web-discovery-artifacts
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Create or validate robots, sitemaps, canonicals, social metadata, JSON-LD, security.txt, llms.txt, indexes, and feeds. Use for public-web discovery and indexing; select only justified artifacts.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- apply-project-updatesSkill
- audit-project-updatesSkill
- design-agent-capabilitySkill
- engineer-cli-toolsSkill
- maintain-agent-instructionsSkill
- maintain-project-docsSkill
- maintain-project-memorySkill
- maintain-web-design-systemSkill
- prepare-web-assetsSkill
- red-team-technical-planSkill
- release-web-applicationSkill
- research-software-versionsSkill
- verify-software-changeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 10
When Portable Web Toolkit manages the project, use its generators and discovery-doctor as the specialist authority.
- Distinctive: line 22
Prefer a supported framework integration over a custom generator when it satisfies the requirements.
- Very specific: line 25
Do not present llms.txt or other emerging conventions as universally adopted standards.
- Distinctive: line 43
Avoid hand-maintained URL duplication.
- Distinctive: line 46
Keep build-time and runtime generation consistent.
- Distinctive: line 49
Keep structured data factual, page-specific, and aligned with visible content.
- Very specific: line 51
Use references/validation.md for protocol-specific checks.
- Distinctive: line 75
When deployment is authorized, verify live responses rather than only build artifacts.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Web Discovery Artifacts
Generate consistent discovery output from verified route and metadata sources.
When Portable Web Toolkit manages the project, use its generators and
discovery-doctor as the specialist authority. Do not create a second route
inventory, discovery generator, or deployment gate.
Determine intent
- Establish whether the site is public, private, staged, or intentionally non-indexed.
- Identify authoritative route, origin, locale, content, ownership, image, and update-date sources.
- Inventory framework integrations and existing generated artifacts.
- Choose only outputs with a clear consumer and maintenance path.
- Prefer a supported framework integration over a custom generator when it satisfies the requirements.
Do not present llms.txt or other emerging conventions as universally adopted
standards.
Candidate outputs
robots.txtsitemap.xmlor sitemap index- canonical and alternate-language links
- Open Graph and platform-specific social metadata
- JSON-LD matching visible page content
/.well-known/security.txtllms.txtor a project-defined AI-readable index- content or search feeds
humans.txtwhen the project has a reason to publish it
Build one source of truth
- Derive related outputs from shared route and metadata data.
- Avoid hand-maintained URL duplication.
- Include only canonical, public, resolvable routes.
- Make environment origin and indexing policy explicit.
- Keep build-time and runtime generation consistent.
- Fail generation on material invalidity only when the repository intends that as a build gate.
- Keep structured data factual, page-specific, and aligned with visible content.
Use references/validation.md for protocol-specific checks.
Environment safety
Production should publish the intended canonical origin and crawler policy. Preview, staging, and development should prevent accidental indexing where appropriate and must not leak private routes, internal APIs, secret-bearing URLs, or production-only data.
Validate
Check:
- syntax and schema
- canonical host and protocol consistency
- route coverage and exclusions
- duplicate, redirected, or broken URLs
- content type and cache behavior
- environment-specific robots and canonical behavior
- image dimensions and resolvability
- JSON-LD correspondence with page content
- security-contact ownership and expiry
- generated-output freshness
When deployment is authorized, verify live responses rather than only build artifacts. Report selected outputs, source of truth, environment behavior, checks, and unresolved gaps.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

