literature-search
Skill53 starsChanged 55 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Search and retrieve scientific literature — PubMed, preprint servers (arXiv, bioRxiv), and PubMed Central full text. Use when discovering what has been published on a topic, gene, compound, or disease, when establishing the volume and recency of literature for a target, when retrieving full-text articles, or when searching preprint servers for recent work. Do not use to verify that a specific citation exists (use citation-verification), to search cancer genomics databases (use oase cbioportal), or to assess whether a paper supports a claim.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Use this skill when you need to discover, search, or retrieve scientific literature.
- Very specific: line 70
Run oase doctor before first use.
- Very specific: line 82
Run search before analyze.
- Very specific: line 87
Use oase preprint search --source arxiv when looking for recent, not-yet-peer-reviewed work — preprints appear on arXiv days after …
- Very specific: line 103
All output options: --json for machine-readable output, --quiet for paths only, --out to override the default output directory.
- Very specific: line 146
Check mandatory_relays in the .pubmed-search.analysis.json.
- Very specific: line 158
High total with low retrieval: when total_found far exceeds n_retrieved, the summary statistics describe a small sample.
- Very specific: line 198
Generalising from a small retrieval of a large result set: If total_found is 5000 and n_retrieved is 20, the year distribution and journal …
- Distinctive: line 231
When you need more than 100 results (BigQuery supports up to 1000).
- Distinctive: line 232
When you need date-range or journal-level filtering in the query itself, rather than post-hoc filtering of a small result set.
- Distinctive: line 234
When the query benefits from SQL substring matching across titles and abstracts simultaneously.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
1. When to use, and when not
Use this skill when you need to discover, search, or retrieve scientific literature. Entry points include:
- Finding publications related to a gene, pathway, compound, or disease as part of target validation or literature review.
- Establishing the volume and recency of research activity for a gene or topic — a gene with hundreds of recent publications has a different evidence base than one with three papers from 2008.
- Identifying the dominant journals and MeSH terms for a research area to refine subsequent searches.
- Checking whether a claimed literature consensus exists — does the published record support the assertion that "multiple studies have shown X"?
- Retrieving the full text of a PubMed Central article for detailed analysis or citation extraction.
- Searching preprint servers for recent, not-yet-peer-reviewed work.
Do not use when:
- You need to verify that a specific PMID, DOI, or NCT number resolves
to a real record →
citation-verification. - You need cancer genomics study data →
oase cbioportal search. - You need to count how many papers support a specific claim — a keyword search counts matches, not evidence.
Question-type routing
| Question type | Command | Skill |
| What has been published on a topic? | oase pubmed search | this skill |
| What does the result set look like? | oase pubmed analyze | this skill |
| Fetch full text of a PMC article | oase pubmed fulltext | this skill |
| Find recent preprints (physics, CS, math) | oase preprint search --source arxiv | this skill |
| Find recent preprints (biology, life sciences) | oase preprint search --source biorxiv | this skill |
| Verify a citation (PMID, DOI, NCT) exists | oase cite verify | citation-verification |
| Resolve a literature identifier | oase litref resolve | citation-resolution |
| Find cancer genomics studies | oase cbioportal search | (genomics) |
2. Preconditions
- Query input: a PubMed search string. Supports PubMed syntax:
keywords, MeSH terms, Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT), and field
tags ([Title], [Author], etc.).
oase pubmed search --helpfor details. - No authentication needed — NCBI E-utilities are public.
- Rate limiting: NCBI allows 3 requests/sec without an API key. The CLI paces requests.
- Result limit:
--max-resultscontrols retrieval (1-100, default 20). PubMed reportstotal_foundeven when only a subset is retrieved. - Non-exhaustive by design: a keyword search cannot find papers
that use different terminology, are indexed under different MeSH
headings, or are not yet indexed. The
search_not_exhaustiverelay carries this caveat. - Run
oase doctorbefore first use.
3. Tool invocations
| Question | Run | Writes to |
| What has been published on this topic? | oase pubmed search <QUERY> [--max-results N] [--sort relevance|date] | raw/literature/<slug>.esearch.json<br>raw/literature/<slug>.efetch.xml<br>raw/literature/<slug>.pubmed-search.json<br>raw/literature/<slug>.meta.json |
| What does the result set look like? | oase pubmed analyze <QUERY> | raw/literature/<slug>.pubmed-search.analysis.json |
| Fetch full text of a PMC article | oase pubmed fulltext <PMCID> | raw/literature/<pmcid>.fulltext.json |
| Find preprints on a topic (arXiv) | oase preprint search --source arxiv <QUERY> | raw/literature/<slug>.preprint-search.json |
| Find bioRxiv preprints on a topic | oase preprint search --source biorxiv <QUERY> | raw/literature/<slug>.preprint-search.json |
Run search before analyze. analyze reads from disk and produces
summary statistics without network access.
When to prefer preprint over pubmed
Use oase preprint search --source arxiv when looking for recent,
not-yet-peer-reviewed work — preprints appear on arXiv days after
submission, whereas PubMed indexes peer-reviewed publications which
may lag months behind. Use oase preprint search --source biorxiv
when looking for recent biology and life-sciences preprints — bioRxiv
covers wet-lab biology, genomics, neuroscience, and related fields
that arXiv does not. Use oase pubmed search when looking for
peer-reviewed literature with MeSH indexing, journal provenance, and
the quality signal that peer review provides.
The <slug> is derived from the query string (filesystem-safe,
lowercase, max 80 characters). The .pubmed-search.json is the
structured artifact with parsed article records (PMID, title, authors,
journal, year, abstract, DOI, MeSH terms). The .efetch.xml is the
verbatim PubMed XML response.
All output options: --json for machine-readable output, --quiet for
paths only, --out to override the default output directory.
4. Interpretation contract
Verdicts
analyze produces:
- results_found — the query matched one or more PubMed records.
The analysis reports
total_found(PubMed's count),n_retrieved(the subset fetched), year distribution, top journals, and top MeSH terms. - no_results — the query matched nothing in PubMed.
What the analysis reports
The analysis provides summary statistics, not scientific conclusions:
- Year distribution: publication counts per year. Useful for assessing research recency and trajectory — a gene with 50 publications in 2020-2024 and 2 before 2015 has a different evidence landscape than one with steady output since the 1990s.
- Top journals: most frequent journals in the result set. Indicates the research field (oncology, neuroscience, etc.) and the level of the venues.
- Top MeSH terms: most frequent Medical Subject Headings. These are NLM's controlled vocabulary — useful for refining subsequent searches or identifying the dominant research themes.
The retrieval-vs-total gap
total_found may be much larger than n_retrieved (capped by
--max-results). The summary statistics describe the retrieved subset,
not the full result set. State this: "of N total PubMed results, M were
retrieved and summarised."
Mandatory relays
| Relay code | Kind | Fires when | Obligation |
pubmed.search_not_exhaustive | Qualifier | Results were found (conditional) | State that the search is a keyword-based sample, not a comprehensive literature survey. Relevant publications may use different terminology, be indexed under different MeSH headings, or not yet be indexed. Do not present search results as a complete survey of the topic. |
Check mandatory_relays in the .pubmed-search.analysis.json. Every
relay code present must be satisfied in the finding.
Consequence rules
- Results found: report the total count, the number retrieved, the
year range, and the top journals and MeSH terms. Carry the
search_not_exhaustivequalifier. The result set is a sample, not a census. - No results: report as "no PubMed results for this query." This may indicate an overly specific query, unusual terminology, or a genuinely unpublished topic. Suggest query refinement if appropriate.
- High total with low retrieval: when
total_foundfar exceedsn_retrieved, the summary statistics describe a small sample. State the gap; do not generalise from a 20-article sample of 5000 results.
Cross-disciplinary consequences
- Publication volume and recency inform the evidence landscape for a target but do not constitute evidence for or against the target itself. A well-published gene is not necessarily a good target; an unpublished one is not necessarily a bad one.
- MeSH terms from the result set can identify disease areas and biological processes associated with the target, useful for indication selection.
- Individual articles in the result set may warrant citation
verification (use
citation-resolution) before being cited in a finding.
What this section produces
Following this contract produces a Layer 1 finding in findings/ that
cites the .pubmed-search.analysis.json, satisfies the
search_not_exhaustive relay, reports the retrieval-vs-total gap, and
does not present keyword results as a comprehensive survey. Everything
the tools emitted stays under raw/literature/.
5. Failure modes and anti-fabrication guard
Do not compute these values yourself. The value is whatever the tool emitted. If the tool did not run, there is no value. If a required tool is unavailable, report the task as blocked. Do not estimate, and do not proceed on an assumed result.
Named pathologies
- Presenting search results as a complete literature survey. A
PubMed keyword search is inherently non-exhaustive. The
search_not_exhaustiverelay exists because this is the first qualifier lost when results are summarised. "The literature shows X" is unsupported by a keyword search; "N PubMed results for query Q include..." is supported. - Generalising from a small retrieval of a large result set. If
total_foundis 5000 andn_retrievedis 20, the year distribution and journal distribution describe 20 papers, not 5000. State the sample size. - Citing individual papers from the result set without verification.
The search returns metadata (title, authors, abstract). It does not
verify that each paper says what the title suggests, or that the DOI
resolves. Use
citation-resolutionbefore citing a specific paper from the results. - Treating zero results as evidence of absence. Zero results may reflect an overly specific query, non-standard terminology, or indexing lag. It does not prove nothing has been published on the topic.
- Counting results as evidence strength. "50 papers mention gene X and disease Y" is a search statistic, not evidence that gene X causes disease Y. Publication count measures research interest, not scientific validity.
- Confusing the query slug with the query. The filesystem slug is a
truncated, sanitised version of the query string. When citing the
search, cite the original query from the artifact's
query.termsfield, not the slug.
6. PubMed via BigQuery (oase pubmed-bq)
In addition to the NCBI E-utilities path (oase pubmed), this skill
covers oase pubmed-bq, which queries the PubMed dataset hosted on
Google BigQuery. BigQuery enables SQL-based filtering with larger
result sets, date range filters, and journal filters.
When to prefer pubmed-bq over pubmed
- When you need more than 100 results (BigQuery supports up to 1000).
- When you need date-range or journal-level filtering in the query itself, rather than post-hoc filtering of a small result set.
- When the query benefits from SQL substring matching across titles and abstracts simultaneously.
Preconditions
- Authentication: requires Google Cloud Application Default
Credentials (
gcloud auth application-default loginorGOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS). - Dataset: defaults to
bigquery-public-data.nih_nlm.pubmed. Override with--bq-datasetor$OASE_PUBMED_BQ_DATASET. - Dependency:
google-cloud-bigquery>=3.0must be installed.
Tool invocations
| Question | Run | Writes to |
| Search PubMed via BigQuery | oase pubmed-bq search <QUERY> [--max-results N] [--year-from Y] [--year-to Y] [--journal J] [--bq-dataset D] | raw/literature/<slug>.pubmed-bq.json<br>raw/literature/<slug>.pubmed-bq.meta.json |
| Summarise BigQuery results | oase pubmed-bq analyze <QUERY> | raw/literature/<slug>.pubmed-bq.analysis.json |
Run search before analyze. analyze reads from disk and produces
summary statistics (year distribution, journal distribution, abstract
keyword frequency) without network access.
Mandatory relays
| Relay code | Kind | Fires when | Obligation |
pubmed_bq.search_not_exhaustive | Qualifier | Results were found (conditional) | State that the search uses SQL substring matching, which may miss publications using different terminology, alternate spellings, or synonyms. Do not present results as a complete literature survey. |
Interpretation
The same interpretation contract from oase pubmed (section 4) applies:
results are a keyword-based sample, not a comprehensive survey. The
search_not_exhaustive relay must be satisfied. The retrieval-vs-total
gap applies here as well — --max-results caps the retrieval.
7. Related genomics commands
For cancer genomics data, use oase cbioportal search and
oase cbioportal analyze. cBioPortal aggregates genomic data from
large-scale cancer studies (TCGA, AACR GENIE, institutional cohorts).
Artifacts land under raw/expression/.
| Question | Run | Writes to |
| What cancer genomics studies match a query? | oase cbioportal search <QUERY> [--cancer-type T] [--study S] [--max-results N] | raw/expression/<slug>.cbioportal-search.json<br>raw/expression/<slug>.cbioportal.meta.json |
| What do the cBioPortal results show? | oase cbioportal analyze <ARTIFACT> | raw/expression/<slug>.cbioportal-search.analysis.json |
cBioPortal is a cancer genomics resource, not a literature database. Results are study-level metadata (study ID, name, cancer type, sample count), not mutation data or expression profiles.
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- terravic/pde-agent-plugin★ 090% same
Wrote their own version · 16
- aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw★ 15ksame name
- wu-yc/LabClaw★ 1.1ksame name
- lingzhi227/agent-research-skills★ 350same name
- jxtse/scientific-research-skills★ 68same name
- ssinder/bioinformatics-agent-skills★ 67same name
- yorkeccak/scientific-skills★ 62same name
- xjtulyc/awesome-rosetta-skills★ 34same name
- AI-ModCon/genesis-skills★ 30same name
- qiaomiaojoe/ai-academic-workflow★ 9same name
- KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude★ 5same name
6 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository82 other files it gives its agents.
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/admet-dmpk-scientist/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/bootstrapper/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/computational-biologist/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/computational-chemist/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/experimental-biologist/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/finding-validator/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/head-of-discovery/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/hypex-evolution/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/hypex-generation/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/hypex-meta-review/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/hypex-proximity/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/hypex-reflection/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/hypex-supervisor/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/hypex-tournament/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/medicinal-chemist/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/preclinical-toxicologist/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/project-curator/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/regulatory-scientist/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/research-operations-controller/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/science-program-lead/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/scientific-reviewer/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- applications/open-agentic-science-engine/templates/structural-biologist/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- cost-estimationSkill
- database-queriesSkill
- job-managementSkill
- job-submissionSkill
- results-analysisSkill
- storage-managementSkill
- visualizationSkill
- admet-property-predictionSkill
- artifact-conventionsSkill
- binding-mode-analysisSkill
- bioactivity-landscapeSkill
- brain-atlasSkill
- citation-resolutionSkill
- citation-verificationSkill
- competitive-differentiationSkill
- compound-identity-resolutionSkill
- compound-property-profileSkill
- debate-protocolSkill
- disease-transcriptomicsSkill
- elo-tournamentSkill
- evolution-operatorsSkill
- hypex-tool-setupSkill
- hypothesis-entrySkill
- hypothesis-run-corpusSkill
- hypothesis-schemaSkill
- in-vivo-pk-analysisSkill
- manufacturing-feasibilitySkill
- meta-review-protocolSkill
- model-organism-phenotypeSkill
- pocket-druggabilitySkill
- preclinical-safety-assessmentSkill
- program-state-managementSkill
- protein-structure-confidenceSkill
- proximity-protocolSkill
- regulatory-variant-effectSkill
- review-rubricSkill
- run-protocolSkill
- safety-screenSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

