bootstrap-stack
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Grow the stack-agnostic seed into a concrete language stack (Python or TypeScript/Node/Bun, Go, Rust) — enabling tools, language config, a sample test, and wiring the mise lint/test/ build tasks. Use only when the user explicitly runs /bootstrap-stack <lang>.
- Installs packages
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- kohj1018/agentic-dev-harnesstheir own version, first seen Sep 29, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- kohj1018/agentic-dev-harness★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/00-defer-to-agents-md.mdcCursor rule
- distillSkill
- extract-versionSkill
- learnSkill
- reflectSkill
- seed-updateSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 13
Add the $ARGUMENTS stack to this seed.
- Very specific: line 26
Run mise run check and confirm it passes.
- Very specific: line 33
Add a [tool.ruff] section.
- Distinctive: line 55
Keep changes minimal and idiomatic for the chosen stack.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Add the $ARGUMENTS stack to this seed. Ask first if $ARGUMENTS is empty or ambiguous.
General steps (adapt to $ARGUMENTS):
- Enable tools in
mise.toml: uncomment (or add) the relevant[tools]lines, then runmise install. - Create the language config at repo root (see per-stack details below).
- Wire
mise.tomltasks solint,test, andbuildare no longer no-ops — replace theirechoplaceholders with the real commands. - Add a tiny sample (one source file + one passing test) under
src/somise run checkproves the toolchain end-to-end. - Update
AGENTS.md: the Commands table, Project structure, Testing, and Code style sections to reflect the real stack. - Run
mise run checkand confirm it passes. Then, if git is initialized, commit:chore: bootstrap $ARGUMENTS stack.
python
- Tools:
python = "3.13",uv = "latest",ruff = "latest". uv init→pyproject.toml; addruff+pytestas dev deps (uv add --dev ruff pytest).- Add a
[tool.ruff]section. Tasks:lint = "ruff check .",fmtalso runsruff format .,test = "uv run pytest -q",build = "uv build". - Sample:
src/example.py+tests/test_example.py.
typescript / node
- Tools:
node = "lts",pnpm = "latest","npm:@biomejs/biome" = "latest". pnpm init; addtypescript,vitest,@biomejs/biome(pnpm add -D ...); createtsconfig.jsonandbiome.json.- Tasks:
lint = "biome check .",fmtalso runsbiome format --write .,test = "pnpm vitest run",build = "pnpm tsc -p tsconfig.json". - Sample:
src/example.ts+src/example.test.ts.
bun
- Tools:
bun = "latest".bun init; tasks usebun test/bun build. Use Biome for lint/fmt.
go / rust
- Tools:
go = "latest"orrust = "latest". Standard layout; tasks usego test ./.../cargo test,go build ./.../cargo build. Keepdprintfor md/json/toml.
Keep changes minimal and idiomatic for the chosen stack; don't pull in frameworks unless asked.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

