agentleFS
InfopibeInfopibe/everything-claude-code/AGENTS.md

everything-claude-code

AGENTS.md8 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

This is a production-ready AI coding plugin providing 16 specialized agents, 65+ skills, 40 commands, and automated hook workflows for software development. Use agents proactively without user prompt: - Complex feature requests → planner - Code just written/modified → code-reviewer - Bug fix or new feature → tdd-guide - Architectural decision → architect - Security-sensitive code → security-reviewer - Multi-channel communication triage → chief-of-staff - Autonomous loops / loop monitoring → loop-operator - Harness config reliability and cost → harness-optimizer

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

17 rules. About 3 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈3

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈14

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use agents proactively without user prompt:

    line 36
  2. Distinctive:

    Use parallel execution for independent operations — launch multiple agents simultaneously.

    line 46
  3. Common:

    No hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens)

    line 51
  4. Distinctive:

    All user inputs validated

    line 52
  5. Common:

    Secret management: NEVER hardcode secrets. Use environment variables or a secret manager.

    line 60
  6. Common:

    If security issue found: STOP → use security-reviewer agent → fix CRITICAL issues → rotate exposed secrets → review codebase for similar …

    line 62
  7. Distinctive:

    Immutability (CRITICAL): Always create new objects, never mutate.

    line 66
  8. Distinctive:

    No deep nesting (>4 levels)

    line 76
  9. Distinctive:

    Test types (all required):

    line 84
  10. Distinctive:

    Write test first (RED) — test should FAIL

    line 90
  11. Distinctive:

    Write minimal implementation (GREEN) — test should PASS

    line 91
  12. Distinctive:

    If the current task already produces the relevant docs or code comments, do not duplicate the same information elsewhere

    line 104
  13. Distinctive:

    If there is no obvious project doc location, ask before creating a new top-level file

    line 105
  14. Distinctive:

    Skeleton projects: Search for battle-tested templates, evaluate with parallel agents (security, extensibility, relevance), clone best …

    line 120
  15. Distinctive:

    Context management: Avoid last 20% of context window for large refactoring and multi-file features.

    line 124
  16. Distinctive:

    Build troubleshooting: Use build-error-resolver agent → analyze errors → fix incrementally → verify after each fix.

    line 126
  17. Distinctive:

    All tests pass with 80%+ coverage

    line 143

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 36,368 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

Everything Claude Code (ECC) — Agent Instructions

This is a production-ready AI coding plugin providing 16 specialized agents, 65+ skills, 40 commands, and automated hook workflows for software development.

Core Principles

  1. Agent-First — Delegate to specialized agents for domain tasks
  2. Test-Driven — Write tests before implementation, 80%+ coverage required
  3. Security-First — Never compromise on security; validate all inputs
  4. Immutability — Always create new objects, never mutate existing ones
  5. Plan Before Execute — Plan complex features before writing code

Available Agents

AgentPurposeWhen to Use
plannerImplementation planningComplex features, refactoring
architectSystem design and scalabilityArchitectural decisions
tdd-guideTest-driven developmentNew features, bug fixes
code-reviewerCode quality and maintainabilityAfter writing/modifying code
security-reviewerVulnerability detectionBefore commits, sensitive code
build-error-resolverFix build/type errorsWhen build fails
e2e-runnerEnd-to-end Playwright testingCritical user flows
refactor-cleanerDead code cleanupCode maintenance
doc-updaterDocumentation and codemapsUpdating docs
go-reviewerGo code reviewGo projects
go-build-resolverGo build errorsGo build failures
database-reviewerPostgreSQL/Supabase specialistSchema design, query optimization
python-reviewerPython code reviewPython projects
chief-of-staffCommunication triage and draftsMulti-channel email, Slack, LINE, Messenger
loop-operatorAutonomous loop executionRun loops safely, monitor stalls, intervene
harness-optimizerHarness config tuningReliability, cost, throughput

Agent Orchestration

Use agents proactively without user prompt:

  • Complex feature requests → planner
  • Code just written/modified → code-reviewer
  • Bug fix or new feature → tdd-guide
  • Architectural decision → architect
  • Security-sensitive code → security-reviewer
  • Multi-channel communication triage → chief-of-staff
  • Autonomous loops / loop monitoring → loop-operator
  • Harness config reliability and cost → harness-optimizer

Use parallel execution for independent operations — launch multiple agents simultaneously.

Security Guidelines

Before ANY commit:

  • No hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens)
  • All user inputs validated
  • SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
  • XSS prevention (sanitized HTML)
  • CSRF protection enabled
  • Authentication/authorization verified
  • Rate limiting on all endpoints
  • Error messages don't leak sensitive data

Secret management: NEVER hardcode secrets. Use environment variables or a secret manager. Validate required secrets at startup. Rotate any exposed secrets immediately.

If security issue found: STOP → use security-reviewer agent → fix CRITICAL issues → rotate exposed secrets → review codebase for similar issues.

Coding Style

Immutability (CRITICAL): Always create new objects, never mutate. Return new copies with changes applied.

File organization: Many small files over few large ones. 200-400 lines typical, 800 max. Organize by feature/domain, not by type. High cohesion, low coupling.

Error handling: Handle errors at every level. Provide user-friendly messages in UI code. Log detailed context server-side. Never silently swallow errors.

Input validation: Validate all user input at system boundaries. Use schema-based validation. Fail fast with clear messages. Never trust external data.

Code quality checklist:

  • Functions small (<50 lines), files focused (<800 lines)
  • No deep nesting (>4 levels)
  • Proper error handling, no hardcoded values
  • Readable, well-named identifiers

Testing Requirements

Minimum coverage: 80%

Test types (all required):

  1. Unit tests — Individual functions, utilities, components
  2. Integration tests — API endpoints, database operations
  3. E2E tests — Critical user flows

TDD workflow (mandatory):

  1. Write test first (RED) — test should FAIL
  2. Write minimal implementation (GREEN) — test should PASS
  3. Refactor (IMPROVE) — verify coverage 80%+

Troubleshoot failures: check test isolation → verify mocks → fix implementation (not tests, unless tests are wrong).

Development Workflow

  1. Plan — Use planner agent, identify dependencies and risks, break into phases
  2. TDD — Use tdd-guide agent, write tests first, implement, refactor
  3. Review — Use code-reviewer agent immediately, address CRITICAL/HIGH issues
  4. Capture knowledge in the right place
    • Personal debugging notes, preferences, and temporary context → auto memory
    • Team/project knowledge (architecture decisions, API changes, runbooks) → the project's existing docs structure
    • If the current task already produces the relevant docs or code comments, do not duplicate the same information elsewhere
    • If there is no obvious project doc location, ask before creating a new top-level file
  5. Commit — Conventional commits format, comprehensive PR summaries

Git Workflow

Commit format: <type>: <description> — Types: feat, fix, refactor, docs, test, chore, perf, ci

PR workflow: Analyze full commit history → draft comprehensive summary → include test plan → push with -u flag.

Architecture Patterns

API response format: Consistent envelope with success indicator, data payload, error message, and pagination metadata.

Repository pattern: Encapsulate data access behind standard interface (findAll, findById, create, update, delete). Business logic depends on abstract interface, not storage mechanism.

Skeleton projects: Search for battle-tested templates, evaluate with parallel agents (security, extensibility, relevance), clone best match, iterate within proven structure.

Performance

Context management: Avoid last 20% of context window for large refactoring and multi-file features. Lower-sensitivity tasks (single edits, docs, simple fixes) tolerate higher utilization.

Build troubleshooting: Use build-error-resolver agent → analyze errors → fix incrementally → verify after each fix.

Project Structure

agents/          — 13 specialized subagents
skills/          — 65+ workflow skills and domain knowledge
commands/        — 40 slash commands
hooks/           — Trigger-based automations
rules/           — Always-follow guidelines (common + per-language)
scripts/         — Cross-platform Node.js utilities
mcp-configs/     — 14 MCP server configurations
tests/           — Test suite

Success Metrics

  • All tests pass with 80%+ coverage
  • No security vulnerabilities
  • Code is readable and maintainable
  • Performance is acceptable
  • User requirements are met

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.