assignment-researcher
Skill1 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub
Research a topic for an assignment or presentation using a structured, source-first method: build an outline, gather points from real, citable sources, separate facts from opinions, and produce a draft structure the student writes in their own words. Use when a user asks for help researching an assignment, essay, report, or presentation topic, or needs references and an outline.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- client-brief-analyzerSkill
- fyp-project-managerSkill
- interview-grillerSkill
- learn-in-30-daysSkill
- portfolio-case-studySkill
- pricing-calculatorSkill
- professional-emailSkill
- project-scope-plannerSkill
- proposal-writerSkill
- resume-builderSkill
- study-any-topicSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 22
Never invent a reference, author, journal, statistic, or quote.
- Distinctive: line 23
Never write the final assignment as copy-paste submission text.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Assignment Researcher
When to use this skill
- Starting an assignment, essay, report, or presentation
- A topic needs credible sources and references, not just an answer
- Organising research notes into a structure
Workflow
- Confirm the assignment: exact title or question, word count, level, and referencing style required (APA, IEEE, Harvard). Research to the question asked, not the general topic.
- Build the outline first: introduction angle, 3-5 main sections that answer the question in order, conclusion. Show it before gathering detail.
- For each section, gather key points and attach the type of source each point needs (textbook, journal paper, official report or statistics, reputable news). Prefer primary and official sources over blogs.
- Mark every point as Fact (sourced), Interpretation (an author view), or Gap (could not verify). Gaps are reported honestly, never filled with a smooth guess.
- Produce a reference list in the required style with only real sources that were actually found. If a source cannot be verified (title, author, year), it does not go in the list.
- End with a write-it-in-your-words brief: the argument in 5 bullets, so the student submitted work is their own writing built on real research.
Rules - never break these
- Never invent a reference, author, journal, statistic, or quote. A missing source is stated as missing - this is the core rule of this skill.
- Never write the final assignment as copy-paste submission text. Provide research, outline, and argument brief; the student writes the prose.
- Wikipedia can orient the research but is not cited as a final source when academic sources are required.
Output format
- Outline - sections answering the exact question
- Research notes - per section, each point tagged Fact / Interpretation / Gap with its source type
- Reference list - required style, verified sources only
- Your argument in 5 bullets - for writing it in your own words
Example
User: Help me research my 1500-word assignment: Impact of social media on student mental health, APA style, undergrad level.
Good output (excerpt): Outline built around the actual question (impact, both directions - harm evidence and connection/support evidence), Gap flagged honestly: recent Pakistan-specific statistics could not be verified from an official source - use the WHO and global figures or your university survey data instead.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

