create-pr
Skill4 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Create a pull request from the current branch with structured summary
- Commits and pushes
196 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- lohi-ai/babysittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- alexandrosandre/agentic-engineeringtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- alexandrosandre/alice-issue-agenttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- rccsousa/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- next-step/nextstep-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- blamechris/chroxytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use update-pr, act-on-feedback and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillupdate-pr
Update the pull request for the current session. Use when the user wants to push new changes to an existing PR.
Also in 9 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillact-on-feedback
Act on user feedback attached to the current session. Use when the user submits feedback on the session's changes via the Submit Feedback button.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ModelEngine-GroupSkillcreate-release-note
从 PR/commit 中自动生成结构化的 Release Notes,并可选创建 GitHub Draft Release。支持 x.y.0 版本合并前一 minor 系列的 release notes。当用户要求生成发布说明、创建 release notes 时触发。参数为版本号和可选的上一版本号。
Also in 3 projects that use this
frostneySkillnative-nostalgia-stack
Applies the user's FreePascal toolchain and its build, formatting, hook, and test contracts while leaving project-specific mechanics local. Use when scaffolding or working in a FreePascal project that follows this toolchain.
Also in 3 projects that use this
frostneySkillsoftware-engineering-excellence
Applies the user's engineering standards during substantial technical work: preserve scope, use current evidence, delegate independent parts, and complete authorized outcomes. Use during substantial implementation, debugging, refactoring, or multi-part delivery work.
Also in 3 projects that use this
parkchuSkillstart-mission
넥스트스텝(NextStep) 미션을 처음 시작할 때, 미션 저장소를 fork·clone하고 최초 작업 브랜치(step1 등)까지 만들어 준다. gh CLI로 fork하고 clone까지 이어서 처리하며, gh가 없거나 인증이 안 돼 있으면 브라우저 Fork 안내로 폴백한다. 이미 fork/clone돼 있으면 재사용하고 이어서 진행한다(재실행 안전). 사용자가 "미션 시작하려는데 저장소 세팅해줘", "새 미션 시작할래", "fork부터 해줘", "/nextstep:start-mission" 등으로 요청할 때 사용한다.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +1 more from microsoft
Other versions196 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 196
- microsoft/vscode★ 195ksame name
- vercel/next.js★ 143ksame name
- penpot/penpot★ 62ksame name
- remix-run/react-router★ 57ksame name
- moeru-ai/airi★ 51ksame name
- ToolJet/ToolJet★ 41ksame name
- ueberdosis/tiptap★ 39ksame name
- BabylonJS/Babylon.js★ 26ksame name
- kortix-ai/suna★ 21ksame name
- kortix-ai/CompanyOS★ 21ksame name
186 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- build-featureSkill
- councilSkill
- debugSkill
- guild-specializeSkill
- qa-cycleSkill
- re-specializeSkill
- tddSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 179 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 42
After completing a feature with /build-feature
- Distinctive: line 43
When you have changes on a feature branch ready for review
- Distinctive: line 55
Run git status to check for uncommitted changes -- if any, warn the user and ask whether to commit first
- Distinctive: line 56
Run git log main..HEAD --oneline to get the list of commits that will be in the PR
- Distinctive: line 57
If there are no commits ahead of main, report that there is nothing to PR
- Very specific: line 65
Test results: Run project tests (e.g., npm test) and capture pass/fail
- Very specific: line 66
Lint results: Run project lint (e.g., npm run lint) and capture pass/fail
- Distinctive: line 69
If tests or lint fail, warn the user but allow them to proceed (some PRs are draft/WIP).
- Very specific: line 91
Create the PR using gh pr create:
- Very specific: line 128
If the branch has wip: commits from build-feature checkpoints, consider squashing them before creating the PR
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 179 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Create PR
Creates a pull request from the current feature branch with a structured summary, test results, and change description. Closes the pipeline loop: init -> build-feature -> create-pr.
When to use
- After completing a feature with
/build-feature - When you have changes on a feature branch ready for review
- To create a well-structured PR without manual formatting
Usage
/create-pr
Process
Step 1 -- Verify branch state
- Confirm you are NOT on
mainordevelop-- refuse to create PR from default branches - Run
git statusto check for uncommitted changes -- if any, warn the user and ask whether to commit first - Run
git log main..HEAD --onelineto get the list of commits that will be in the PR - If there are no commits ahead of main, report that there is nothing to PR
Step 2 -- Gather context
Collect the information needed for the PR description:
- Commits:
git log main..HEAD --oneline-- list of all commits on this branch - Diff summary:
git diff main..HEAD --stat-- files changed with line counts - Test results: Run project tests (e.g.,
npm test) and capture pass/fail - Lint results: Run project lint (e.g.,
npm run lint) and capture pass/fail - Branch name: Extract feature name from the branch (e.g.,
feature/dark-mode->dark-mode)
If tests or lint fail, warn the user but allow them to proceed (some PRs are draft/WIP).
Step 3 -- Generate PR description
Build a structured PR description:
## Summary
[2-4 bullet points describing what this PR does, derived from commit messages]
## Changes
[File-level summary from git diff --stat]
## Test plan
- [x] Tests: [pass/fail] ([count] tests)
- [x] Lint: [pass/fail]
- [ ] [Any manual verification steps if applicable]Step 4 -- Create the PR
- Push the branch to origin:
git push -u origin [branch-name] - Create the PR using
gh pr create:- Title: derived from branch name or first commit message (max 70 chars)
- Body: the generated description from Step 3
- Base:
main(or the project's default branch)
- Report the PR URL to the user
Step 5 -- Post-creation
- Display the PR URL
- Suggest next steps:
- "Request review from a teammate"
- "Run
/code-reviewfor an AI code review" - "Merge when ready with
gh pr merge [number]"
Example Session
User: /create-pr
Checking branch state...
Branch: feature/dark-mode (4 commits ahead of main)
Tests: 82 passed, 0 failed
Lint: 0 errors
Creating PR...
PR #42: "feat: add dark mode toggle to settings"
https://github.com/org/repo/pull/42
Next steps:
- Request review from a teammate
- Run /code-review for AI code review
- Merge when readyNotes
- The PR title should be concise (under 70 characters) and follow conventional commits format when the project uses it
- If the branch has
wip:commits from build-feature checkpoints, consider squashing them before creating the PR - This skill does NOT merge the PR -- that is a manual step or a separate command
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

