agentleFS
FuDesign2008FuDesign2008/open-skills/skills/git-commit/SKILL.md

git-commit

Skill6 starsChanged 6 days agoMITView on GitHub

Git commit unified entry point. Triggers when user says 「提交代码」「git commit」「帮我提交」「写 commit message」「生成 commit」「提交一下」「git-commit」「自动提交代码」「git-commit-auto」 (commit code / help me commit / write commit message / generate commit / auto commit), or when invoked by jira-fix-workflow phase 7.

  • Commits and pushes

174 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use git-pr, github-pr-create and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • klauswgSkill

    git-pr

    Prepare, review, publish, or update a complete GitHub pull request for the current repository, including local commit readiness, safe push strategy, semantic title validation, repository-native PR templates, issue linking, and checks verification. Use when the user asks to draft, create, submit, publish, open, or update a pull request. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final PR before any push or GitHub write.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • mjun0812Skill

    github-pr-create

    Pull Requestを作成するSkill。現在のbranchからpull requestを作成する。言語指定可能。 ユーザーが「PR作って」「pull request作成して」のように依頼したら使うこと。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    git-branch

    Branch management for implementation. Use when you need to create a branch, switch branches, checkout, or verify branching strategy before implementing code. Do not use for commits (use git-commit), pull requests (use pull-request), or advanced git operations (rebase, merge).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • klauswgSkill

    git-issue

    Prepare, review, create, or update evidence-based GitHub issues for the current repository with duplicate detection, repository-native templates, valid labels, and post-publication verification. Use when the user asks to draft, file, submit, publish, edit, or refine a GitHub issue, bug report, feature request, performance issue, or technical proposal. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final issue before any GitHub write.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • gologo13Skill

    git-push

    Push current branch to origin and sync with remote updates; keywords: git, rebase. Use only on explicit request; before execution, review diffs and list impact scope.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    github-pr-review

    Review a GitHub pull request and leave inline comments in a natural human reviewing voice, indistinguishable from comments typed by hand on the GitHub web UI. Deliberately bounded to defects a reader can settle by looking at the anchored line, rather than a deep audit, so every comment is cheap for the author to check. Scales to 2-20 comments by PR size, parallelises analysis across sub-agents, drafts for approval, then posts individually with human pacing. Use when the user says "review this PR", "review PR 123", pastes a github.com/.../pull/N link, or asks for comments on a pull request. Don't use for reviewing local uncommitted changes or a diff against a branch (use the `review` skill for that).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 134 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Commit message contains only the title line, no body

    line 55

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 134 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Git Commit — Unified Entry (Auto Mode by Default)

Mode Detection Rules

SignalResult
Caller passes execute=true, or triggered by jira-fix-workflow phase 7Auto mode
User says 「手动提交」「只生成命令」「不要执行」「给我命令」 (manual commit / only generate command / don't execute / give me the command)Manual mode
Other triggers or unclear contextDefault to auto mode

Execution Flow

Step 1: Collect Commit Info

Fields for the commit message:

  • type: fix, feat, refactor, perf, style, docs, test
  • scope (optional): ai-summary, share, auth, api, ui, core
  • subject: brief description in the user's preferred language, max 50 chars
  • jira_id (optional): e.g. PROJ-123

(jira_id is optional; other context fields like branch, report_path are passed by the caller and not written into the commit)

Step 2: Determine Execution Mode

Decide execute=false (manual) or execute=true (auto). See "Mode Detection Rules" above.

Step 3: Multi-Project Detection

Scan rules:

  • Scan scope: first and second-level subdirectories of the workspace root
  • Identification: presence of a .git directory
  • Exclude: node_modules, .cursor, dist, build, .git, hidden directories (starting with .)
  • For each candidate directory, run git status to verify validity

Multi-project scenario: Report files are committed only in the primary project (the first one); each project with changes gets its own commit message.

Step 4: Generate Commit Message

Format:

<type>(<scope>): <Jira-ID> <subject>

Rules:

  • Subject: max 50 chars, in the user's preferred language, must include a verb matching the type (e.g. feat: 新增/Add, fix: 修复/Fix, refactor: 重构/Refactor, perf: 优化/Optimize, style: 格式化/Format, docs: 文档/Docs, test: 测试/Test)
  • Jira ID goes before the subject when present
  • Omit parentheses when no scope: <type>: <subject>
  • Commit message contains only the title line, no body

Step 5: Execute Git Operations

Manual mode (execute=false): Generate commands, don't execute, prompt user to run manually.

Auto mode (execute=true): Execute the following commands in order, outputting each command's result or status:

  1. git status — output current changes summary
  2. Protected branch check — committing directly to main/master/develop bypasses code review; unreviewed production code lands on main. Warn the user if detected
  3. git add . — output staged file status
  4. git commit -m "..." — output commit hash and message
  5. git log -1 --stat — output commit stats (changed files and line counts)
  6. git push -u origin [branch-name] — output push result or branch tracking info

For multi-project, execute these steps independently for each project, with a summary table at the end.

Output Format

Auto mode (default):

## Git Commit (Auto Mode)

**Project**: backend   **Branch**: fix/PROJ-123
**Commit**: a1b2c3d  **Push**: ✅ Success
**Changes**: +45/-12 (3 files)

**Next**: Create PR → Code Review → Test Verification

Manual mode (on explicit request):

## Git Commit (Manual Mode)

**Generated Commit Message**:
fix(ai-summary): PROJ-123 修复分享链接中AI摘要按钮显示问题

**Commands**:
git status
git add .
git commit -m "fix(ai-summary): PROJ-123 修复分享链接中AI摘要按钮显示问题"
git log -1 --stat
git push -u origin [branch-name]  # optional

**Note**: Please review and execute the above commands manually.

For multi-project, output independently for each project, with a summary table at the end.

Error Handling

ScenarioHandling
No uncommitted changesManual mode: inform user nothing to commit; Auto mode: output "No changes to commit" or run git add . then show "Staging area empty"
Branch doesn't existError out, suggest creating a branch first
Git operation failsShow error, provide fallback (suggest "manual commit" to retry)
Not in a Git repoError out and terminate, suggest checking the directory
Multi-project detection failsFallback to single-project mode using the current directory

Safety Mechanisms (Auto Mode)

  • Warn when changes exceed 10 files / 500 lines; warn again at 20 files / 1000 lines (warnings don't block); failure in one project doesn't affect others

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.