agentleFS
HeyEddi-comHeyEddi-com/heyeddi-skills/skills/ux-flow-auditor/SKILL.md

ux-flow-auditor

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Traces user task flows with Playwright: click depth, step success, friction: and writes reports to .heyeddi/docs/ux-flows/. Use when measuring ease of use, clicks to complete a task, or onboarding friction. Not for static visual critique (use heyeddi-design critique) or layout screenshots (use visual-auditor).

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read reference/cross-pillar-handoff.md.

    line 18
  2. Very specific:

    Ensure .heyeddi/product.md defines user tasks (optional context).

    line 50
  3. Very specific:

    Add or edit .heyeddi/docs/ux-flows/<task-id>.flow.json with steps (expect, fill, click).

    line 52
  4. Very specific:

    Start dev server; set DEV_SERVER_URL if not http://localhost:5173.

    line 53
  5. Very specific:

    After @heyeddi-handoff / @heyeddi-design: verify tasks are completable

    line 85

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

UX Flow Auditor

Task-oriented UX: how many clicks to achieve a goal, where users get stuck.

All artifacts go under .heyeddi/docs/ and .heyeddi/audits/: never repo root.

Cross-pillar sync (mandatory)

Read reference/cross-pillar-handoff.md. Bookend every flow trace:

@heyeddi  load_workflow_context --route /path
trace_flow …
update ux-flows report + friction notes
@heyeddi  append_pillar_opinion --pillar ux …
→ @heyeddi-product updates AC if needed; @heyeddi-design notes layout friction

When to use

  • "How many clicks to update settings?"
  • Post-ship ease-of-use check
  • Compare desktop vs mobile flow (separate flow JSON or viewport)
  • Product acceptance: task completes within click budget

Subagents (default)

See reference/subagents.md. Run trace_flow.py via Task shell (needs dev server + Playwright).

Pipeline

init_ux_flows          → ux-flows.md index + example .flow.json
define steps in ux-flows/<task>.flow.json
trace_flow --task-id   → ux-flows/<task>.md + audit screenshot
agent adds friction notes to report

Instructions

  1. Ensure .heyeddi/product.md defines user tasks (optional context).
  2. python scripts/init_ux_flows.py --project-root <root> once per project.
  3. Add or edit .heyeddi/docs/ux-flows/<task-id>.flow.json with steps (expect, fill, click).
  4. Start dev server; set DEV_SERVER_URL if not http://localhost:5173.
  5. python scripts/trace_flow.py --task-id <id> --project-root <root> --check
  6. Append Friction notes to the generated markdown report.

Flow JSON schema

{
  "task_id": "update-profile",
  "goal": "User saves profile",
  "start_route": "/settings",
  "max_clicks": 4,
  "viewport_width": 1440,
  "steps": [
    { "action": "expect", "selector": ".settings .p-inputtext", "label": "Form visible" },
    { "action": "fill", "selector": ".settings input >> nth=0", "value": "Alex", "label": "Name" },
    { "action": "click", "selector": "button:has-text('Save')", "label": "Save" }
  ]
}

.heyeddi/ outputs

PathPurpose
.heyeddi/docs/ux-flows.mdIndex of tasks, budgets, last run
.heyeddi/docs/ux-flows/<task>.flow.jsonMachine-readable steps
.heyeddi/docs/ux-flows/<task>.mdHuman report + friction notes
.heyeddi/audits/ux-flow/Step screenshots

Chain

  • After @heyeddi-handoff / @heyeddi-design: verify tasks are completable
  • @visual-auditor: layout proof; this skill: interaction proof
  • @engineering-excellence: separate concern (code structure)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.