agentleFS
InditexTechInditexTech/weavejs/.agents/skills/openspec-update-change/SKILL.md

openspec-update-change

Skill246 starsChanged 46 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. 9 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 9

    Common

    Most of the 75 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    If a name is provided, use it.

    line 25
  2. Very specific:

    If ambiguous, run openspec list --json to get available changes sorted by most recently modified, and ask the user to select one

    line 28
  3. Common:

    When prompting, present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:

    line 30
  4. Very specific:

    Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., /openspec-update-change <other>).

    line 38
  5. Common:

    If the user asked for a specific revision ("the design now uses X"), that is the starting edit.

    line 55
  6. Common:

    If they only said "update" / "make this coherent", treat it as a coherence review: read the existing artifacts and check them against each …

    line 56
  7. Common:

    Read the artifact(s) the request touches and the change's other existing artifacts.

    line 59
  8. Common:

    If the change is already coherent, say so and make no edits.

    line 63
  9. Common:

    If the user rejects a revision, do not write it - leave that artifact unchanged.

    line 67
  10. Common:

    When a substantial rewrite is needed, get that artifact's rules and template first:

    line 68
  11. Common:

    After each invocation, show:

    line 80
  12. Very specific:

    Use the artifact ids and paths reported by openspec status.

    line 87
  13. Very specific:

    Do not advance the build frontier: no new artifacts, no new files under glob artifacts - that is /openspec-continue-change's job.

    line 89

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 75 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Revise a change's existing planning artifacts and keep them coherent. Never edit code.

Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.

Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.

/openspec-continue-change is an optional workflow and may not be installed. Before suggesting it anywhere below, verify that it is available. If it is unavailable, openspec status --change "<name>" --json shows the next artifact and openspec instructions "<artifact-id>" --change "<name>" --json explains how to create it.

Steps

  1. Select the change

    If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:

    • Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
    • Auto-select if only one active change exists
    • If ambiguous, run openspec list --json to get available changes sorted by most recently modified, and ask the user to select one

    When prompting, present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:

    • Change name
    • Schema (from schema field if present, otherwise "spec-driven")
    • Status (e.g., "0/5 tasks", "complete", "no tasks")
    • How recently it was modified (from lastModified field)

    Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to update.

    Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., /openspec-update-change <other>).

  2. Get the change's artifacts

    openspec status --change "<name>" --json

    Parse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:

    • schemaName: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
    • artifacts: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "skipped", "ready", "blocked")
    • isPlanningComplete: Boolean indicating if all planning artifacts are complete. Older CLI versions expose the same value as isComplete.
    • planningHome, changeRoot, artifactPaths, and actionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.

    The artifact ids and paths come from the active schema - do NOT assume them, and do NOT branch on hardcoded artifact names. Custom schemas must work unchanged.

    The files to edit are artifactPaths.<id>.existingOutputPaths - the concrete files that exist on disk, already glob-expanded for glob artifacts (e.g. specs/**/*.md). Do NOT write to resolvedOutputPath: for a glob artifact it is still the glob pattern, not a real file.

  3. Understand the request
    • If the user asked for a specific revision ("the design now uses X"), that is the starting edit.
    • If they only said "update" / "make this coherent", treat it as a coherence review: read the existing artifacts and check them against each other for contradictions, gaps, and duplication.
  4. Read and reconcile
    • Read the artifact(s) the request touches and the change's other existing artifacts.
    • Apply the requested edit. Then check every other existing artifact against it - in ANY direction: an edit to a later artifact may require revising an earlier one, not only the other way around. Build order is a useful reading order, not a constraint on which artifacts may be revised.
    • Note everything that is now inconsistent, missing, or contradictory.
    • Revise only files that already exist (existingOutputPaths). Do NOT create artifacts that don't exist yet, and do NOT invent new files under a glob artifact - note them and point the user to /openspec-continue-change to create them.
    • If the change is already coherent, say so and make no edits.
  5. Confirm and apply, one artifact at a time
    • Show each proposed revision and why. Write only after the user confirms.
    • If the user rejects a revision, do not write it - leave that artifact unchanged.
    • When a substantial rewrite is needed, get that artifact's rules and template first:
      openspec instructions "<artifact-id>" --change "<name>" --json
  6. Point to the next step (guidance only - NEVER act on it)
    • Artifacts still missing -> suggest /openspec-continue-change to create them.
    • Change already implemented (tasks checked off / already applied) -> the code may no longer match the revised plan; suggest /openspec-apply-change to carry the delta into code.
    • Everything done and implemented -> suggest /openspec-archive-change.

Output

After each invocation, show:

  • Which artifacts were revised (and which proposed revisions were rejected)
  • Anything deferred to /openspec-continue-change (not-yet-created artifacts or files)
  • Where the change stands and the recommended next command

Guardrails

  • Planning artifacts only - NEVER edit implementation code. If the revised plan implies code changes, stop and point to /openspec-apply-change.
  • Use the artifact ids and paths reported by openspec status; never branch on hardcoded artifact names.
  • Edit only the concrete files in existingOutputPaths; never write to a glob resolvedOutputPath.
  • Do not advance the build frontier: no new artifacts, no new files under glob artifacts - that is /openspec-continue-change's job.
  • Confirm every edit with the user before writing.
  • If the request changes the change's intent rather than refining it, first verify whether the optional /openspec-new-change workflow is available. If it is, recommend starting fresh with /openspec-new-change (the "Update vs. Start Fresh" heuristic). If it is unavailable, ask for a distinct unused change name and recommend openspec new change "<new-change-name>" instead.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.