agentleFS
GeiserXGeiserX/agent-skills/skills/review-code/SKILL.md

review-code

Skill5 starsChanged 5 days agoGPL-3.0View on GitHub

Audits a whole codebase in bounded waves of independent parallel auditors, publishes every verified finding ranked by severity, and applies only safe, in-scope repairs. Use when invoked explicitly for a codebase health review.

69 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use audit-test-suite, change-data-safely and 4 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • yaohuangguanSkill

    audit-test-suite

    Find where an existing test suite is weak and decide what to test next, ranked by risk. Use this when asked to add missing tests, find gaps, raise coverage, assess test quality or see which areas are thin, even if the request only mentions a coverage percentage.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • yaohuangguanSkill

    change-data-safely

    Change a database schema or stored data without breaking running code or losing data. Use this for any migration, new or changed column, backfill, bulk update, delete, index, or change to a stored format, including in small projects. Data mistakes are often impossible to undo.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • mrdulasolutionsSkill

    clear-caches

    Clear extension caches, analysis data, and drafts from the database. Use when testing sender lookups, analysis, or draft generation from a clean state.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • mrdulasolutionsSkill

    electron-devtools-testing

    Test the Electron app interactively using Chrome DevTools Protocol. Use when the user asks to test, verify, or interact with the running app via browser automation.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +1 more from mrdulasolutions
  • +1 more from yaohuangguan

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 56 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

Licensed with conditions — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 56 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.