android-e2e-verification
Skill2 starsChanged 40 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when a feature slice needs proof it works end-to-end on a device, or when closing the implement → run → assert loop for any UI-facing change. Maestro YAML flows turn acceptance criteria into executable checks that run against release builds locally, in CI, and via MCP from the agent.
- Pipes a download into a shell
- Installs packages
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- android-accessibilitySkill
- android-architectureSkill
- android-background-workSkill
- android-data-persistenceSkill
- android-device-testingSkill
- android-ui-engineeringSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- constraint-driven-developmentSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- debugging-and-error-recoverySkill
- deprecation-and-migrationSkill
- documentation-and-adrsSkill
- doubt-driven-developmentSkill
- git-workflow-and-versioningSkill
- idea-refineSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- interview-meSkill
- observability-and-instrumentationSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- security-and-hardeningSkill
- shipping-and-launchSkill
- source-driven-developmentSkill
- spec-driven-developmentSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- using-agent-skillsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 43
If Maestro is unavailable in the environment, say so explicitly and fall back to Compose/Espresso tests plus android screen capture …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Android E2E Verification (Maestro)
Overview
"It compiles and the unit tests pass" is not proof that a feature works. This skill closes the loop: every feature slice gets a Maestro flow — a YAML file of user actions and assertions derived from the spec's acceptance criteria — that runs black-box against the installed app. Implement, build, run the flow, watch it pass (or fix and re-run). The flow is committed next to the code, so the acceptance criterion stays executable forever.
Maestro drives the app over adb with no app-code changes, no test hooks, and no build instrumentation — it works on release builds and survives refactors that would break selector-heavy tests.
When to Use
- Completing any feature slice with a user-visible flow (see
incremental-implementation) - Turning a spec's acceptance criteria into executable checks (see
spec-driven-development) - Verifying a bug fix actually fixes the user-facing behavior, not just the unit under test
- Regression-protecting critical journeys (login, checkout, sync) in CI
- Smoke-testing release candidates before rollout (see
shipping-and-launch)
Skip when: The change has no runtime UI surface (pure data-layer refactor, build config) — unit/integration tests are the right layer. Don't use Maestro to test in-app logic permutations; that's what ViewModel and repository tests are for (see test-driven-development).
Core Process
Step 1: Install and Probe
- Install Maestro (single binary, Java 17+):
# Pin the version so CI and local runs agree
export MAESTRO_VERSION=2.6.1
curl -fsSL "https://get.maestro.mobile.dev" | bash
# or: brew install mobile-dev-inc/tap/maestro
maestro --version # probe availabilityIf Maestro is unavailable in the environment, say so explicitly and fall back to Compose/Espresso tests plus android screen capture verification — never silently skip E2E verification.
Step 2: Write the Flow From Acceptance Criteria — Before Implementing
- Translate each acceptance criterion into a flow under
.maestro/, named after the slice:
# .maestro/create-task.yaml
# Acceptance: "User can create a task and sees it in the list"
appId: com.example.tasks
---
- launchApp:
clearState: true
- tapOn: "Add task"
- inputText: "Buy groceries"
- tapOn: "Save"
- assertVisible: "Buy groceries"- Flow rules:
One flow per acceptance criterion; compose shared steps with
runFlow:- runFlow: subflows/login.yamlclearState: trueonlaunchAppfor deterministic starts- Assert on user-visible text or content descriptions — the same things a user sees
Wrap genuinely async steps in
retryblocks instead of sprinkling waits:- retry: maxRetries: 3 commands: - tapOn: "Sync" - assertVisible: "Synced"- Deterministic selectors first.
assertWithAI: "the task list shows one completed item"is allowed only where a selector cannot express the assertion (visual patterns, dynamic third-party content) — AI assertions cost more and can flake
Step 3: Run the Loop
- Implement → build/install → run → fix → re-run:
./gradlew installDebug # or: android run --apks=...
maestro test .maestro/create-task.yamlA failing flow is the signal to keep working; a passing flow is the tangible evidence the slice is done. Capture evidence for the PR when useful:
maestro record .maestro/create-task.yaml # video of the run- Agent-driven loop (MCP): when the harness supports MCP, run
maestro mcpto expose the device to the agent directly — the agent can tap, assert, and inspect live (Maestro Viewer) instead of shelling out per command. In headless/CI contexts, plainmaestro testis the fallback. For ad-hoc exploration without Maestro, useandroid screen capture --annotate+android screen resolve(see../../references/android-cli-reference.md).
Step 4: Wire Into CI
- Run flows in the emulator job (see
ci-cd-and-automation):
- name: E2E flows
uses: reactivecircus/android-emulator-runner@v2
with:
api-level: 36
arch: x86_64
script: |
./gradlew installDebug
maestro test .maestro/maestro test .maestro/ runs every committed flow — the acceptance criteria of all shipped slices become the regression suite. For device-farm scale, maestro cloud runs the same flows on hosted devices.
Step 5: Choose the Right E2E Layer
- Maestro is one layer, not the only one:
| Layer | Nature | Reach for it when |
| Compose/Espresso tests | White-box, in-process, Android-only | Screen logic, state permutations, fastest feedback |
| Maestro flows | Black-box YAML over adb, release builds | Acceptance criteria per slice, cross-screen journeys, CI regression |
Journeys (android CLI / Studio) | AI vision + natural language | Exploratory coverage where maintaining selectors isn't worth it |
Deterministic YAML sits between fully-scripted in-process tests and fully-AI Journeys: resilient like AI, repeatable like code.
Common Rationalizations
| Shortcut | Why It Fails |
| "The unit tests pass, the feature works" | Unit tests prove the pieces work in isolation. The user experiences the assembled flow — DI wiring, navigation, and manifest bugs live in the gaps. |
| "I'll write the flow after the feature is done" | Written after, the flow describes what you built, not what was asked. Written first, it's the acceptance criterion made executable. |
| "Maestro isn't installed, I'll just say it works" | "It works" without a run is an assertion, not evidence. Say the tool is unavailable and verify another way — never claim an unrun check. |
| "I'll use assertWithAI everywhere, it's easier" | AI assertions are slower, cost tokens, and can flake on ambiguity. Selectors are free and deterministic — AI is the escape hatch, not the default. |
| "E2E tests are flaky, not worth it" | Flakiness comes from timing hacks and shared state. clearState, retry blocks, and user-visible assertions make flows boringly stable. |
Red Flags
- A completed feature slice with no flow under
.maestro/ - Flows that only
launchAppand assert nothing assertWithAIused whereassertVisiblewould do- Sleep-style waits instead of
retryblocks - Flows passing locally but not wired into the CI emulator job
- "Verified manually" in a PR description with no recorded or committed flow
- Maestro testing logic permutations that belong in ViewModel unit tests
Verification
- Every acceptance criterion of the slice has a flow in
.maestro/ maestro test .maestro/<slice>.yamlpasses against the current build (paste the output)- Flows start from
clearState: true(or document why not) - Assertions target user-visible text/content descriptions
assertWithAIonly where a selector cannot express the assertion- CI runs
maestro test .maestro/in the emulator job - If Maestro was unavailable, the fallback verification used is stated explicitly
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

