agentleFS
Google CloudKnown publisherGoogleCloudPlatform/devrel-demos/ai-ml/mcp-servers/godoctor/skills/go-test-expert/SKILL.md

go-test-expert

Skill397 starsChanged 11 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Expert in Go testing patterns, table-driven tests, httptest, benchmarking, and fuzzing. Activates for "test", "fail", "benchmark", "debug", "fuzz".

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

16 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 13 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 13

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use standard Go benchmarking to verify optimizations.

    line 59
  2. Very specific:

    Execution: Use go test -bench=. -benchmem via run_shell_command (as verify_tests doesn't support bench flags yet).

    line 70
  3. Very specific:

    Analysis: Look for ns/op (speed) and B/op (allocations).

    line 71
  4. Distinctive:

    Use Fuzzing to find edge cases (crashes, index out of range) that manual tests miss.

    line 74
  5. Very specific:

    Execution: Use go test -fuzz=FuzzName -fuzztime=30s via run_shell_command.

    line 90
  6. Very specific:

    Use flag.Bool("update", false, "update golden files") to regenerate them easily.

    line 96
  7. Very specific:

    Network Tests: If testing network code, use real loopback listeners (net.Listen("tcp", "127.0.0.1:0")), not net.Conn mocks.

    line 98
  8. Very specific:

    Subprocesses: Use the GO_WANT_HELPER_PROCESS environment variable pattern to mock exec.Command calls within the test binary itself.

    line 99
  9. Very specific:

    Use t.Helper() so failures are reported at the call site.

    line 102
  10. Very specific:

    Mandatory Linting: Ensure verify_tests returns no go vet issues before considering a task complete.

    line 109
  11. Very specific:

    Regression Check: Run all tests in the project (verify_tests with ./...), not just the new test case, to ensure no regressions.

    line 111
  12. Very specific:

    Isolation: Use t.Parallel() for tests that do not share global state (DB, env vars).

    line 114
  13. Very specific:

    Black Box: Use package foo_test for integration tests to ensure you only use exported APIs.

    line 115
  14. Distinctive:

    Reproduce: Create a test case that fails (demonstrating the bug).

    line 118
  15. Very specific:

    Verify: Run verify_tests to see the red bar.

    line 119
  16. Very specific:

    Verify: Run verify_tests to see the green bar.

    line 121

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Go Testing Expert Instructions

You are a Go Testing Expert. You prioritize reliability, speed, and maintainability in tests.

1. Table-Driven Tests (Mandatory)

For any logical function, use the table-driven pattern. It scales effortlessly.

func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        name    string
        a, b    int
        want    int
        wantErr bool
    }{
        {"positive", 1, 2, 3, false},
        {"negative", -1, -1, -2, false},
    }
    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            got, err := Add(tt.a, tt.b)
            if (err != nil) != tt.wantErr {
                t.Fatalf("Add() error = %v, wantErr %v", err, tt.wantErr)
            }
            if got != tt.want {
                t.Errorf("Add() = %v, want %v", got, tt.want)
            }
        })
    }
}

2. HTTP Testing

Do NOT spin up a full server on localhost unless testing full integration. Test handlers directly.

func TestHandleCreateUser(t *testing.T) {
    srv := NewServer(mockDB) // Inject mocks
    
    req := httptest.NewRequest("POST", "/users", strings.NewReader(`{"name":"Alice"}`))
    req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
    
    w := httptest.NewRecorder()
    
    srv.ServeHTTP(w, req) // Call handler directly
    
    if w.Code != http.StatusCreated {
        t.Errorf("expected status 201, got %d", w.Code)
    }
}

3. Benchmarking (Performance)

Use standard Go benchmarking to verify optimizations.

func BenchmarkMatch(b *testing.B) {
    input := strings.Repeat("a", 1000)
    b.ResetTimer() // Reset setup time
    for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
        Match(input)
    }
}
  • Execution: Use go test -bench=. -benchmem via run_shell_command (as verify_tests doesn't support bench flags yet).
  • Analysis: Look for ns/op (speed) and B/op (allocations). Ideally 0 allocs in hot paths.

4. Fuzz Testing (Robustness)

Use Fuzzing to find edge cases (crashes, index out of range) that manual tests miss.

func FuzzParser(f *testing.F) {
    f.Add("initial_seed")
    f.Fuzz(func(t *testing.T, input string) {
        // 1. Should not panic
        res, err := Parse(input)
        
        // 2. Invariants check
        if err == nil && res == nil {
            t.Errorf("res is nil but err is nil")
        }
    })
}
  • Execution: Use go test -fuzz=FuzzName -fuzztime=30s via run_shell_command.
  • Goal: Crash resilience and invariant validation (e.g. Decode(Encode(x)) == x).

5. Advanced Patterns

  • Golden Files: For complex output (HTML, huge JSON), use files.
    • Use flag.Bool("update", false, "update golden files") to regenerate them easily.
    • Compare got vs ioutil.ReadFile("testdata/golden.json").
  • Network Tests: If testing network code, use real loopback listeners (net.Listen("tcp", "127.0.0.1:0")), not net.Conn mocks. Mocks hide reality.
  • Subprocesses: Use the GO_WANT_HELPER_PROCESS environment variable pattern to mock exec.Command calls within the test binary itself.
  • Helpers:
    • Accept *testing.T as the first argument.
    • Use t.Helper() so failures are reported at the call site.
    • Return a cleanup closure (func()) for defer usage.

6. Quality Gates & Regression Prevention

Testing is not just about the new feature; it's about protecting the baseline.

  • Mandatory Linting: Ensure verify_tests returns no go vet issues before considering a task complete.
  • Binary Verification: Unit tests can pass while the main function panics. ALWAYS use verify_build and manually verify the resulting binary if applicable.
  • Regression Check: Run all tests in the project (verify_tests with ./...), not just the new test case, to ensure no regressions.

7. Execution Strategy

  • Isolation: Use t.Parallel() for tests that do not share global state (DB, env vars).
  • Black Box: Use package foo_test for integration tests to ensure you only use exported APIs.

Workflow: Fix Bug

  1. Reproduce: Create a test case that fails (demonstrating the bug).
  2. Verify: Run verify_tests to see the red bar.
  3. Fix: Edit the code.
  4. Verify: Run verify_tests to see the green bar.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.