agentleFS
HyunKNHyunKN/harness-kit/skills/decision-recording/SKILL.md

decision-recording

Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when a repository should capture a high-impact engineering decision in `docs/records` instead of leaving the reasoning in chat history. Trigger for architecture changes, dependency choices, operating-rule changes, or decisions that would be expensive to reverse later.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write the chosen direction and its consequences.

    line 17
  2. Very specific:

    Prefer docs/records/ for the note and update the records index when the decision matters beyond one task.

    line 19
  3. Very specific:

    Use technical-learning-note for how the implementation works and issue-driven-workflow for task-local execution state.

    line 37

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Decision Recording

Capture the why behind non-trivial engineering choices so later work does not depend on memory.

This skill is for durable decision rationale, not implementation walkthroughs.

Default flow

  1. Confirm the decision is real, accepted, and worth keeping.
  2. Record the context that forced the decision.
  3. List the main options that were considered.
  4. Write the chosen direction and its consequences.
  5. Link evidence such as issue docs, incidents, experiments, or benchmarks.
  6. Prefer docs/records/ for the note and update the records index when the decision matters beyond one task.

Good fit

  • selecting or removing a dependency
  • changing architecture boundaries
  • introducing a strong guardrail or operating rule
  • choosing a workflow that other contributors must follow

Avoid for

  • obvious implementation details
  • temporary experiments that are not yet accepted
  • one-off edits with no lasting downstream effect

Resources

  • See references/decision-checklist.md for the minimum record contents.
  • Use technical-learning-note for how the implementation works and issue-driven-workflow for task-local execution state.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.