tech-rust
Skill1 starsChanged 28 days agoMITView on GitHub
Technology skill loaded when writing systems or backend code in Rust.
In this repository29 other files it gives its agents.
- exec-accessibilitySkill
- exec-architectureSkill
- exec-code-reviewSkill
- exec-debuggingSkill
- exec-documentationSkill
- exec-performanceSkill
- exec-refactoringSkill
- exec-repo-patternsSkill
- exec-securitySkill
- exec-testingSkill
- exec-ui-uxSkill
- exec-verificationSkill
- tech-dockerSkill
- tech-flutterSkill
- tech-goSkill
- tech-graphqlSkill
- tech-kotlinSkill
- tech-nextjsSkill
- tech-nodeSkill
- tech-postgresSkill
- tech-pythonSkill
- tech-reactSkill
- tech-swiftSkill
- tech-tailwindSkill
- tech-typescriptSkill
- tech-vueSkill
- linear-spanks-gitSkill
- linear-spanksSkill
- linear-workflowSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
When writing Rust, prioritize memory safety, zero-cost abstractions, and idiomatic error handling:
- Very specific: line 14
Error Handling: Never use unwrap() or expect() in production code.
- Very specific: line 15
Pattern Matching: Use exhaustive match statements instead of long if/else chains, especially when dealing with Option and Result types.
- Very specific: line 16
Iterators: Prefer iterator methods (.map(), .filter(), .fold()) over manual for loops where possible for conciseness and optimization.
- Very specific: line 17
Clippy: Ensure code passes cargo clippy without warnings.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Rust Best Practices
Apply this skill after inspecting repository conventions and supported versions. Treat its rules as defaults unless they protect a concrete safety property; preserve an established project pattern when it conflicts, and record the reason in the implementation plan.
When writing Rust, prioritize memory safety, zero-cost abstractions, and idiomatic error handling:
- Ownership & Borrowing: Minimize cloning (
.clone()). Prefer passing references (&Tor&mut T) and structure your data to satisfy the borrow checker naturally. - Error Handling: Never use
unwrap()orexpect()in production code. Propagate errors using the?operator and returnResult<T, E>. - Pattern Matching: Use exhaustive
matchstatements instead of longif/elsechains, especially when dealing withOptionandResulttypes. - Iterators: Prefer iterator methods (
.map(),.filter(),.fold()) over manualforloops where possible for conciseness and optimization. - Clippy: Ensure code passes
cargo clippywithout warnings. Adhere strictly to the linter's idiomatic suggestions.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

