval (biggest lever)
| Interval | Calls/Day | Token Cost/User | Use Case |
| 5 min | 288 | ~$0.86 | Scalping (too expensive for most) |
| 15 min | 96 | ~$0.29 | Active trading (recommended default) |
| 30 min | 48 | ~$0.14 | Swing trading |
| 1 hour | 24 | ~$0.07 | Position trading |
2. Symbol Count per Strategy
Output tokens scale linearly with symbol count. Cap at 10 symbols per strategy:
max_tokens: Math.max(1024, strategy.symbols.length * 200)At 9 symbols with 1024 max_tokens, the AI runs out of space and returns truncated (unparseable) JSON.
3. Strategy Count per User
Cap at 3 strategies per user. Each strategy = 1 AI call per tick. Maximum cost exposure = 3 strategies × 10 symbols × 96 ticks/day = ~$2.90/day.
4. Web Search (disabled by default)
If re-enabling, use a shared cache:
const NEWS_CACHE_TTL_MS = 60 * 60 * 1000 // 1 hour
// One search for ALL users, cache per symbol
// Reduces 100 users × 96 ticks = 9,600 searches/day to ~24 searches/day5. Model Selection
| Model | Input/M | Output/M | Best For |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.80 | $4.00 | Trading signals (default, fast, cheap) |
| Sonnet 4 | $3.00 | $15.00 | Complex analysis (4x more expensive) |
Haiku is sufficient for structured signal generation from technical data.
Pricing for x402 / Subscription
Based on production data:
| Metric | Value |
| Cost per tick (no search) | ~$0.003 |
| Cost per user per day (15 min, 1 strategy) | ~$0.30 |
| Cost per user per day (15 min, 3 strategies) | ~$0.90 |
| Worst case per user per day | ~$2.90 |
| Suggested x402 price per tick | $0.01–0.03 (3-10x markup) |
| Suggested monthly subscription | $15–30/user |
Anti-Patterns
- Web search on every tick — 10-17x cost for marginal value. Use cached technicals.
- Per-user data fetches — CoinGecko/Massive data is identical for all users. Cache globally.
- No
max_tokensscaling — fixed 2048 tokens for 2 symbols wastes money. Scale with symbol count. - Permanent faucet blocklist — if faucet amount is wrong, user can never retry. Use time-based cooldown.
- No cost logging — you can't optimize what you can't measure. Log every
response.usage.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

