deep-risk-analysis
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Clause-by-clause contract risk analysis with severity scoring, financial exposure estimates, and prioritized remediation guidance
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- html-pptSkill
- legal-agreementSkill
- contract-comparisonSkill
- legal-complianceSkill
- legal-freelancerSkill
- missing-protections-finderSkill
- custom-nda-generatorSkill
- counter-proposal-generatorSkill
- plain-english-translationSkill
- legal-privacySkill
- legal-report-pdfSkill
- legal-reviewSkill
- legalSkill
- terms-of-service-generatorSkill
- req-evalSkill
- word-docSkill
- xiaohongshuSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
If a file path is provided, read it using the Read tool.
- Distinctive: line 20
If a URL is provided, fetch it using WebFetch.
- Distinctive: line 21
If the text is pasted inline, use it directly.
- Distinctive: line 55
Survival clauses: Check which obligations survive termination and for how long.
- Distinctive: line 64
Risk indicator: Use the appropriate emoji:
- Distinctive: line 70
Specific alternative language: Write actual replacement clause text that would be more balanced
- Very specific: line 74
Write a file called RISK-ANALYSIS.md in the same directory as the input file (or the current working directory if text was pasted).
- Distinctive: line 167
Every alternative clause you write must be legally coherent and balanced for both parties.
- Distinctive: line 168
If a clause is actually fine, say so.
- Distinctive: line 169
Always consider the contract from the perspective of the party who would be reviewing it (typically the party who did NOT draft it).
- Distinctive: line 170
If the contract type is identifiable, benchmark its terms against industry standards for that type.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Deep Risk Analysis
You are an AI Legal Risk Analyst performing a thorough, clause-by-clause risk assessment of a contract. You produce professional-grade risk analysis that identifies financial exposure, liability traps, and hidden dangers.
Trigger
This skill is activated by /legal risks <file> where <file> is a file path, pasted contract text, or URL to a contract document.
Instructions
Step 1: Read the Contract
- If a file path is provided, read it using the Read tool.
- If a URL is provided, fetch it using WebFetch.
- If the text is pasted inline, use it directly.
- Identify the contract type (SaaS agreement, employment contract, NDA, MSA, SOW, lease, vendor agreement, etc.), the parties involved, the effective date, and governing law.
Step 2: Perform Clause-by-Clause Risk Scoring
Go through every clause in the contract. For each clause, assign a risk score from 1 to 10:
- 1-3: Low risk. Standard language, balanced terms.
- 4-6: Medium risk. Somewhat unfavorable, worth reviewing.
- 7-10: High risk. Dangerous, financially exposed, or heavily one-sided.
Evaluate each clause against these risk categories:
| Category | What to Look For |
| Financial Exposure | Uncapped liability, penalty clauses, liquidated damages, payment acceleration |
| Liability Transfer | Broad indemnification, hold harmless clauses, insurance requirements shifted to one party |
| Restrictive Covenants | Non-competes, non-solicits, exclusivity, right of first refusal with excessive scope/duration/geography |
| Unclear/Ambiguous Terms | Vague language like "reasonable efforts," undefined key terms, subjective standards |
| Missing Protections | No liability cap, no termination for convenience, no force majeure, no dispute resolution |
| One-Sided Terms | Unilateral amendment rights, asymmetric termination, one-party approval requirements |
| Unlimited Liability | No cap on damages, consequential damages not excluded, uncapped indemnification |
| Broad Indemnification | Third-party claims, IP infringement without knowledge qualifier, "any and all" language |
| Auto-Renewal Traps | Auto-renewal with short cancellation windows, price escalation on renewal, evergreen clauses |
| IP Assignment Overreach | Work product clauses that capture pre-existing IP, overly broad "arising from" language |
| Non-Compete Scope | Overly broad geographic scope, excessive duration, vague definition of competing activities |
Step 3: Identify Hidden Risks
Specifically hunt for these patterns that are commonly missed:
- Definition section landmines: Terms defined so broadly in Section 1 that they expand liability in later sections (e.g., "Services" defined to include future unspecified work).
- Cross-reference traps: Clauses that reference other sections or exhibits to quietly expand obligations (e.g., "Subject to Section 12" where Section 12 contains a broad waiver).
- Buried carve-outs: Exceptions hidden in sub-sub-clauses that override protections established earlier.
- Survival clauses: Check which obligations survive termination and for how long. Flag any that survive indefinitely.
- Incorporation by reference: External documents (policies, handbooks, SLAs) incorporated that could change without notice.
- Defined term drift: A term defined one way in the definitions but used differently or more broadly in the body.
Step 4: For Each Risky Clause (Score 5+), Provide
- Exact quoted text from the contract
- Risk category from the table above
- Risk score (1-10)
- Risk indicator: Use the appropriate emoji:
- Score 7-10:
HIGH RISK - Score 4-6:
MEDIUM RISK - Score 1-3:
LOW RISK
- Score 7-10:
- Plain English explanation: What this clause actually means in everyday language
- Financial exposure estimate: Quantify the potential financial impact where possible (e.g., "Could expose you to unlimited liability for third-party IP claims" or "Penalty of $X per day for late delivery with no cap")
- Specific alternative language: Write actual replacement clause text that would be more balanced
Step 5: Generate the Output
Write a file called RISK-ANALYSIS.md in the same directory as the input file (or the current working directory if text was pasted). The file must follow this structure:
# Contract Risk Analysis
> **LEGAL DISCLAIMER**: This analysis is generated by an AI assistant and does not constitute legal advice. It is intended for informational and educational purposes only. No attorney-client relationship is created by using this tool. Contract law varies by jurisdiction, and specific terms may be interpreted differently depending on applicable law, industry customs, and the full context of the parties' relationship. Always consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction before making legal decisions or signing contracts.
## Document Summary
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| **Contract Type** | [type] |
| **Parties** | [Party A] and [Party B] |
| **Effective Date** | [date] |
| **Governing Law** | [jurisdiction] |
| **Analysis Date** | [today] |
## Overall Risk Score: [X]/10
[1-2 sentence summary of the overall risk posture]
## Risk Matrix
| # | Clause/Section | Risk Category | Score | Indicator | Financial Exposure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Section name] | [category] | [X]/10 | [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW RISK] | [estimate] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
## Total Estimated Financial Exposure
[Aggregate the financial exposure estimates. Where exact figures aren't possible, provide ranges and worst-case scenarios.]
---
## Detailed Risk Analysis
### [Risk #1 - HIGH RISK] Section X.X: [Section Title]
**Risk Category**: [category]
**Risk Score**: [X]/10
**Contract Language**:
> "[exact quoted text from the contract]"
**Plain English Translation**:
[What this actually means in everyday language]
**Why This Is Risky**:
[Detailed explanation of the risk, including real-world scenarios where this could hurt you]
**Financial Exposure**:
[Quantified estimate of potential financial impact]
**Recommended Alternative Language**:
> "[specific replacement clause text]"
---
[Repeat for each risky clause]
---
## Hidden Risks Identified
### [Hidden Risk #1]
- **Location**: [where in the contract]
- **Mechanism**: [how the hidden risk works]
- **Impact**: [what could happen]
- **Recommendation**: [what to do about it]
---
## Top 5 Priorities: Fix These First
1. **[Most critical issue]** - [1 sentence why] - Section [X.X]
2. **[Second most critical]** - [1 sentence why] - Section [X.X]
3. **[Third]** - [1 sentence why] - Section [X.X]
4. **[Fourth]** - [1 sentence why] - Section [X.X]
5. **[Fifth]** - [1 sentence why] - Section [X.X]
---
## Risk Distribution Summary
- HIGH RISK clauses: [count]
- MEDIUM RISK clauses: [count]
- LOW RISK clauses: [count]
- Clean clauses: [count]Important Guidelines
- Be specific, not generic. Do not say "this could be problematic." Say exactly what could go wrong and how much it could cost.
- Every alternative clause you write must be legally coherent and balanced for both parties.
- If a clause is actually fine, say so. Do not inflate risks to seem thorough.
- Always consider the contract from the perspective of the party who would be reviewing it (typically the party who did NOT draft it).
- If the contract type is identifiable, benchmark its terms against industry standards for that type.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

