agentflow-os
Skill1 starsChanged 51 days agoMITView on GitHub
Compatibility entry for MakeCrew, an adaptive AI work framework that clarifies vague requests, matches installed Skills and methods, routes work to the right Agent, preserves project memory, verifies delivery, controls cost, and learns from evidence.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- llms.txtllms.txt
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- checkpoint-recoverySkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- debugging-and-error-recoverySkill
- frontend-ui-engineeringSkill
- git-workflow-and-versioningSkill
- interview-meSkill
- makecrewSkill
- parallel-dispatchSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- product-deliverySkill
- review-and-critiqueSkill
- self-evolutionSkill
- shipping-and-launchSkill
- skill-auditSkill
- source-driven-developmentSkill
- task-intakeSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 28
Keep one clear task in the current conversation.
- Very specific: line 37
After installation or first activation, immediately tell the user in plain language that MakeCrew is ready and explain the three ways to …
- Distinctive: line 64
Use CEO/PM scheduling only when the user submits multiple tasks, asks for parallel work, or needs cross-project resource decisions.
- Distinctive: line 79
Never carry the full transcript into the new CEO thread.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AgentFlow OS Compatibility Entry
This legacy Skill ID delegates to MakeCrew. Use it when a user wants AI to clarify an underspecified task, discover
the best available Skill or method, route work to one or more Agents, preserve
project memory, enforce verification, resume interrupted work, or improve from
feedback. Search aliases: MakeCrew, AI Company OS, AI work operating
system, multi-agent orchestration, agent routing, and Skill discovery.
The compatibility entry also uses MakeCrew's local method catalog after a task
is clear. It can match source-first research, theory/case/counterexample
research, transferable benchmark selection, content asset maps, two-layer
pre-publication review, knowledge-base navigation/incremental auditing,
design checks, and Skill trigger contracts. Each card exposes a stable ID,
use signals, boundaries, deliverables, acceptance evidence, cost, and source
level. Cards are ranked by task signals with explicit match reasons; the display
window is bounded while the adapter reports the total external result count.
See docs/method-catalog.md; method cards are optional planning aids and do not
install Skills, create employees, or scan all files. Use makecrew method-audit
before a catalog release; malformed host entries are skipped and counted.
Default path
Keep one clear task in the current conversation. Ask only the missing questions that change the deliverable (0-N total, 1-3 per round), then inspect installed Skill metadata and local methods. Use local matches directly. Search external candidates only for unresolved capability gaps or a requested fresh comparison; show purpose, source, license, and trade-offs before the user chooses whether to install or use one.
Post-install welcome
After installation or first activation, immediately tell the user in plain language that MakeCrew is ready and explain the three ways to use it: lightweight current-conversation mode, approved basic-team mode, and on-demand employee mode. Mention that existing conversations and project memory are kept, that a single clear task stays in the current conversation, and that missing employees are proposed with reasons before creation. Show this welcome once per workspace and do not send recurring daily notices.
Employee creation gate
A fresh install loads role templates but creates no employee conversations.
Existing ordinary conversations, employees, project memory, and configuration
remain untouched. When no suitable employee exists, return an
employee_proposals list with:
- reason and responsibilities;
- required Skills and tools;
- memory scope;
- estimated Token/time cost;
- workspace and conversation impact.
Set status to awaiting_employee_approval. Create or bind an employee
conversation only after explicit user approval. CEO-001, PM-001, and
QA-001 are optional templates; a single task does not require a CEO.
Multi-task path
Use CEO/PM scheduling only when the user submits multiple tasks, asks for parallel work, or needs cross-project resource decisions. Reuse an approved employee thread for the same project; propose missing roles first, then dispatch independent tasks with explicit dependencies, budgets, and one QA summary.
On Codex, use the bundled CodexAdapter to map the parent Agent to the
supervisor and native child Agents to employees. Host callbacks create/reuse
threads, send compact packets, and return structured results; missing callbacks
remain explicitly queued.
The CEO-001 role may rotate across host threads. At 85% context usage prepare
a compact handoff; at 95% complete it before complex work. The phrase
给 CEO 换一个新对话 triggers the same flow. Use CeoContinuityManager and
CodexAdapter.rollover_ceo() so the candidate verifies active project, task,
decision, high-risk IDs, and the handoff digest before the active pointer moves.
Never carry the full transcript into the new CEO thread.
P0 quality and recovery
The compatibility entry also exposes three optional contracts from MakeCrew:
skill-audit validates Skill metadata and progressive-disclosure layout;
review-and-critique supplies milestone and pre-release independent review;
checkpoint-recovery persists compact, idempotent node state and bounded retry
decisions. Add them only when the task needs those guarantees, keeping ordinary
single-task work on the shortest path.
Verification and learning
Return the route, employee IDs, selected Skills/tools, project context, acceptance gates, budget, evidence, blockers, and next action. Do not claim a host-side action without execution evidence. Trigger self-evolution only after negative feedback, failed verification, rework, repeated issues, or an explicit retrospective; replay a candidate against a baseline before adoption.
Compatibility
The legacy Skill path skills/makecrew/SKILL.md, Skill ID makecrew, command
makecrew, Python module ai_company_os, and workspace directory .makecrew
remain supported.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

