agentleFS
Harish-hereHarish-here/maddog/skills/mine-session/SKILL.md

mine-session

Skill3 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub

Extracts reusable collaboration patterns from a working session. Invoke with "arm" at the START of any session likely to involve iteration, correction, or unfamiliar ground — capture then runs as you work. Invoke with "distill" at session end to mine. Use when a session produced — or is expected to produce — surprise: corrections, rework, near-misses, an invented procedure, wasted effort. Do NOT use as a session summarizer or changelog — answer that directly, or hand it to a summarizing skill if one is installed; this extracts the way of working, never the work's content. Do NOT use to evaluate people — feedback on a person is theirs to ask for directly; this mines the collaboration only.

The file

Files
SKILL.md

A session emits two products: the deliverable, and the way of working that produced it. The first is captured by the repo; the second decays to zero when the session ends unless it is externalized. This skill externalizes it. Learning lives only where expectation and outcome diverged — mine surprise, not activity.

SCOPE FENCE — four boundaries, none negotiable:

  • Main thread only. Detours and tangents from the session's purpose are not weighed, however interesting.
  • Process only. The work's content belongs to the project; only the way of working is extracted. A pattern that restates domain knowledge is not a pattern.
  • Evidence without exposure. Every pattern cites the event it came from, but never quotes secrets, credentials, or sensitive content.
  • Collaboration, not collaborators. No pattern assesses a person; the unit of analysis is the working relationship's moves, never the people making them.

THE LEDGER — two append-only files, outside the project tree so working notes are never accidentally committed, under the user-level Claude directory at ~/.claude/mining/<slug>/, where <slug> is the project's absolute path, slugified. The user may name a different location when invoking — an override, never a question the skill asks.

  • capture.md — capture appends here and nothing else touches it. Arm opens the session with a marker line; capture and distill's reconstruction append stamped lines: SESSION START [YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm] [YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm] event — one line, concrete enough to relocate [YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm] (r) event — same, reconstructed at distill Lines above this session's SESSION START marker belong to earlier sessions: carried forward and attributed to their own stamp, never re-mined as the current session's.
  • register.md — distill appends here and nothing else touches it: after processing, one watermark line PROCESSED THROUGH [YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm] and one entry per candidate
    • rung N | trigger -> move -> effect | evidence: [stamp of its line] Capture lines after the last watermark are unprocessed. THE REGISTER IS IDEMPOTENT ON EVIDENCE STAMP: the latest entry for a given evidence stamp is the candidate's state — an entry appended for a stamp that already appears supersedes the earlier one, and one stamp never counts twice toward recurrence, however the duplicate arrived. Nothing in either file is ever rewritten — concurrent sessions interleave appends recoverably instead of overwriting each other.

PHASE 1 — CAPTURE (armed by invoking with "arm"). Append one stamped line per surprise to capture.md, as it happens. Capture is deliberately cheap: no classification (that is distill's job) — the only care taken at capture time is the fence's redaction. Stated plainly, because it is true everywhere: nothing can detect a skipped capture line — continuous capture is a discipline, not an enforceable rule, and distill's reconstruction pass exists precisely because capture will sometimes fail. If armed late, say so: capture covers only what remains reachable from here.

ORE CLASSES — five, applied at distill; each borrowed from a discipline older than this skill — extend by discipline, not by anecdote:

  1. CORRECTIONS — the principal redirects the agent (calibration training). The highest-grade ore: every correction marks a miscalibration.
  2. FRICTION — rework, error-and-repair, near-misses (postmortem and incident-learning culture). Lessons live where things caught.
  3. REPETITION — a move performed about three times by hand (the refactoring rule of three). A candidate for extraction or automation.
  4. DEAD SPEND — effort that changed nothing (lean waste). Ore for what to REMOVE from the process, not add.
  5. CONFIRMED WINS — a move that worked and would decay unwritten. Survivorship-prone: this class needs the strictest evidence.

PHASE 2 — DISTILL (invoked with "distill", at session end or later).

  • Reconstruct first: sweep the reachable context for surprises not already in capture.md, whether capture ran or not — armed capture is never assumed complete. Append each reconstructed surprise to capture.md as an (r) line before going further, so the watermark covers it and no later distill re-mines it. Reconstruction is weaker than capture at the moment, and the report says which mode produced each line.
  • Then gate: zero captured, zero reconstructible, AND no carried-forward lines from earlier sessions means "nothing to mine" — report exactly that and stop. An empty mine is a finding, not a failure.
  • Process carried-forward lines first, attributed to their own sessions.
  • Bind: every candidate must point at its concrete event. A pattern that cannot cite its evidence is not extracted, whatever it claims.
  • Shape: a keepable pattern is a triple — TRIGGER (the situation you would recognize next time), MOVE (what to do), EFFECT (what changes). Missing a trigger, it is a platitude; missing a move, an observation; missing an effect, unfalsifiable. All three or it stays in the ground.
  • Route: write each pattern to the strongest available home that is DURABLE (survives the session), DISCOVERABLE (surfaces when its trigger occurs, not by luck), and BINDING (something re-invokes it — a tool, a habit, a test, a person). Instruction files, persistent memory, a skill, a hook, a test are all homes when present; the floor that always exists is a user-owned file, and routing there says so rather than pretending it binds.
  • Promote by recurrence, never by enthusiasm: observation → recorded candidate (with evidence) → confirmed (recurred in a later session) → institutionalized (moved to a stronger, more binding home). The register carries each candidate's rung; distill appends an updated entry for the ones this session confirmed. One session is a hypothesis; doctrine takes three.
  • Where the installation has a gated authoring path for load-bearing instruction text, institutionalization flows through it; absent one, institutionalization means writing the pattern into the strongest home available and saying plainly that no gate reviewed it. Where a second intelligence is available, split extraction from evaluation. Neither is assumed: evidence-binding is the portable floor against the miner grading its own session.

OUTPUT — the mining report, and nothing else changes hands: MINED: per pattern — class, evidence event, capture or reconstruction, trigger/move/effect, home written, ladder rung. LEFT IN THE GROUND: candidates not extracted, each with the leg it failed (no evidence, no trigger, no move, no effect, out of scope). LEDGER: where it lives, the new watermark, what carries forward. Report honestly when the session was rich in activity and poor in surprise — a productive session with nothing to mine is common, and saying so is cheaper than manufacturing insight.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.