dr-status
Skill4 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Show research progress dashboard. Displays completed/failed/remaining task counts, phase status, data completeness, and recent changelog entries.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 12
Read todo.md and count:
- Very specific: line 22
Read .research/ROADMAP.md and show each phase with its status (NOT_STARTED, IN_PROGRESS, COMPLETE).
- Very specific: line 38
Read all sidecar files (data/*.adversary.json).
- Very specific: line 40
Error handling: If a sidecar file contains malformed JSON, skip it, note "[WARNING] Malformed sidecar: {filename}" in the dashboard output, …
- Very specific: line 52
If no sidecar files exist AND provenance exists in data files → show Trust: -- (adversary not yet run)
- Distinctive: line 53
If no sidecar files exist AND no provenance exists → show nothing (trust section omitted)
- Very specific: line 54
If --no-adversary was used (detected by: provenance exists in data files but zero sidecar files AND the CHANGELOG contains an entry with …
- Distinctive: line 55
If sidecar files exist → show full trust dashboard
- Very specific: line 105
All phases complete → "Run /dr-report to synthesize findings."
- Very specific: line 110
If todo.md is missing, tell the user to run /dr-new first.
- Distinctive: line 111
If no data files exist yet, show task counts and phases only.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
You are displaying a research progress dashboard. Read the project files and present a clear status overview.
Steps
1. Task Counts
Read todo.md and count:
[x]— completed tasks[!]— failed tasks[ ]— remaining tasks- Total tasks
Break down by phase (P1.xx, P2.xx, etc.).
2. Phase Status
Read .research/ROADMAP.md and show each phase with its status (NOT_STARTED, IN_PROGRESS, COMPLETE).
3. Data Completeness
For each file in data/:
- Count total entries
- For each required schema field, calculate the percentage that are NOT
"NOT_FOUND",null, or empty - Flag fields with >30% NOT_FOUND rate
- Note any CONFLICTING or UNVERIFIED values
4. Recent Activity
Show the last 10 entries from .research/CHANGELOG.md.
5. Trust Score
Read all sidecar files (data/*.adversary.json). For each sidecar file:
- Parse the JSON array of adversary verdicts
- Error handling: If a sidecar file contains malformed JSON, skip it, note
"[WARNING] Malformed sidecar: {filename}"in the dashboard output, and continue processing other files - Count verdicts by type: confirmed, refuted, weakened, unverifiable, and count claims still
pending(claims with provenance but no matching sidecar verdict)
Calculate:
adversary_survival_rate:(confirmed + weakened) / (confirmed + weakened + refuted). Exclude pending and unverifiable from denominator.mean_survival_score: averagesurvival_scoreacross all adversary-reviewed claims (those with verdict != pending)pending_count: claims with provenance envelopes but no adversary verdict yettotal_reviewed: confirmed + weakened + refuted + unverifiable
Find the top 5 most-attacked entities by count of refuted + weakened verdicts. For each, find the claim with the lowest survival_score.
Display logic:
- If no sidecar files exist AND provenance exists in data files → show
Trust: -- (adversary not yet run) - If no sidecar files exist AND no provenance exists → show nothing (trust section omitted)
- If
--no-adversarywas used (detected by: provenance exists in data files but zero sidecar files AND the CHANGELOG contains an entry withAdversary: disabled) → showAdversary: disabled - If sidecar files exist → show full trust dashboard
6. Dashboard Output
Print a formatted dashboard:
## Research Progress
Phase | Status | Done | Failed | Remaining
------|-------------|------|--------|----------
P1 | COMPLETE | 18 | 2 | 0
P2 | IN_PROGRESS | 5 | 1 | 14
P3 | NOT_STARTED | 0 | 0 | 20
P4 | NOT_STARTED | 0 | 0 | 25
Total: 23 done, 3 failed, 59 remaining (85 total)
Overall: 27% complete
## Data Completeness
File | Entries | Completeness
------------------------|---------|-------------
data/companies-p1.json | 18 | 82%
data/companies-p2.json | 5 | 75%
Fields below 70%: funding_amount (45%), employee_count (62%)
## Trust Score
Trust: 87% survived | Score: 0.74
Adversary: 45/52 claims reviewed (7 pending)
## Most Attacked
Entity | Refuted | Weakened | Lowest claim
-----------------|---------|----------|-----------------------------
Regie.ai | 2 | 1 | "funding: $30M" (0.12)
Orum | 0 | 2 | "employee_count: 60" (0.42)
## Recent Activity
[last 10 changelog entries]7. Suggest Next Action
Based on the state:
- Unchecked tasks remain → "Run
/dr-runto continue execution." - Phase just completed → "Run
/dr-reviewto validate data quality, then/dr-improveto optimize the researcher." - All phases complete → "Run
/dr-reportto synthesize findings." - High failure rate (>30%) → "Run
/dr-improveto analyze failures and improve the researcher."
Error Handling
- If todo.md is missing, tell the user to run
/dr-newfirst. - If no data files exist yet, show task counts and phases only.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

