wiki-teacher
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Portfolio-aware project accountability for several concurrent projects — /checkin, a forcing function auto-suggested at session start. Surfaces 1–2 projects that genuinely need attention (never a dump of everything overdue), batch-elicits priority when it's needed instead of asking one per day, and answers "what should I work on" even when nothing's overdue. State lives declaratively in each project note's own frontmatter (priority, checkin_interval, status) — no separate tracking mechanism. Triggers on "check in on my projects," "what should I be working on," and the command /checkin. Requires the obsidian-vault MCP server connected. Deliberately narrow for now — see the note below.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-evalSkill
- agent-redteamSkill
- broadcastSkill
- deid-reid-harnessSkill
- fiction-workshopSkill
- issue-reconcilerSkill
- privacy-linterSkill
- privacy-threat-oracleSkill
- repo-pincerSkill
- research-ledgerSkill
- review-and-planSkill
- style-obfuscatorSkill
- wiki-governorSkill
- wiki-librarianSkill
- wiki-operatorSkill
- wiki-privacy-auditSkill
- wiki-synthesizerSkill
- wiki-warehouseSkill
- my-skill-nameSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 23
Elicit missing signal, don't fabricate it: When priority is needed and undeclared, ask — never default it.
- Very specific: line 43
After any run, set last_checkin in Maps/_context.md to today.
- Very specific: line 47
Never auto-run /checkin — session start only suggests it.
- Distinctive: line 49
If MCP tools are unavailable, stop and tell the user — do not simulate vault operations in the conversation.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Wiki Teacher
Portfolio-aware project accountability — not a passive reference. /checkin surfaces what genuinely needs attention across several concurrent projects, without turning into either a nag or a dump.
Currently /checkin only. /teach (project-scoped teaching) and /reflect (portfolio-wide mentoring) were part of the original three-command design but are deliberately held back — neither has ever run against real usage or had any real critique pass, unlike /checkin, which has now survived three rounds of scrutiny (a dry-run in the original design, a privacy review, and a from-scratch prose walkthrough that found real gaps). Shipping them alongside a validated /checkin would dress up unvalidated behavior in credibility it hasn't earned. They come back once /checkin has real mileage and an actual felt need surfaces — see knowledge-os/sitrep.md for the full history.
Prerequisites
The obsidian-vault MCP server must be connected. Verify with /mcp before running.
Reference implementation: /checkin's narrowing algorithm — the batch bootstrap, the priority sort, the tie-margin, the cap, and the "what should I work on" fallback — plus portfolio breadth (active count, days since anything last completed) are mechanical enough to script: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/wiki_teacher.py, tested both against synthetic cases and against real parsed files on disk (test_wiki_teacher.py). Check a real run's output against it; treat a mismatch as a bug in the run, not in the script.
Note on commands: /checkin is a natural-language trigger — write it in the chat window. It is NOT a Claude Code CLI slash command.
Principles
- Portfolio-aware, not single-project. Several concurrent projects are the expected case, not an edge case.
- Elicit missing signal, don't fabricate it. When
priorityis needed and undeclared, ask — never default it. A guessed default would just reintroduce the exact ranking problem declaringpriorityexists to solve. - Stateless — the vault is the state substrate.
priority,checkin_interval, andstatuslive in the project note's own frontmatter (seewiki-operator's note schema). No teacher-owned tracking file, no computed ease-factor. - Growth-mindset tone, not a verdict. Describe what's observed — "3 projects are overdue" is a fact; "you're falling behind" is a verdict. Stick to the fact.
Cadence & session start
At session start, read Maps/_context.md. If last_checkin is not today, check whether any non-paused/complete project is flaggable (see /checkin below). If at least one is, suggest running /checkin — never run it unprompted. If nothing is flaggable, skip silently; a suggestion with nothing to say is worse than no suggestion. Throttled to once per day regardless of how many sessions start.
/checkin
Surface 1–2 projects that genuinely need attention — never a dump of everything overdue. Answers both "what have I neglected" (accountability) and, when nothing's overdue, "what should I work on" — the second half didn't exist in the first build even though this skill's own description already promised that trigger phrase; see compute_checkin()'s explicit_request parameter below.
- Retrieve all
type: projectnotes fromProjects/only (query_frontmatterwithfolder: Projects) —Templates/Projectcarriestype: projectin its frontmatter and an unscoped query would treat the template as a real project. Exclude any withstatus: pausedorstatus: completeentirely — the off-ramp. - For each remaining project, it's flaggable once
days_since(updated) ≥ checkin_interval(default 14 if the field is absent). - If one or more flaggable projects have no
prioritydeclared, that's the check-in — ask about all of them in one pass, not one per day. Staleness alone can't rank importance — a purely date-derived score puts differently-important projects within noise of each other — but eliciting them one at a time across multiple sessions would make the system nearly useless with several concurrent projects, since nothing can be narrowed until priorities are known. Ask about every priority-less flaggable project together: "3 projects are overdue and don't have a declared priority — quick pass: [[A]], [[B]], [[C]] — high, medium, or low for each?" Write each answer back withpatch_frontmatteras it's given. Once every flaggable project has a priority — including ones just answered in this same exchange — proceed immediately to step 4 in the same run. Don't make the user invoke/checkina second time just to see the result of the bootstrap they just did. - Once priorities are known, narrow among flaggable projects: sort by
priority(high → medium → low), then bydays_since(updated) ÷ checkin_intervalas a tiebreaker within a tier. Surface the top item. Include a second only if it shares the sameprioritytier as the first and its overdue-ratio is within 15% of it — a real tie, not a forced pair. Cap at 2, always. Reference implementation of this exact rule (bootstrap batching, the sort, the tie-margin, the cap) in${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/wiki_teacher.py'scompute_checkin()— check a real run against it rather than trusting the prose alone. - Any flaggable projects beyond the surfaced 1–2 get one passive line: "N other projects are also overdue — say 'show all' to see them."
- Nothing flaggable, but explicitly asked ("what should I work on," a direct
/checkininvocation, not the silent session-start check): don't just say there's nothing to report. Rank all active projects with a declaredpriority(staleness doesn't gate this — nothing here is overdue) and suggest the highest-priority one, tie-broken by whichever has sat untouched longest. If no active project has a declared priority either, say so plainly and offer to set some — don't force a full bootstrap pass for an idle question with no urgency behind it, but don't guess either.compute_checkin(..., explicit_request=True)implements this exactly —"suggested"or"no_signal". - Nothing flaggable, silent session-start check: skip entirely — a suggestion with nothing to say is worse than no suggestion. This is the one case where step 6's fallback does not apply; a proactive suggestion is only useful when actually asked for, never as an unprompted nag.
- Passively report portfolio breadth:
portfolio_breadth()inwiki_teacher.pygives the active project count and days since anything last completed — append one neutral line, e.g. "5 active projects." No framing, no threshold, no "that's a lot" — just the count. - After any run, set
last_checkininMaps/_context.mdto today.
Output discipline
- Never auto-run
/checkin— session start only suggests it. - Growth-mindset framing: state what's observed as a fact, never as a verdict on the person.
- If MCP tools are unavailable, stop and tell the user — do not simulate vault operations in the conversation.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

