agentleFS
ImmortalqxImmortalqx/my_codex_skills/research-wiki/SKILL.md

research-wiki

Skill54 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Persistent research knowledge base that accumulates papers, ideas, experiments, claims, and their relationships across a project. Inspired by Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern. Use when user says \"知识库\", \"research wiki\", \"add paper\", \"wiki query\", \"查知识库\", or wants to build/query a persistent field map.

8 other projects use a version of this, 6 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use research-review.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Yusong-EnceladusSkill

    research-review

    Get a deep critical review of research from GPT via Codex MCP. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    create the research-wiki/ directory structure

    line 70
  2. Very specific:

    create empty index.md, log.md, gap_map.md, query_pack.md

    line 71
  3. Distinctive:

    Add a paper to the wiki with the bundled helper:

    line 77
  4. Very specific:

    Use this when papers were discussed earlier but not yet ingested.

    line 118
  5. Very specific:

    If the paper was ingested with --arxiv-id and the API returned an abstract, the helper appends ## Abstract (original) at the end.

    line 165
  6. Distinctive:

    Update a specific entity and then rebuild the compact artifacts:

    line 187
  7. Very specific:

    After every update, rebuild query_pack.md and append to log.md.

    line 195
  8. Very specific:

    Write the result to LINT_REPORT.md.

    line 208
  9. Distinctive:

    Treat the wiki as a local source of truth for project memory.

    line 225
  10. Distinctive:

    Keep entity pages readable by humans first, structured enough for scripted rebuilds second.

    line 226
  11. Distinctive:

    Use canonical node IDs consistently.

    line 228
  12. Very specific:

    Keep query_pack.md deterministic and compact rather than open-ended.

    line 230
  13. Distinctive:

    If you want a rough coverage check for arXiv IDs mentioned in local project artifacts, run:

    line 234

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Research Wiki: Persistent Research Knowledge Base

Subcommand: $ARGUMENTS

Overview

The research wiki is a persistent, per-project knowledge base that accumulates structured knowledge across papers, ideas, experiments, claims, and their relationships.

Unlike one-off literature notes that are forgotten after a session, the wiki compounds: every paper page, experiment page, failed idea, and explicit relationship becomes reusable context for later work.

Inspired by Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern: compile knowledge once, keep it current, do not re-derive the same field map every time.

Core Concepts

Four Entity Types

EntityDirectoryNode ID formatWhat it represents
Paperpapers/paper:<slug>A published or preprint research paper
Ideaideas/idea:<id>A research idea, whether active, failed, or partial
Experimentexperiments/exp:<id>A concrete experiment run with evidence
Claimclaims/claim:<id>A testable scientific claim with evidence status

Typed Relationships (graph/edges.jsonl)

Edge typeFrom -> ToMeaning
extendspaper -> paperBuilds on prior work
contradictspaper -> paperDisagrees with results or claims
addresses_gappaper|idea -> gapTargets a known field gap
inspired_byidea -> paperIdea came from this paper
tested_byidea|claim -> expTested in this experiment
supportsexp -> claim|ideaExperiment supports a claim or idea
invalidatesexp -> claim|ideaExperiment disproves a claim or idea
supersedespaper -> paperNewer work replaces older work

Edges live in graph/edges.jsonl. The ## Connections section on each page is a human-readable projection of that graph and should not be hand-maintained as a second source of truth.

Wiki Directory Structure

research-wiki/
  index.md
  log.md
  gap_map.md
  query_pack.md
  papers/
    <slug>.md
  ideas/
    <idea_id>.md
  experiments/
    <exp_id>.md
  claims/
    <claim_id>.md
  graph/
    edges.jsonl

Subcommands

/research-wiki init

Initialize the wiki for the current project:

  1. create the research-wiki/ directory structure
  2. create empty index.md, log.md, gap_map.md, query_pack.md
  3. create empty graph/edges.jsonl
  4. append an initialization entry to log.md

/research-wiki ingest "<paper title>" - arxiv: <id>

Add a paper to the wiki with the bundled helper:

# arXiv-based ingest
python scripts/research_wiki.py ingest_paper research-wiki/ \
    --arxiv-id 2501.12345 --thesis "One-line claim from abstract."

# manual metadata ingest
python scripts/research_wiki.py ingest_paper research-wiki/ \
    --title "Attention Is All You Need" \
    --authors "Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer" \
    --year 2017 --venue "NeurIPS"

# add an explicit relationship after ingest
python scripts/research_wiki.py add_edge research-wiki/ \
    --from "paper:vaswani2017_attention_all_you" \
    --to "paper:chen2025_factorized_gap" \
    --type "extends" --evidence "Section 3.2 adapts the encoder block."

The helper performs:

  1. metadata fetch when --arxiv-id is provided
  2. slug generation
  3. de-duplication
  4. page creation or update
  5. index.md rebuild
  6. query_pack.md rebuild
  7. log.md append

/research-wiki sync - arxiv-ids <id1>,<id2>,...

Batch backfill one or more arXiv IDs:

python scripts/research_wiki.py sync research-wiki/ \
    --arxiv-ids 2310.06770,1706.03762

python scripts/research_wiki.py sync research-wiki/ --from-file ids.txt

Use this when papers were discussed earlier but not yet ingested. sync does not depend on hidden hooks or session traces; it only ingests the IDs you explicitly provide.

Paper Page Schema

The bundled helper emits this schema for paper pages:

---
type: paper
node_id: paper:<slug>
title: "<full title>"
authors: ["First A. Author", "Second B. Author"]
year: 2025
venue: "arXiv"
external_ids:
  arxiv: "2501.12345"
  doi: null
  s2: null
tags: ["tag1", "tag2"]
added: 2026-04-07T10:12:00Z
---

# <full title>

## One-line thesis

## Problem / Gap

## Method

## Key Results

## Assumptions

## Limitations / Failure Modes

## Reusable Ingredients

## Open Questions

## Claims

## Connections

## Relevance to This Project

If the paper was ingested with --arxiv-id and the API returned an abstract, the helper appends ## Abstract (original) at the end.

/research-wiki query "<topic>"

Generate query_pack.md, a compressed context file for later ideation, planning, or quick re-entry into the project.

Fixed budget (max 8000 chars / about 2000 tokens):

SectionBudgetContent
Project direction300 charsFrom RESEARCH_BRIEF.md if present
Top gaps1200 charsFrom gap_map.md
Paper clusters1600 charsCompact cluster summary
Failed ideas1400 charsHigh-value anti-repetition memory
Top papers1800 charsMost central / relevant paper pages
Active chains900 charsImportant relationship chains
Open unknowns500 charsUnresolved questions

Prune low-ranked paper detail first. Do not prune failed ideas first.

/research-wiki update <node_id> - <field>: <value>

Update a specific entity and then rebuild the compact artifacts:

/research-wiki update paper:chen2025 - relevance: core
/research-wiki update idea:001 - outcome: negative
/research-wiki update claim:C1 - status: invalidated

After every update, rebuild query_pack.md and append to log.md.

/research-wiki lint

Health check the wiki:

  1. orphan pages
  2. stale claims
  3. contradictory evidence
  4. papers that probably need explicit links
  5. dead ideas
  6. sparse pages

Write the result to LINT_REPORT.md.

/research-wiki stats

Produce a quick project overview:

Research Wiki Stats
Papers: 28
Ideas: 7
Experiments: 12
Claims: 15
Edges: 64

Operating Style

  • Treat the wiki as a local source of truth for project memory.
  • Keep entity pages readable by humans first, structured enough for scripted rebuilds second.
  • Record failed ideas explicitly; they are valuable memory.
  • Use canonical node IDs consistently.
  • Append to log.md for every mutation.
  • Keep query_pack.md deterministic and compact rather than open-ended.

Optional Diagnostic

If you want a rough coverage check for arXiv IDs mentioned in local project artifacts, run:

bash scripts/verify_wiki_coverage.sh research-wiki/

This is diagnostic only. It should report gaps, not block the wiki.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.