commit-style
Skill1 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
This skill enforces Conventional Commits with high-quality commit messages and anti-pattern detection. Flag these when reviewing commit history or helping write commits:
10 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jskswamy/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ghvinashvili/specagenttheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jars-demo/jars-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- redis/go-redistheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- sherifattia/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 12, 2026
- caikiji/skills-labtheir own version, first seen Sep 7, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use release.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillrelease
Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks to cut/publish a Huabu desktop release or tag a version. Performs an outward action — bumps the version in apps/desktop/package.json, commits + annotated-tags vX.Y.Z, and pushes the branch + tag. That tag push auto-builds the macOS/Windows installers and publishes a GitHub Release. Provides `status`, `bump`, `tag-push`, and a one-command `run` (bump → tag-push).
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 10
- redis/go-redis★ 22ksame name
- ghvinashvili/specagent★ 7same name
- caikiji/skills-lab★ 4same name
- jskswamy/skills★ 3same name
- karashiiro/agent-skills★ 2same name
- mimoccc/my-claude-skills★ 1same name
- sherifattia/skills★ 1same name
- jars-demo/jars-skills★ 0same name
- sudokoi/skills★ 0same name
- TheophilusChinomona/idev★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adr-writerSkill
- data-contractsSkill
- sql-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 33
No period at the end of subject line
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Commit Style Skill
This skill enforces Conventional Commits with high-quality commit messages and anti-pattern detection.
Conventional Commits Format
<type>(<scope>): <short description>
[optional body]
[optional footer]Types
| Type | When to use |
feat | New feature for the user |
fix | Bug fix for the user |
refactor | Code change that is neither a fix nor a feature |
perf | Performance improvement |
test | Adding or correcting tests |
docs | Documentation changes only |
chore | Build process, tooling, dependency updates |
ci | CI/CD configuration changes |
revert | Revert a previous commit |
Rules
- Subject line ≤ 72 characters
- Imperative mood in subject: "add feature" not "added feature" or "adds feature"
- No period at the end of subject line
- Scope is optional but recommended: the module, component, or layer changed
- Body explains why, not what — the diff shows what
- Breaking changes: add
!after type/scope ANDBREAKING CHANGE:footer
Good vs Bad Examples
Good commits
feat(auth): add OAuth2 PKCE flow for mobile clients
PKCE is required for public clients that cannot store a client secret.
The previous implicit flow was deprecated in RFC 8252.
Closes #142fix(pipeline): handle null values in user_id join key
Spark's default inner join silently drops rows with null keys.
Changed to LEFT JOIN with explicit null filter and quarantine step.refactor(orders): extract tax calculation to dedicated service
Tax logic was duplicated in 3 places and had diverged. Now a single
TaxCalculationService is the source of truth.perf(query): add composite index on (tenant_id, created_at)
Query planner was doing a full scan on the events table (12M rows).
EXPLAIN ANALYZE confirmed this index reduces the scan to 1.2k rows.Bad commits (and why)
# BAD — no type, no scope, vague
fix stuff
# BAD — describes what, not why
add index to events table
# BAD — past tense
added OAuth flow
# BAD — too long, non-imperative, no type
I updated the authentication module to support the new OAuth2 PKCE flow as required by mobile clients
# BAD — redundant comment in commit body
# Changed tax calculation
tax_amount = price * rate # calculate taxDetecting Bad Commit Patterns
Flag these when reviewing commit history or helping write commits:
- Commits that mention specific line numbers ("fix line 42")
- Commits that reference internal variable names ("rename
tmptodata") - Commits with "WIP", "temp", "fix", "update", "changes" as the entire message
- Commits that mix multiple unrelated changes
- Commits that include debug code, commented-out code, or
print()statements
Breaking Change Example
feat(api)!: remove /v1/users/search endpoint
BREAKING CHANGE: /v1/users/search is removed. Use /v2/users?q= instead.
The v1 endpoint was deprecated in 0.8.0 and is incompatible with the
new search infrastructure.
Migration guide: docs/migrations/v1-v2-search.mdDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

