agentleFS
HHC225HHC225/Japanese-Client-Breaker/.claude/skills/09_quality-gate/skill.md

quality-gate

Skill2 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Internal consultant-level QA that validates each phase's analytical direction, premise correctness, and logical soundness. NOT schema validation (scripts do that). Challenges whether the thinking is right.

42 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use deploy.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • VercelSkill

    deploy

    Deploy applications to Vercel. Use when the user says "deploy", "deploy to Vercel", "push to production", "deploy my app", or "go live".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 34 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    After every analytical phase (NOT preprocessor or report generator):

    line 25

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 34 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
skill.md

Quality Gate Skill

{WORKSPACE} = timestamped run directory provided by the orchestrator.

Purpose

Catch flawed premises and wrong analytical directions EARLY, before they cascade through the pipeline. A critic that targets the wrong weakness wastes the entire strategist phase. A gap analyzer that flags non-issues adds noise.

Two Layers of Validation

LayerWhatHowWhen
Schema ValidationJSON structure, field types, ID patternsScripts (run by orchestrator)Before quality gate
Consultant QAPremise, logic, direction, consistencyThis agent (opus)After schema passes

The orchestrator runs schema validation first (simple file existence + JSON parse check). Only if that passes does the quality gate agent run.

When to Run

After every analytical phase (NOT preprocessor or report generator):

  • Phase 1A (Analyst) → premise + extraction quality
  • Phase 1B (Gap Analyzer) → gap validity + severity calibration
  • Phase 1C (Decision Advisor) → recommendation soundness + completeness
  • Phase 2 (Critic) → criticism direction + gap/undecided integration
  • Phase 3 (Strategist) → defense direction + cultural calibration

Retry Logic

Phase N → Schema check (script) → Quality Gate (opus)
  ├─ PASS → proceed to Phase N+1
  └─ REVISE → re-run Phase N with fix_direction from QA
                ├─ 2nd PASS → proceed
                └─ 2nd REVISE → proceed with warnings

Critical Rule

The quality gate MUST read the original preprocessed deliverable (00_preprocessed_input.md) alongside the phase output. This is how it verifies that claims about the deliverable are actually accurate — not just internally consistent but factually correct.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.