github-actions-workflows
Skill30 starsChanged 9 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Secure CI/CD workflows with GitHub Actions for TypeScript 6.0.2 / Node.js 25 MCP server — 12 pipelines, SLSA Level 3, SBOM, OpenSSF Scorecard
- Reads credentials
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 11
Create and maintain secure, efficient CI/CD pipelines using GitHub Actions for this TypeScript 6.0.2 / Node.js 25 MCP server project with …
- Distinctive: line 112
Security: No critical/high CodeQL alerts
- Distinctive: line 113
Dependencies: No known high/critical vulnerabilities
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
GitHub Actions Workflows Skill
Purpose
Create and maintain secure, efficient CI/CD pipelines using GitHub Actions for this TypeScript 6.0.2 / Node.js 25 MCP server project with 12 automated workflows.
When to Use
- ✅ Setting up or modifying CI/CD pipelines for TypeScript MCP projects
- ✅ Automating security scans (CodeQL, dependency review, SLSA, SBOM)
- ✅ Implementing npm package publishing with attestation
- ✅ Configuring test/coverage reporting and quality gates
- ✅ Understanding the 8-stage pipeline architecture
Current Pipeline Architecture (12 Workflows)
| Stage | Workflow | Trigger | Purpose |
| 1. Code Validation | dependency-review.yml, labeler.yml | PR | Dependency audit, auto-labeling |
| 2. Build & Test | test-and-report.yml | Push, PR | Lint, build, test, coverage (80%+) |
| 3. Security Analysis | codeql.yml | Push, PR, Weekly | CodeQL SAST scanning |
| 4. Integration Testing | integration-tests.yml | Push, PR, Daily | E2E tests against EP API |
| 5. Release & Publish | release.yml | Tag v*, Manual | npm publish with attestation |
| 6. Supply Chain | sbom-generation.yml, slsa-provenance.yml | Push (main), Tag v*, Release publish, Manual | CycloneDX/SPDX SBOM, SLSA Level 3 |
| 7. Continuous Monitoring | scorecard.yml | Push, Weekly | OpenSSF Scorecard |
| 8. Repository Management | setup-labels.yml, copilot-setup-steps.yml, refresh-stats.yml | Manual, Push, Schedule | Labels, Copilot environment, Stats refresh |
CI/CD Pattern (Node.js 25 + TypeScript 6.0.2)
name: Test and Report
on:
push:
branches: [main]
pull_request:
branches: [main]
permissions:
contents: read
checks: write
jobs:
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: step-security/harden-runner@fe104658747b27e96e4f7e80cd0a94068e53901d # v2.16.1
with:
egress-policy: audit
- uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd # v6.0.2
- uses: actions/setup-node@53b83947a5a98c8d113130e565377fae1a50d02f # v6.3.0
with:
node-version: '25'
cache: 'npm'
- run: npm ci
- run: npm run lint
- run: npm run build
- run: npm run test:coverageSecurity Best Practices (Enforced)
- ✅ Pin action versions with SHA hashes — not tags (supply chain integrity)
- ✅ Prefer
npm ciin CI workflows — reproducible installs from lockfile; some jobs may usenpm installwhere needed - ✅ Minimize GITHUB_TOKEN permissions — per-job
permissionsblocks - ✅ step-security/harden-runner — egress auditing on most workflows
- ✅ Dependency review — block PRs introducing known vulnerabilities
- ✅ CodeQL weekly + on-push — continuous SAST scanning
- ✅ SLSA Level 3 provenance — verifiable build attestation
- ✅ CycloneDX + SPDX SBOM — software bill of materials on release
- ✅ OpenSSF Scorecard — continuous security posture monitoring
- ✅ Dependabot — automated dependency updates
Test Reporting
- name: Run tests with coverage
run: npm run test:coverage
- name: Upload coverage
uses: codecov/codecov-action@e28ff129e5465c2c0dcc6f003fc735cb6ae0c673 # v4.5.0
with:
files: ./coverage/lcov.infoRelease Pipeline with Attestation
release:
if: startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/v')
permissions:
contents: write
id-token: write
attestations: write
steps:
- run: npm ci && npm run build
- run: npm publish --provenance --access public
env:
NODE_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }}
- uses: actions/attest-build-provenance@a2bbfa25375fe432b6a289bc6b6cd05ecd0c4c32 # v4.1.0Quality Gates
- Lint: Zero ESLint errors (TypeScript strict mode)
- Type check:
tsc --noEmitpasses - Tests: 80%+ coverage, 1130+ unit tests, 71 E2E test cases across 4 spec files
- Security: No critical/high CodeQL alerts
- Dependencies: No known high/critical vulnerabilities
- Unused code:
npx knipcheck passes
ISMS Policy References
Core policies:
- Secure Development Policy — CI/CD security requirements, CodeQL, SAST/DAST, SBOM, SLSA Level 3, signed releases
- Open Source Policy — Supply-chain security, dependency pinning, OSSF Scorecard, SLSA provenance
- Information Security Policy — Pipeline as critical security control
Supporting policies:
- Access Control Policy — Least-privilege
GITHUB_TOKEN, fine-grainedpermissions:blocks - Cryptography Policy — Signed commits / keyless Sigstore / cosign
- Change Management — Protected branches, required reviews, status checks
- Vulnerability Management — Dependabot, CodeQL scheduling
- Incident Response Plan — Workflow-failure / compromise response
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- osac-project/osac-ai-skills★ 0same name
- tchughesiv/osac-ai-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- ai-development-governanceSkill
- ai-governanceSkill
- architecture-documentationSkill
- aws-security-architectureSkill
- behavioral-analysisSkill
- business-model-canvasSkill
- c4-architecture-documentationSkill
- code-quality-excellenceSkill
- compliance-frameworksSkill
- contribution-guidelinesSkill
- data-science-for-intelligenceSkill
- documentation-standardsSkill
- electoral-analysisSkill
- european-parliament-apiSkill
- european-political-systemSkill
- gdpr-complianceSkill
- github-agentic-workflowsSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- intelligence-analysis-techniquesSkill
- isms-complianceSkill
- legislative-monitoringSkill
- mcp-gateway-configurationSkill
- mcp-gateway-securitySkill
- mcp-server-developmentSkill
- open-source-governanceSkill
- osint-methodologiesSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- political-science-analysisSkill
- risk-assessment-frameworksSkill
- secrets-managementSkill
- secure-code-reviewSkill
- secure-development-lifecycleSkill
- security-by-designSkill
- seo-best-practicesSkill
- strategic-communication-analysisSkill
- testing-mcp-toolsSkill
- testing-strategySkill
- threat-modeling-frameworkSkill
- typescript-strict-patternsSkill
- vulnerability-managementSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

